Spine Angle Comparison in Adult Seating Posture With Immediate Feedback

NCT ID: NCT05893953

Last Updated: 2023-06-08

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

28 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-11-20

Study Completion Date

2017-12-05

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

1. Background: In modern society, people are spending more time sitting due to the increased use of IT devices. Prolonged sitting with incorrect posture can lead to spinal deformities and an increase in spinal diseases. Common deformities include turtle neck posture, flat back, straight neck, and bent back. Misalignment of the spine is considered an important factor in causing spinal diseases, such as pain, arthritis, and degeneration. To address these issues, researchers have developed pillows and chairs that are ergonomically designed for everyday use and have been found to be effective.
2. Purpose: This study aims to investigate whether portable equipment can help individuals recognize and maintain correct sitting posture on their own.
3. Design: This study has a cross-sectional study design. Each condition is divided into three different sitting conditions. By using post-evaluation data, the intention is to compare the effects. (Condition A: sitting on a standard chair wearing an immediately feedback device, Condition B: sitting on a gym-ball, Condition C: sitting on standard chair)
4. Subject : Twenty-eight subjects were recruited as healthy students attending S University located in Nowon-gu, Seoul.
5. Result: The study found that maintaining a sitting posture immediately resulted in a statistically significant lower angle over time at the Cervicothoracic angle compared to other interventions. Similarly, a sitting posture immediately maintained a lower angle over time at the Thoracic angle compared to other sitting postures . However, the lumbar angle showed a significant increase over time.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Spinal Curvatures Feedback, Psychological Sitting Position

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

SCREENING

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Normal Healthy Students(Condition A)

sitting in a standard chair wearing an immediately feedback device

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

immediately feedback device

Intervention Type DEVICE

Sitting in a standard chair with immediate feedback device

Normal Healthy Students(Condition B)

sitting in a gym-ball

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Unstable chair

Intervention Type DEVICE

sitting in an unstable chair

Normal Healthy Students(Condition C)

sitting in a standard chair(control group)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Standard chair

Intervention Type OTHER

Sitting in a standard chair

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

immediately feedback device

Sitting in a standard chair with immediate feedback device

Intervention Type DEVICE

Unstable chair

sitting in an unstable chair

Intervention Type DEVICE

Standard chair

Sitting in a standard chair

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

gym-ball Control

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Healthy 20-year-olds with no visual and hearing problems and no problems with video viewing and agreeing to participate in the experiment

Exclusion Criteria

* Those who needed treatment due to pain in the neck, chest, or back were excluded.

Those who had been diagnosed with a diagnosis that stopped studying and stopped sports activities in the past 12 months were excluded.
Minimum Eligible Age

20 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

29 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Sahmyook University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

JINHYUNG CHOI

Student

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Choi Jinhyung

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Sahmyook University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Sahmyook University

Seoul, Nowon-gu, South Korea

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

South Korea

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

sahmyook U

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.