A Transdiagnostic Intervention for Health-related Habits (LEV)
NCT ID: NCT05889936
Last Updated: 2024-05-07
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
36 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-01-25
2023-12-21
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Study 1: Is LEV a feasible intervention in different healthcare contexts? Study 2: A functional roadmap to healthier habits: A thematic analysis of themes form the functional analysis of unhealthy and healthy lifestyle behavior in adults with disabilities This study will use data from study 1.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Evaluation of a Personalised Digital Intervention (EviBody) for Healthy and Sustained Lifestyle Behaviors and Well-being Among Adults: a Real-world Quasi-experimental Study
NCT05973383
App-technology to Improve Healthy Lifestyle Behaviors Among Working Adults
NCT03579342
Prevention of Lifestyle-related Disorders Based on Functional Examinations
NCT06309342
Healthy Lifestyles for People With Intellectual Disabilities
NCT00597948
Mobile Mental Health Stigma Reduction Intervention Among Black Adults
NCT06316804
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Study 1: The feasibility trial investigates the following questions:
1. Eligibility to participate - how many of the healthcare workers that had received training in Lev started using it within 6 months? How many participants that were offered Lev agreed to take part in the intervention?
2. What were the reasons for not taking part or not completing Lev? Healthcare workers administering Lev will ask the declining participants for reasons to not take part in the intervention.
3. How many sessions and homework assignments did the participants complete? Lev includes screening (Lev-s), three sessions and two pre-specified home assignments. The administrating healthcare worker fills in completed sessions and assignments in the case report form. We will set the time limit to 6 months to complete the three sessions including all homework assignments.
4. Were there any differences between healthcare professions regarding how the applied behavioral analysis was performed (e.g., were there any differences regarding strategies suggested to the participant)?
During session 2, a functional behavioral analysis is performed to generate strategies to help the participant reach their goal. The investigators will conduct a thematic analysis to identify themes for each healthcare profession administrating Lev. This will answer questions regarding if it is possible to conduct this type of analysis in Lev or if further adjustments are needed.
5. Level of acceptability: Was Lev perceived as creditable and satisfactory by healthcare workers and participants? Treatment credibility will be measured before Lev and after the last session for both participants and healthcare workers. Treatment satisfaction will be evaluated after each session and after the intervention is completed. Session evaluations will be done by both participants and healthcare workers.
6. Was there any part of Lev that was perceived less satisfactory by participants and healthcare workers? A thematic analysis (Braun et al., 2004) will be performed to extract what was perceived as useful and to identify areas of improvement. This will be done both for participants and the healthcare workers.
7. Do the intervention lead to adverse events?
8. Do Lev lead to healthier habits?
9. To what extent were individual goals met?
10. Did Lev lead to increased quality of life?
Study 2:
1. What general themes underlying unhealthy and healthy habits can be found in individuals with disabilities?
2. How do themes vary for specific living habits?
3. How do themes vary for specific disabilities?
4. How do themes for questions b and c vary depending on sex?
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Treatment with the Lev-intervention
Screening of health-related habits using Lev-s + a three step/session intervention including the standard Lev protocol. Typically given over 10-20 weeks.
Lev
Lev includes three sessions using psychoeducation, motivational interviewing, and applied behavioral analyses. Lev also include two homework assignments. The second session can be repeated if needed. Lev-s and Lev are described in two manuals.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Lev
Lev includes three sessions using psychoeducation, motivational interviewing, and applied behavioral analyses. Lev also include two homework assignments. The second session can be repeated if needed. Lev-s and Lev are described in two manuals.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Insufficient command of the Swedish language/ unable to understand the content.
* Severe psychiatric comorbidity that makes participation difficult (e.g. severe depression, severe suicidality, severe anxiety, ongoing psychosis, manic episode), other circumstances that could make participation hard (e.g. homelessness).
18 Years
70 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Karolinska Institutet
OTHER
Region Stockholm
OTHER_GOV
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Douglas Sjowall
Principal investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Douglas Sjöwall, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Regions Stockholm
Joakim Lavesson, Bachelor
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Region Stockholm
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Region Stockholm, Habilitering & Hälsa
Stockholm, , Sweden
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
The LEV Project
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.