Effect of an Optimal Heart Team Protocol on Decision-making Stability

NCT ID: NCT05039567

Last Updated: 2023-03-30

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

84 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-01-04

Study Completion Date

2023-02-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study is aimed to evaluate the effect of the optimal heart team implementation protocol on the stability of decision-making for patients with complex coronary artery disease.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Current guidelines recommend a heart team in the decision making for patients with complex coronary artery disease (CAD). Previous study reported that the agreement between heart teams for revascularization decision-making in complex CAD patients was moderate. Potential factors associated with decision discrepancies were summarized in several aspects and a detailed heart team implementation protocol was generated and further validation is needed. This study is designed to evaluate the effect of the optimal heart team implementation protocol on the stability of decision-making for patients with complex coronary artery disease.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Coronary Artery Disease

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

optimal heart team group

Heart teams in this group will be established according to the optimal heart team protocol. Each team consists of two interventional cardiologists and two cardiac surgeons. Team members will be trained systematically before the heart team meeting.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

optimal heart team protocol

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Heart teams in the experimental group will be established and trained based on the optimal heart team implementation protocol. The protocol included instructions on specialist selection, specialist training, team composition, team training and formal implementation precess.

conventional heart team group

Heart teams in this group will be established according to the basic elements recommended by guidelines. Each team consists of an interventional cardiologist, a cardiac surgeon, and a non-interventional cardiologist. No team training will be held before the heart team meeting.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

optimal heart team protocol

Heart teams in the experimental group will be established and trained based on the optimal heart team implementation protocol. The protocol included instructions on specialist selection, specialist training, team composition, team training and formal implementation precess.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Patients with stable CAD according to the National Cardiovascular Data Registry (NCDR) CathPCI criteria (stable angina, no or silent myocardial ischemia) and angiographically confirmed 3-vessel disease or left main disease.


1. Annual PCI volume ≥200
2. Annual left main PCI volume ≥25
3. Capable of chronic total occlusion(CTO) PCI
4. Clinical researcher experience in coronary revascularization
5. Proficient in clinical guidelines


1. CABG total volume ≥200
2. Proficient in both on-pump and off-pump CABG
3. Clinical researcher experience in coronary revascularization
4. Proficient in clinical guidelines


1\) Proficient in clinical guidelines

Exclusion Criteria

1. prior percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG);
2. cardiac troponin I (CTnI) greater than the local laboratory upper limit of normal or recent myocardial infarction with CTnI levels still elevated;
3. concomitant severe valvular disease, macrovascular disease, or huge ventricular aneurysm requiring surgery;
4. concomitant atrial fibrillation or severe arrhythmia

Eligibility Criteria for specialists:
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

90 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

China National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Zhe Zheng, MD,PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Fuwai Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

National Clinical Research Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College

Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Ma H, Lin S, Li X, Wang Y, Xu B, Zheng Z. Effect of a standardised heart team protocol versus a guideline-based protocol on revascularisation decision stability in stable complex coronary artery disease: rationale and design of a randomised trial of cardiology specialists using historic cases. BMJ Open. 2022 Dec 1;12(12):e064761. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064761.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 36456006 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2019-1303-2

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

HEART Pathway Implementation
NCT02056964 COMPLETED