Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
30 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2023-01-22
2023-03-14
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
There is consensus among researchers that supporting the natural lordotic curve of the cervical spine is necessary to achieve longer periods of deep sleep. In addition, a pillow can improve sleep quality by cooling the head, lowering body temperature, reducing sweating or slowing the heart rate during sleep. However, the level of evidence to support these claims is so far limited. It has been claimed by pillow manufacturers that many design-related pillow parameters are effective in improving sleep quality and reducing neck pain. However, most of these recommendations are based on personal experience.
This study recommends the most suitable pillow for people in forward head postures based on the body pressure distribution of the head, neck and upper body. The proposed pillows were evaluated in two parameters: comfort and support.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Factors Affecting Neck Posture in Academicians With Non-specific Neck Pain
NCT04712682
Spine Angle Comparison in Adult Seating Posture With Immediate Feedback
NCT05893953
The Effect of Stabilization Exercises on Pain, Posture, and Sleep in Office Workers With Neck Pain
NCT06731816
Postural Based Telerehabilitation in Mechanic Neck Pain
NCT05293847
Effects of Corrective Exercises and Postural Education on Forward Head Posture
NCT05894941
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
While studies on the support and comfort of human contact surfaces generally focus on sitting posture, there is limited information available because the assessment of sleep position is more complex. The main reason behind this confusion is that the human body can take many different positions while sleeping. In supine, prone or side lying positions, the pressure or support properties of the human contact surfaces of the pillow against individuals vary greatly. In addition, head-neck curvatures that vary from person to person can also change their support and comfort needs.
In current research on pillows, assessments can be made subjectively or objectively. Subjective evaluations are made by completing an evaluation form based on the person's self-report after the sleep test. In this evaluation form, the amount of comfort and support that the person gets from the pillow is questioned. Although this method directly reveals one's own thoughts, it has poor reproducibility, the results can be easily manipulated, it takes a long time to be done, and it is not suitable for complex experiments. Objective assessments can be made by analyzing body pressure distributions, EMG signals and anthropometric characteristics of individuals. According to the results of the studies, it has been shown that the evaluation method performed with body pressure distributions is the most effective method. This may be because body pressure distribution can respond quickly to materials used, support arrangements, human weight or lying positions.
Studies have shown that long-term high pressure applied to certain parts of the human body can affect the human central nervous, blood circulatory and endocrine system. In addition, different parts of the human body show great sensitivity to pressure due to differences in subcutaneous tissue and tissue structures. In terms of ergonomics, the pressure perception of the human body can be divided into dull parts and sensitive parts. Dull parts can withstand more pressure, while sensitive parts can only feel comfortable when the pressure is low. Therefore, one of the main goals in pillow selection should be to reduce the pressure applied to sensitive points.
Although it has been reported that the main role of the pillow is to optimize head and neck posture, there are limited studies on its effectiveness in terms of its effect on head and neck posture. About a third of human life is spent in sleep, during which the spine is beyond our conscious control. Therefore, pillows play an important role in maintaining ideal head and neck posture and can change muscle activities.
Head and neck position is an important factor affecting sleep quality. It is reported that while sleeping, cervical control weakens and places excessive stress on spinal structures. Symptoms such as neck and shoulder pain, tension headaches and muscle stiffness that occur during this time reduce sleep quality. That's way, there is a serious requirement to investigate how different pillow designs can effectively support the cervical spine to reduce neck pain and thus improve sleep quality.
Forward head posture (FHP) is the anterior alignment of the cervical spine; it is also known as "text neck," "scholar's neck," "wearies neck," "ihunch," and "reading neck." Several factors, including sleeping with the head lifted excessively high, prolonged use of computers, laptops, and cell phones, lack of developed back muscle strength, and nutritional deficiencies such as calcium, contribute to this postural disorder. Age is linked with decreased cervical ROM, thoracic kyphosis is associated with increased cervical flexion, and increased forward head posture is associated with larger deficits in cervical rotation and flexion ROM.
Scientific evidence suggests that head postural changes affect the development and persistence of neck pain. Therefore, it should be one of the main factors for choosing an ergonomically correct pillow. In addition, the cervical muscles play an important role in the control of neck posture. The reduced ability of these muscles to maintain the upright posture of the cervical spine may indicate that their endurance is impaired and they are unable to maintain cervical lordosis. Since various studies often report a significant association between weak neck muscles, poor posture, and experience of neck pain, and considering that a pillow can reduce pain and disability, it should be considered that the pillow needs of individuals with a forward head posture may differ.
Pillow comfort research is relatively new and the factors affecting the selection of the right pillow are still unclear. For example, it is not correct to accept the head and neck regions as a whole and accept comfort and support demands as similar. Because the position of the head with respect to the height differs in the normal head posture or tilting the head forward, and this may affect the comfort or support properties of the pillow. Due to differences in head posture, the comfort and support demands of the head and neck areas in contact with the pillow will also vary.
There is consensus among researchers that supporting the natural lordotic curve of the cervical spine is necessary to achieve longer periods of deep sleep. In addition, a pillow can improve sleep quality by cooling the head, lowering body temperature, reducing sweating or slowing the heart rate during sleep. However, the level of evidence to support these claims is so far limited. It has been claimed by pillow manufacturers that many design-related pillow parameters are effective in improving sleep quality and reducing neck pain. However, most of these recommendations are based on personal experience.
This study recommends the most suitable pillow for people in forward head postures based on the body pressure distribution of the head, neck and upper body. The proposed pillows were evaluated in two parameters: comfort and support.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Slight Forward Head Posture
This descriptive cross-sectional study which was approved by Çankırı Karatekin University Ethics Committee (Approval number:). There is FHP if the imaginary line between the tragus of the ear and the middle of the shoulder is not on the same line when viewed from the side. And the horizontal length between that two vertical lines indicates the severity of FHP. The level of FHP is classified as slight/severe/highly FHP according to that horizontal length. The slight FHP is accepted as between 0-2.5cm, and severe FHP above 2.5cm (27).
XSensor
A pressure mapping system (X3 SENSOR PX 100:64.160.02, X-Sensor®, Calgary, Canada) was used to record the pressure distribution in mmHg of the head and shoulder section \[18,19\]. Pressure distribution was recorded for 1 minute for each lying position. The purpose of these measurements was to describe the pressure distribution created by the participants in the pillow and the supported areas, as well as to find out the differences that may occur between the pillows. Lower pressure values measured by the device were defined as "high comfort", while more contact of the head area with the pillow was accepted as "high support".
Severe Forward Head Posture
This descriptive cross-sectional study which was approved by Çankırı Karatekin University Ethics Committee (Approval number:). There is FHP if the imaginary line between the tragus of the ear and the middle of the shoulder is not on the same line when viewed from the side. And the horizontal length between that two vertical lines indicates the severity of FHP. The level of FHP is classified as slight/severe/highly FHP according to that horizontal length. The slight FHP is accepted as between 0-2.5cm, and severe FHP above 2.5cm (27).
XSensor
A pressure mapping system (X3 SENSOR PX 100:64.160.02, X-Sensor®, Calgary, Canada) was used to record the pressure distribution in mmHg of the head and shoulder section \[18,19\]. Pressure distribution was recorded for 1 minute for each lying position. The purpose of these measurements was to describe the pressure distribution created by the participants in the pillow and the supported areas, as well as to find out the differences that may occur between the pillows. Lower pressure values measured by the device were defined as "high comfort", while more contact of the head area with the pillow was accepted as "high support".
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
XSensor
A pressure mapping system (X3 SENSOR PX 100:64.160.02, X-Sensor®, Calgary, Canada) was used to record the pressure distribution in mmHg of the head and shoulder section \[18,19\]. Pressure distribution was recorded for 1 minute for each lying position. The purpose of these measurements was to describe the pressure distribution created by the participants in the pillow and the supported areas, as well as to find out the differences that may occur between the pillows. Lower pressure values measured by the device were defined as "high comfort", while more contact of the head area with the pillow was accepted as "high support".
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Good cognitive status (Mini Mental Test \>23/30
Exclusion Criteria
* Spinal disraphism
* Spinal rheumotological disorders
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Çankırı Karatekin University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Ceyhun Türkmen
Asst. Prof.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
ODTU Teknopark ASO
Ankara, , Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Andreoni G, Santambrogio GC, Rabuffetti M, Pedotti A. Method for the analysis of posture and interface pressure of car drivers. Appl Ergon. 2002 Nov;33(6):511-22. doi: 10.1016/s0003-6870(02)00069-8.
Le P, Rose J, Knapik G, Marras WS. Objective classification of vehicle seat discomfort. Ergonomics. 2014;57(4):536-44. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2014.887787. Epub 2014 Mar 7.
de Looze MP, Kuijt-Evers LF, van Dieen J. Sitting comfort and discomfort and the relationships with objective measures. Ergonomics. 2003 Aug 15;46(10):985-97. doi: 10.1080/0014013031000121977.
Miyatsuji A, Matsumoto T, Mitarai S, Kotabe T, Takeshima T, Watanuki S. Effects of clothing pressure caused by different types of brassieres on autonomic nervous system activity evaluated by heart rate variability power spectral analysis. J Physiol Anthropol Appl Human Sci. 2002 Jan;21(1):67-74. doi: 10.2114/jpa.21.67.
Zhong S, Shen L, Zhou L, Guan Z. Predict human body indentation lying on a spring mattress using a neural network approach. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2014 Aug;228(8):787-99. doi: 10.1177/0954411914547552. Epub 2014 Aug 22.
Leilnahari K, Fatouraee N, Khodalotfi M, Sadeghein MA, Kashani YA. Spine alignment in men during lateral sleep position: experimental study and modeling. Biomed Eng Online. 2011 Nov 30;10:103. doi: 10.1186/1475-925X-10-103.
Diab AA, Moustafa IM. The efficacy of forward head correction on nerve root function and pain in cervical spondylotic radiculopathy: a randomized trial. Clin Rehabil. 2012 Apr;26(4):351-61. doi: 10.1177/0269215511419536. Epub 2011 Sep 21.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
19/01/2023-30
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.