Intraoperative Anesthesia Care Transition Checklist

NCT ID: NCT02453828

Last Updated: 2019-04-10

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

7348 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-06-30

Study Completion Date

2018-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Perioperative management decisions must often be made quickly and rely on practitioners having relevant facts at hand. During transitions of patient care between anesthesia providers, known as "handovers," information may not be completely or faithfully communicated, consequently impairing the provider's ability to intervene correctly in response to subsequent events. Checklists have consistently proven to be effective at enhancing communications during handovers, but whether anesthesia checklists improve patient outcomes has yet to be proven. The investigators propose to randomize intraoperative anesthesia provider handovers to standard practice (no specific format) or to a handover checklist presented by a decision-support system in conjunction with the investigators electronic record. Specifically, the investigators will test the hypothesis that incorporating a largely pre-populated handover checklist into transitions of intraoperative anesthesia care decreases a composite of mortality and serious cardiovascular, respiratory, gastrointestinal, urinary, and infectious complications.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The modern team-based approached to patient care often involves transitioning care between providers. Critical details may be lost during transition, or handovers, resulting in delays, inefficiencies, suboptimal care, or even patient harm. The Joint Commission on Hospital Accreditation declared that communication failures are the root cause of almost two-thirds of all sentinel events. The World Health Organization similarly listed "communication during patient care handover" as one of the highest patient safety initiatives. The consequence of ineffectual communication may be especially detrimental during surgery when patients are often unstable and post-handover decisions must be made quickly and accurately. In a preliminary study the investigators observed an 8% increase in odds of experiencing major in-hospital morbidity or mortality per for each intraoperative handover.

Checklists have been used for transitions of care in a variety of areas; orthopedic trauma, urological robotic surgeries, and emergency departments. The field of anesthesia has also embraced the use of checklists, especially in the handover to intensive care units. Post-anesthesia checklists have been the particular focus of anesthesia providers in recent years. Post-operative checklists clearly enhance information transfer, but have only been evaluated using historical controls which do not account for bias. The anesthesia area most lacking valid studies is intraoperative handovers.

Anesthesia-specific intraoperative handovers differ because the interaction is primarily between anesthesia providers while surgery continues without disruption. To date, there has only been one proposed checklist for intraoperative handovers between anesthesia providers and it has not been prospectively evaluated. A randomized study with contemporaneous controls, utilizing an anesthesia specific, electronically pre-populated checklist measuring objective "hard" outcomes will address the limitations of previous studies.

The investigators propose to test the hypothesis that incorporating an electronic handover checklist during transitions of intraoperative anesthesia care reduces serious complications. Specifically, the investigators will quantify the effect of a handover checklist on adverse outcomes as defined by a composite of mortality and serious cardiovascular, respiratory, gastrointestinal, urinary, and infectious complications.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Postoperative Complications

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Checklist

after non-cardiac surgery, patients will have current standard-of-care anesthesia handover during anesthesia transitions in care with an additional, electronically pre-populated checklist displayed on the anesthesia record keeping system

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Non-cardiac surgery

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

patients having non-cardiac surgery

Standard of Care

after non-cardiac surgery, patients will have current standard-of-care anesthesia handover during anesthesia transitions in care

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Non-cardiac surgery

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

patients having non-cardiac surgery

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Non-cardiac surgery

patients having non-cardiac surgery

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* non-cardiac surgery

Exclusion Criteria

* under 18 years of age
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

The Cleveland Clinic

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Leif Saager, M.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

The Cleveland Clinic

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Cleveland Clinic Foundation

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

15-192

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.