Anesthesiologist Perspectives/Opinions/Ethics on Intraoperative/Intraprocedural Code Status and Intraoperative/Intraprocedural Code Status Management Plans
NCT ID: NCT05883228
Last Updated: 2023-08-01
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
WITHDRAWN
OBSERVATIONAL
2023-09-30
2025-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The understanding of the perspectives of ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) member staff anesthesiologists and staff anesthesiologists in general on this matter is of critical importance in the field of anesthesiology as the intraoperative/intraprocedural patient population continues to collectively get older and sicker in the future.
Goal/Aims: The goal of this survey is to ascertain the perspectives of all active ASA member staff anesthesiologists and staff anesthesiologists in general on the matters of intraoperative/intraprocedural code status and intraoperative/intraprocedural code status management plans
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Patient Opinions Regarding General Anesthesia, Before and After Having Undergone a Procedure.
NCT05813262
Intraoperative Anesthesia Care Transition Checklist
NCT02453828
Out-patient Discharge Management After General Intravenous Anesthesia
NCT05609383
Conducting Perioperative Code Status and Goals of Care Discussions: A Bi-Institutional Study to Develop a Novel, Evidence-Based Curriculum for Anesthesiology Trainees
NCT04045886
Helsinki Declaration on Patient Safety
NCT01246544
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Goal/Aims: The goal of this survey is to ascertain the perspectives of all active ASA members on the matters of intraoperative/intraprocedural code status and intraoperative/intraprocedural code status management plans.
Sample Size/Scope: All Active ASA member staff anesthesiologists and staff anesthesiologists in general in the United States of America
Face/Construct Validity:
Are the components of the measure (e.g., questions) relevant to what's being measured? Yes, the questions and structure of the questions are relevant for the intended purpose of ascertaining the respondent's perspectives on intraoperative/intraprocedural code status and intraoperative/intraprocedural code status management plans.
Does the measurement method seem useful for measuring the variable? Yes, the questions and structure of the questions are useful for the intended purpose of ascertaining the respondent's perspectives on intraoperative/intraprocedural code status and intraoperative/intraprocedural code status management plans.
Is the measure seemingly appropriate for capturing the variable? Yes, the questions and structure of the questions are appropriate for capturing the intended purpose of ascertaining the respondent's perspectives on intraoperative/intraprocedural code status and intraoperative/intraprocedural code status management plans.
All questions and question structures are consistent and thematically similar to previous studies/research cited.
Kerry Tanner, Chapter 6 - Survey designs, Editor(s): Kirsty Williamson, Graeme Johanson, Research Methods (Second Edition), Chandos Publishing, 2018, Pages 159-192, ISBN 9780081022207, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-102220-7.00006-6.
Geyer ED, Miller R, Kim SS, Tobias JD, Nafiu OO, Tumin D. Quality and Impact of Survey Research Among Anesthesiologists: A Systematic Review. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2020 Aug 25;11:587-599. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S259908. PMID: 32904509; PMCID: PMC7456338.
Sousa VEC, Dunn Lopez K. Towards Usable E-Health. A Systematic Review of Usability Questionnaires. Appl Clin Inform. 2017 May 10;8(2):470-490. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2016-10-R-0170. PMID: 28487932; PMCID: PMC6241759.
Kash BA, Cheon O, Halzack NM, Miller TR. Measuring Team Effectiveness in the Health Care Setting: An Inventory of Survey Tools. Health Serv Insights. 2018 Aug 24;11:1178632918796230. doi: 10.1177/1178632918796230. PMID: 30158825; PMCID: PMC6109848.
Patient Safety/Quality of Care: The results of this survey will be utilized to inform and empower the greater understanding and implementation of practices regarding intraoperative/intraprocedural code status and intraoperative/intraprocedural code status management plans for future policy matters in the field of anesthesiology.
Priority: The understanding of the perspectives of ASA member staff anesthesiologists and staff anesthesiologists in general on this matter is of critical importance in the field of anesthesiology as the intraoperative/intraprocedural patient population continues to collectively get older and sicker in the future.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
OTHER
CROSS_SECTIONAL
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Anesthesiologist
* Clinical Practice in United States of America
Exclusion Criteria
* Inability to access survey instrument
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Joseph Hendrix
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Joseph Hendrix
Associate Professor of Anesthesiology and Pain Management
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Joseph Hendrix, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Texas
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Dallas, Texas, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Clemency MV, Thompson NJ. "Do not resuscitate" (DNR) orders and the anesthesiologist: a survey. Anesth Analg. 1993 Feb;76(2):394-401.
Gu X, Eshkevari L, Powell T, Titus AJ, O'Guin C. Certified Registered Nurse Anesthetists' Management of the Perioperative Do-Not-Resuscitate Order: Evaluating Trends in Required Reconsideration. AANA J. 2021 Dec;89(6):491-499.
Burkle CM, Swetz KM, Armstrong MH, Keegan MT. Patient and doctor attitudes and beliefs concerning perioperative do not resuscitate orders: anesthesiologists' growing compliance with patient autonomy and self determination guidelines. BMC Anesthesiol. 2013 Jan 15;13:2. doi: 10.1186/1471-2253-13-2.
Hiestand D, Beaman M. Perioperative Do-Not-Resuscitate Suspension: The Patient's Perspective. AORN J. 2019 Mar;109(3):326-334. doi: 10.1002/aorn.12612.
Baumann M, Killebrew S, Zimnicki K, Balint K. Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders in the Perioperative Environment: A Multidisciplinary Quality Improvement Project. AORN J. 2017 Jul;106(1):20-30. doi: 10.1016/j.aorn.2017.05.002.
Kim C, Keneally R. The Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) order in the perioperative setting: practical considerations. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2021 Apr 1;34(2):141-144. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000000974.
Baldor DJ, Smyrnios NA, Faris K, Guilarte-Walker Y, Celik U, Torres U. A Controlled Study in CPR-Survival in Propensity Score Matched Full-Code and Do-Not-Resuscitate ICU Patients. J Intensive Care Med. 2022 Oct;37(10):1363-1369. doi: 10.1177/08850666221114052. Epub 2022 Jul 11.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
STU-2023-0329
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
STU-2023-0329
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.