Multi-Level Stigma Intervention for Mental Health Services

NCT ID: NCT06200012

Last Updated: 2025-10-14

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

12 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-11-06

Study Completion Date

2025-02-08

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This cluster randomized trial develops and pilot tests a multi-level substance use stigma intervention that leverages organizational policy and professional education to address structural and professional drivers of stigma in outpatient mental health (MH) services. The investigators will generate preliminary data to determine whether adding an organizational policy to a professional stigma training may reduce measures of provider-based stigma towards substance use and improve care quality and patient outcomes to a greater degree than simply conducting training alone. The investigators hypothesize that providers at a MH site implementing an organizational policy change in addition to providing professional training will demonstrate greater improvement to health services for people who use drugs compared to a site where providers receive training alone.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Substance use is commonly stigmatized, even in health settings. Stigma toward people who use drugs (PWUD) arises from multiple sources, including policies and individuals who carry out policies ("structural stigma") and health professionals ("provider-based stigma"). This study seeks to answer the question of whether addressing organizational-level structural stigma toward PWUD enhances the behavioral effects of stigma training among professionals providing mental health (MH) services.

This study will have two intervention groups: A MH clinic where the providers receive only the educational intervention and a MH clinic where the providers receive both the educational intervention and an organizational policy change. The investigators hypothesize that providers at a MH site implementing an organizational policy change in addition to providing professional training will demonstrate greater improvement to health services for PWUD compared to a site where providers receive training alone.

Only a small body of research develops and evaluates interventions seeking to reduce structural and provider-based stigma toward PWUD in healthcare settings or investigates the impact of such interventions on provision of evidence-based interventions like substance use disorder (SUD) pharmacotherapy. Little is known about substance use stigma in MH settings in particular, although some research suggests psychiatrist stigma toward dual diagnosis patients is greater than toward patients with either a SUD or MH diagnosis alone. Extant studies on stigma toward PWUD in healthcare found educational interventions incorporating critical reflection techniques and contact with PWUD significantly reduced provider-based stigma. But most provider-based stigma intervention studies have two major weaknesses: 1) failing to address structural drivers of stigma, such as organizational policies motivating attitudes and behaviors, and 2) falling short of practical application because they largely focus on professional attitudes without measuring changes to service provision. The investigators propose to pilot test a multi-level stigma intervention that leverages what existing research suggests works in professional stigma education, and adds a novel component of organizational policy change within a MH clinic. Because so little research exists on organizational-level stigma interventions, the investigators will use an inductive approach to identify a promising feasible policy that may reduce stigma toward PWUD. Our pilot testing will assess the extent to which combining interventions that modify structural/organizational and individual/professional-level drivers of stigma in outpatient MH services may improve not only attitudes but also health service provision to PWUD.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Social Stigma Substance Use Disorders Mental Disorder

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Providers in the experimental and control arms are are not masked. Providers in the experimental arm have a policy at their clinic change, and they are aware of the policy change. The control arm does not implement the policy change, but may be aware of the policy change in the other arm. Both arms receive an educational intervention.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Control arm: educational training only

This arm received only an educational training for mental health professionals about substance use-related stigma

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Single-level stigma reduction intervention: educational training

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

A professional training targeting known attitudinal and knowledge drivers of substance use stigma

Experimental arm: educational training plus a policy change for controlled substance agreements

This arm received both 1) an educational training for mental health professionals about substance use-related stigma; and 2) a policy change that replaced the standard LifeStance Health system's "controlled substance agreement" (CSA) with a new agreement integrating principles of shared decision-making and offering prescribers a communication tool with suggestions for how to implement principles of shared decision-making and patient centered care in their use of the new CSA

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Multi-level stigma reduction intervention: educational training plus controlled substance agreement policy change

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Pairing a professional training targeting known attitudinal and knowledge drivers of substance use stigma with a policy altering potentially stigmatizing features of controlled substance agreements.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Multi-level stigma reduction intervention: educational training plus controlled substance agreement policy change

Pairing a professional training targeting known attitudinal and knowledge drivers of substance use stigma with a policy altering potentially stigmatizing features of controlled substance agreements.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Single-level stigma reduction intervention: educational training

A professional training targeting known attitudinal and knowledge drivers of substance use stigma

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Site inclusion:

* The sites will be selected using convenience sampling.
* The inclusion criterion will be sites with at least 4 providers.
2. Provider inclusion:

* Providers at participating sites will also be recruited using convenience sampling.
* Any psychiatrists or psychiatric NPs are eligible to participate as long as they are employed at the participating LSH site.
3. Patient EHR inclusion:

* All new patients entering mental health services during the 3-months prior and 3- months after the intervention will be included in the EHR data sample to assess whether substance use was addressed during their first visit and subsequent 3-month retention in care.
* Existing and new patients with alcohol use disorder (AUD)/opioid use disorder (OUD) will be identified through the EHR to assess pharmacotherapy initiation.
4. Patient survey inclusion:

* Half of the survey sample (n=20) will include patients without a substance use disorder (SUD) documented in their chart at the time of data collection
* The other half of the survey sample (n=20) will include patients who do have an ICD-10 code for SUD in their chart.
* Patient stratification rationale: the intention is to compare experiences and perceptions of stigma among patients who have SUD noted in their EHR and those who do not. This is also to assess stigma among patients who may not have their substance use addressed during a MH visit but who have substance use related health risks and substance use disorders (assessed through the ASSIST questionnaire).

Exclusion Criteria

1. Provider exclusion:

* Providers may be excluded if they were not employed by LSH and seeing patients for the past three months at the time of enrollment.
2. Patient exclusion:

* Patients may be excluded from the SUD-stratified portion of the survey sample if their SUD diagnosis is only for a tobacco use disorder.
* Patients may also be excluded if they are unable or unwilling to give written informed consent.
* Patients who are currently in jail, prison or other overnight facility as required by court of law or have pending legal action that could prevent participation in study activities will also be excluded.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of New Mexico

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Loyola University Chicago

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

LifeStance Health

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Wayne State University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Erin F. Madden

Assistant Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

LifeStance Health

Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

UG1DA049468

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

UG1DA049468 CTN-00137

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Student Wellness 2.0
NCT06804213 COMPLETED NA
Mood Lifters: A Self Help Program
NCT02558075 COMPLETED NA