Establishment of Emergency Surgery Triage and Checklist Management System
NCT ID: NCT06501157
Last Updated: 2025-03-06
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
60 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2024-06-01
2025-12-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
What information is necessary for effective patient triage and handovers between the emergency department, anesthesia, and ICU for surgical patients? How effective and feasible is a standardized handover process in improving patient outcomes and safety?
Participants will:
Be observed and have their handovers documented to identify key information required.
Participate in implementing a new handover checklist and triage system.
Researchers will compare the periods before and after implementing the new system to see if it:
Reduces missed critical information during handovers. Decreases pre-surgery waiting times for critically ill patients. Improves overall patient safety and outcomes, including reducing postoperative complications, mortality rates, length of hospital stay, and medical costs.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Retrospective Study on Perioperative Safety and Quality Control Based on Real World Data
NCT06003517
Team Familiarity and Perioperative Outcomes in Non-Cardiac Surgery
NCT07065812
Intraoperative Handover Checklist of Anesthesia Care Improves Outcomes Among Patients Undergoing Major Surgery
NCT03597932
Predictive Model for Postoperative Mortality
NCT02947789
Validation of the QoR-15 Score for Emergency Surgery
NCT04845763
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Phase 1: Literature Review and Initial Assessment First, a comprehensive review of existing literature and past emergency surgery cases will be conducted to identify common issues and best practices.
Phase 2: Expert Panel and Delphi Process An expert panel consisting of hospital management staff, anesthesiologists, emergency surgeons, ICU intensivists, and ER doctors will be formed. This panel will engage in a Delphi process to discuss and develop a standardized system for managing emergency surgery patients.
Phase 3: System Implementation and Testing
The newly developed system will be implemented and tested. Key metrics to be documented, evaluated, and compared include:
The number of omitted information items during the emergency-anesthesia handover.
Staff satisfaction with the new handover process across the emergency department, general surgery, anesthesia, and ICU.
In-hospital mortality rate after surgery. Postoperative in-hospital complications, classified by Clavien-Dindo grading, and their incidence rate.
Patient waiting times, including time to theatre and time to incision. Duration of the handover process. Incidence of follow-up calls to inquire about additional information after the handover.
Phase 4: Evaluation and Comparison The effectiveness and feasibility of the new system will be evaluated by comparing the collected data before and after its implementation. This comparison will help determine the system\'s impact on improving patient outcomes, safety, and staff efficiency.
By systematically addressing the critical points of patient handovers and emergency surgery management, this study aims to enhance overall healthcare quality and patient safety in emergency surgical settings.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
after implementation
Patients undergoing emergency surgery at Peking Union Medical College Hospital after Emergency Surgery Triage and Checklist Management System
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients whose condition is critical before surgery, requiring admission to the resuscitation room, emergency observation, or other hospital wards for treatment.
Exclusion Criteria
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Peking Union Medical College Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Peking Union Medical College Hospital
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
I-24PJ1128
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.