CARE-CP (Testing a Cardiovascular Ambulatory Rapid Evaluation for Patients With Chest Pain)

NCT ID: NCT05897632

Last Updated: 2025-10-31

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

502 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-10-02

Study Completion Date

2026-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The goal of this study is to determine if rapid outpatient evaluation vs hospitalization management is the best strategy (based on patient-centered measures and safe, equitable, and efficient resource use) for evaluating patients with acute chest pain who are at moderate risk for acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Patients will be randomized in the Emergency Department to either an outpatient evaluation (CARE-CP) or hospitalization evaluation for their symptoms.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Current care patterns for the 7 million patients visiting Emergency Departments (EDs) in the United States with chest pain are heterogeneous and not sustainable from a healthcare quality or economic perspective. Chest pain is the second most common cause of ED visits and the most common reason for short-stay hospitalizations. During these hospitalizations patients undergo in-depth evaluations (stress testing, computed tomography coronary angiography, or invasive angiography), but ultimately \<10% are diagnosed with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). These evaluations cost $3 billion annually and strain health system resources without clear evidence of improved health outcomes or patient experience. The preliminary data suggest that moderate risk patients (35% of patients with chest pain) can be safely managed as outpatients using a cardiovascular ambulatory rapid evaluation (CARE-CP) strategy as an alternative to hospitalization. In the CARE-CP strategy, patients are discharged from the ED and receive outpatient clinic follow-up within 72 hours focused on medical management for cardiovascular risk factors (e.g., hypertension, diabetes) and determining whether further cardiac testing is needed. This strategy aims to enhance patient-centered outcomes while safely and equitably decreasing hospital resource utilization. However, equipoise exists between outpatient and hospitalization strategies for moderate risk patients. There is a paucity of prospective data evaluating the efficacy and patient-centeredness of outpatient chest pain evaluation strategies in moderate risk patients. Thus, it is unclear whether use of an outpatient chest pain management strategy (CARE-CP) will safely reduce healthcare utilization and be preferred by patients compared to a traditional hospitalization strategy. To address this key evidence gap, the study proposes the first prospective multisite randomized trial testing outpatient vs hospitalization strategies in moderate risk patients. The research teams will randomize 502 patients 1:1 to the CARE-CP or hospitalization management arms at three ED sites with a history of high recruitment rates and productive collaborations in cardiovascular clinical trials. The primary outcome will be hospital-free days (HFD) over a 30-day period. This novel trial addresses a key evidence gap by providing guidance on how best to evaluate moderate risk ED patients with acute chest pain. Without this guidance care patterns are likely to remain heterogeneous, inefficient, non-patient-centered, and unguided by the highest level of evidence. We hypothesize that data from this trial will support widespread implementation of a CARE-CP strategy, which could improve the quality and value of care for millions of patients in the U.S. and beyond.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Chest Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Patients will be randomized with equal probability (1:1) to the outpatient arm or the hospitalization arms using permuted block randomization.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Outpatient Evaluation

Patients randomized to this arm are discharged and receive outpatient evaluation, or cardiovascular ambulatory rapid evaluation (CARE), focused on medical management for cardiovascular risk factors (e.g. hypertension) within 72 hours of Emergency Department discharge.

Group Type OTHER

Outpatient Evaluation

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Subjects will receive an outpatient evaluation within 72 of being discharged from the ED.

Hospitalization Evaluation

Patients randomized to this arm receive evaluation for their symptoms in a hospital ward, observation unit, or emergency department boarding.

Group Type OTHER

Hospitalization Evaluation

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Patients randomized to this arm receive evaluation for their symptoms in a hospital ward, observation unit, or emergency department boarding.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Outpatient Evaluation

Subjects will receive an outpatient evaluation within 72 of being discharged from the ED.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Hospitalization Evaluation

Patients randomized to this arm receive evaluation for their symptoms in a hospital ward, observation unit, or emergency department boarding.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

CARE-CP (Cardiovascular Ambulatory Rapid Evaluation)

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age ≥21 years old
* Chest pain or Symptoms of acute coronary syndrome (ACS)
* Moderate risk of ACS (all of the below)
* Hear Score 4-6
* Non-Ischemic electrocardiogram (ECG)
* Two Troponin measures \< Sex-Specific Upper Reference Limit

* Women \<15 pg/ml
* Men \<20 pg/ml
* No prior coronary artery disease (CAD)

* No Prior Myocardial Infarction (MI)
* No Prior Coronary Revascularization Procedures
* No Patients with ≥ 70% Obstructive Coronary Disease

Exclusion Criteria

* ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) Activation
* ST Changes or new T-wave inversions ≥1mm on ECG
* Any Elevated Troponin Measure (Based on Sex-Specific 99th Percentile)
* Serial change between Troponin Measures (Delta) ≥5 pg/mL
* Stress Echocardiography, Nuclear Stress Test, Stress ECG, Stress Cardiac MRI, Coronary CT Angiogram (CCTA), Invasive Coronary Angiography (Cardiac Cath) within 1 year
* "Clean" CCTA or Cardiac Cath (0% stenosis in all vessels) within the past 2 years
* Chest Trauma
* Pregnancy
* Life Expectancy \< 1 year
* Other comorbid conditions requiring hospitalization
* Unstable Vitals (Blood Pressure \<90, Heart Rate \>120 or \<50, O2 Sat \<90%)
* End Stage Renal Disease; Dialysis or estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) \<30 mL/min
* Transfers From Another Hospital
* Non-English Speaking
* Prisoners
* Prior Enrollment
* Already Enrolled in Other Interventional Trial
Minimum Eligible Age

21 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)

FED

Sponsor Role collaborator

Wake Forest University Health Sciences

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Simon Mahler, MD, MS

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Wake Forest University Health Sciences

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Henry Ford Hospital

Detroit, Michigan, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Carolinas Medical Center

Charlotte, North Carolina, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Wake Forest University Health Sciences

Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Lauren Koehler

Role: CONTACT

336-716-4646

Lauren Victory

Role: CONTACT

336-716-7260

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Lauren Koehler

Role: primary

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IRB00092604

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Enhancing Heart Failure Self-Care
NCT00526773 COMPLETED NA
Risk Score Alerts for Chest Pain Care
NCT00674375 COMPLETED PHASE3
Congestive Heart Failure Outreach Program
NCT00371085 COMPLETED PHASE4
Surveillance HeartCare® Outcomes Registry
NCT03695601 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Heart Failure Medication Adherence
NCT03402750 COMPLETED NA