Interventions to Support Long-Term Adherence aNd Decrease Cardiovascular Events Post-Myocardial Infarction
NCT ID: NCT02382731
Last Updated: 2018-03-23
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
2742 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-09-30
2017-10-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Prevention of Early Readmission in Elderly Congestive Heart Failure Patients
NCT00000475
Peer Support for Women With Heart Disease: Women@Heart
NCT03286010
Motivational Interviewing and Medication Review in Coronary Heart Disease
NCT02102503
Individual Nurse-led Counselling Programme for Patients Early Discharged After Myocardial Infarction.
NCT02640274
Educational and Supportive Interventions to Prevent Cardiopulmonary Rehospitalization
NCT00217867
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Background: In patients who have had a myocardial infarction (MI) and coronary disease, guidelines recommend cardiac rehabilitation services and the long-term use of cardiac medications to reduce the risk of recurrent cardiovascular events. Adherence to these recommendations substantially reduces morbidity and mortality post-MI. However, for a variety of patient, provider, and system-level reasons, adherence to cardiac medications declines to approximately 50% by 12 months. Likewise, only 30-40% of patients participate in cardiac rehabilitation. Thus, interventions to increase secondary prevention treatment adherence are urgently needed.
The Cardiac Care Network of Ontario (CCN) holds a registry of all patients in the province who have a coronary angiography. The registry has been used to identify gaps in care and to plan health system strategies for high-risk patients. More recently, a pilot trial was conducted in Hamilton by the trial team using data in the registry to send recurrent postal reminders regarding the importance of treatment adherence to patients, their pharmacists, and family physicians. A similar program is underway in Ottawa using automated phone calls with interactive voice response and nurse follow up. These interventions both have the potential to address known determinants of adherence. The CCN, Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care, Health Quality Ontario, and other stakeholders across Ontario are interested in evaluating the comparative effectiveness and costs of these interventions.
Research Questions: The research objectives were formed by the decision makers' need to evaluate whether and in what format to sustain and/or scale-up post-MI educational reminder interventions:
i. Can educational reminders delivered via post and/or using interactive voice response with personalized telephone follow up improve secondary prevention treatment adherence post-MI?
ii. How do different approaches to improve adherence to these recommendations compare in terms of clinical effectiveness and costs?
iii. Which subgroups are more/less likely to respond to reminders?
Research Approach: This is a pragmatic, randomized controlled trial with blinded outcome assessment. Patients in cardiac centres throughout Ontario who undergo a coronary angiography will be provided a letter of information explaining the study appended to the standard CCN letter of information. CCN will identify eligible patients (those with substantial coronary artery disease who survive their initial hospitalization post-MI) and provide the patient list back to the cardiac centre. A representative at the centre will securely send this list to the Population Health Research Institute in Hamilton. Patients will be randomized by the Population Health Research Institute team to one of three arms:
1. \- Usual care, with no standardized educational materials or reminders
2. \- Postal letters sent from Population Health Research Institute on behalf of each hospital's interventional cardiology team to the patient approximately 4, 8, 20, 32, and 44 weeks post-MI, with an insert for the family physician and pharmacist at approximately 4 and 8 weeks post-MI.
3. \- Postal letters as above plus interactive voice response phone calls to the patient delivered approximately 2 weeks after the letters, as well as personalized telephone follow up by trained lay health workers for patients identified by the interactive voice response system as non-adherent.
Patient self-report and administrative data will be used to assess outcomes 12 months post-MI. Analyses will be by intention to treat. The primary outcome is adherence to guideline-recommended treatments. Secondary outcomes include health services utilization (including outpatient visits to interventional cardiology), recurrent cardiovascular events, and mortality. During the trial, a theory-informed process questionnaire will be administered to a random sub-sample. An economic evaluation will be conducted from the perspective of the public health care payer.
Implications: This project has the potential to lead to improvements in care for patients at high cardiovascular risk as well as provide generalizable insights regarding how to optimize interventions to improve adherence. Further, it has the potential to inform how other health databases could be used to improve health system performance.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Usual care
Usual care (no intervention)
No interventions assigned to this group
Usual care + letters
Usual care plus a series of postal educational reminders (including information for patients to share with clinicians)
Usual care + letters
A series of five postal educational reminders sent on behalf of each hospital's interventional cardiology team to the patient approximately 4, 8, 20, 32, and 44 weeks post-MI procedure, with an insert for the family physician and pharmacist at approximately 4 and 8 weeks post-MI procedure.
Usual care + letters + automated calls
Usual care plus a series of postal educational reminders (including information for patients to share with clinicians), plus automated reminder interactive voice response phone calls to identify patients at being at risk for non-adherence and a trained lay health worker to provide additional support and navigation for such patients via telephone.
Usual care + letters + automated calls
A series of five postal educational reminders as per the usual care + letters arm plus interactive voice response phone calls to the patient delivered approximately 2 weeks after the letters, as well as personalized telephone follow up by trained lay health workers for patients identified by the interactive voice response system as non-adherent. The automated algorithm is designed to identify patients who are non-adherent and who may benefit from personalized educational phone call and/or system navigation support by the lay health worker. Lay health workers will not provide clinical advice.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Usual care + letters
A series of five postal educational reminders sent on behalf of each hospital's interventional cardiology team to the patient approximately 4, 8, 20, 32, and 44 weeks post-MI procedure, with an insert for the family physician and pharmacist at approximately 4 and 8 weeks post-MI procedure.
Usual care + letters + automated calls
A series of five postal educational reminders as per the usual care + letters arm plus interactive voice response phone calls to the patient delivered approximately 2 weeks after the letters, as well as personalized telephone follow up by trained lay health workers for patients identified by the interactive voice response system as non-adherent. The automated algorithm is designed to identify patients who are non-adherent and who may benefit from personalized educational phone call and/or system navigation support by the lay health worker. Lay health workers will not provide clinical advice.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Discharged from the catheterization centre alive, either home or to a local (non-cardiac) hospital
* Patients must be Ontario residents
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients will also be excluded if they require a translator to receive services in English as recorded in the CCN referral form, as it is infeasible to offer the interventions in multiple languages at this stage.
* Patients whose data are not complete and received in time to deliver the first post-procedure intervention will be excluded as they cannot receive the intervention as intended.
* Patients who do not have an Ontario health card number
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Population Health Research Institute
OTHER
Women's College Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Noah Ivers
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Women's College Hospital
John-David Schwalm
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Population Health Research Institute
Madhu Natarajan
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Population Health Research Institute
Jeremy Grimshaw
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
El-Menyar A, Zubaid M, AlMahmeed W, Sulaiman K, AlNabti A, Singh R, Al Suwaidi J. Killip classification in patients with acute coronary syndrome: insight from a multicenter registry. Am J Emerg Med. 2012 Jan;30(1):97-103. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2010.10.011. Epub 2010 Dec 14.
McCleary N, Ivers NM, Schwalm JD, Witteman HO, Taljaard M, Desveaux L, Bouck Z, Grace SL, Grimshaw JM, Presseau J. Impacts of two behavior change interventions on determinants of medication adherence: process evaluation applying the health action process approach and habit theory alongside a randomized controlled trial. J Behav Med. 2022 Oct;45(5):659-673. doi: 10.1007/s10865-022-00327-0. Epub 2022 May 20.
Desveaux L, Saragosa M, Russell K, McCleary N, Presseau J, Witteman HO, Schwalm JD, Ivers NM. How and why a multifaceted intervention to improve adherence post-MI worked for some (and could work better for others): an outcome-driven qualitative process evaluation. BMJ Open. 2020 Sep 3;10(9):e036750. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036750.
Ivers NM, Schwalm JD, Bouck Z, McCready T, Taljaard M, Grace SL, Cunningham J, Bosiak B, Presseau J, Witteman HO, Suskin N, Wijeysundera HC, Atzema C, Bhatia RS, Natarajan M, Grimshaw JM. Interventions supporting long term adherence and decreasing cardiovascular events after myocardial infarction (ISLAND): pragmatic randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2020 Jun 10;369:m1731. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m1731.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
#06683
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.