Comparative Analysis Using the Collagen Matrix and Autogenous Graft: Clinical Course, Aesthetic Results

NCT ID: NCT05870774

Last Updated: 2025-09-26

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

52 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-10-28

Study Completion Date

2023-05-18

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This was an interventional prospective randomized clinical trial (RCT) in parallel groups. The sample size is 32 patients who were randomly divided into two groups depending on the surgical intervention used. First group - patients underwent increasing the thickness of the mucous membrane using free connective tissue graft from tuberosity area of the upper jaw. Second group - patients used collagen matrix Fibro-Gide" (Geistlich Pharma AG, Bahnhofstrasse 40, 6110 Wolhusen, Switzerland; registration in Russia 19.08.2020 No FSZ -20207/11765). In the postoperative period the value of soft tissue thickness gain, severity of pain, collateral edema, amount of analgesics consumed, soft tissue aesthetics, keratinized mucosa width, quality of life and duration of surgery were assessed.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The aim of this research was to perform a comparative clinical analysis of soft tissues in the area of soft tissue graft and collagen matrix transplantation. Thirty two patients diagnosed with partial absence of teeth was examined on the basis of the Department of Surgical Dentistry of the E.V. Borovsky Institute of Dentistry of I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University. Patients had a soft tissue thickness deficiency from the vestibular surface in the area of the planned dental implant placement in the distal parts of the mandible, which was an indication for its increase. All patients were randomly divided into two groups depending on method of soft tissue augmentation used. In 1 group (n=16) transplantation of a free connective tissue graft (CTG) from tuberosity area of the upper jaw was performed. In 2 group (n=16) collagen matrix "Fibro-Gide" was used. According to gender and age characteristics, both groups were comparable. Randomization of patients was carried out at the stage of surgical intervention as follows: after a dental implant placement and preparation of recipient's bed, an envelope with a randomly assigned treatment method (using a connective tissue graft or a collagen matrix) was opened.

During the operation, incision was made along the top of the alveolar ridge within the defect; a full-thickness muco-periosteal flap was elevated. Traditional 2-stage dental implantation was performed according to surgical protocols of dental implant systems Astra Tech (Dentsply Implants Manufacturing GmbH, Germany; registration in Russia 27.12.2019 No FSZ 2015/3214). A free connective tissue graft was harvested in patients of the first group. Graft was fixed with a horizontal U-shaped suture to the buccal muco-periosteal flap. In second patients group a fragment of the collagen matrix "Fibro-Gide" was fixed to the buccal muco-periosteal flap (Geistlich Pharma AG, Bahnhofstrasse 40, 6110 Wolhusen, Switzerland; registration in Russia 19.08.2020 No FSZ - 20207/11765). For patients of all groups mobilization of the muco-periosteal flap conducted followed by suturing the wound tightly without tension with simple interrupted sutures.

Postoperative recommendations included standard antibacterial and anti-inflammatory therapy in combination with the use of local antiseptics for daily care was prescribed.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Soft Tissue Atrophy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

First group

The patients underwent implant placement in combination with an increase in the thickness of soft tissues using a free connective tissue graft from the tuberosity area of the upper jaw

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Soft tissue augmentation with CTG

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

1. Incision the mucosa at the alveolar ridge, mucosal-periosteal flap elevation
2. Placement of the Astra Tech dental implant (Dentsply, Germany)
3. Harvesting of free connective tissue graft from the maxilla tuberosity area
4. Fixation of the graft to the vestibular mucosal-periosteal flap
5. Suturing the wound tightly

Second group

The patients underwent implant placement in combination with an increase in the thickness of soft tissues using collagen matrix "Fibro-Gide"

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Soft tissue augmentation with CM

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

1. Incision the mucosa at the alveolar ridge, mucosal-periosteal flap elevation
2. Placement of the Astra Tech dental implant (Dentsply, Germany)
3. Modeling of sterile collagen matrix according to the shape of the recipient bed
4. Fixation of the collagen matrix to the vestibular mucosal-periosteal flap
5. Suturing the wound tightly

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Soft tissue augmentation with CTG

1. Incision the mucosa at the alveolar ridge, mucosal-periosteal flap elevation
2. Placement of the Astra Tech dental implant (Dentsply, Germany)
3. Harvesting of free connective tissue graft from the maxilla tuberosity area
4. Fixation of the graft to the vestibular mucosal-periosteal flap
5. Suturing the wound tightly

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Soft tissue augmentation with CM

1. Incision the mucosa at the alveolar ridge, mucosal-periosteal flap elevation
2. Placement of the Astra Tech dental implant (Dentsply, Germany)
3. Modeling of sterile collagen matrix according to the shape of the recipient bed
4. Fixation of the collagen matrix to the vestibular mucosal-periosteal flap
5. Suturing the wound tightly

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. The presence of written informed consent of the patient to participate in the study;
2. Age from 25 to 59 years;
3. The presence of an included defect in the distal part of the lower jaw with a sufficient volume of bone tissue;
4. Soft tissue thickness \<3 mm on the vestibular side;
5. Adjacent teeth without periodontal pathology, the depth of probing should not exceed 3 mm along the entire dentoalveolar furrow;
6. Satisfactory level of oral hygiene;
7. Patients without concomitant pathology or with concomitant pathology in the compensation stage.


1. Age less than 25 and more than 59 years;
2. Hard smokers (more than 10 cigarettes a day);
3. The presence of concomitant pathology in the stage of decompensation;
4. Patients with malignant tumors, as well as patients with a history of radiation and chemotherapy over the past 5 years;
5. Taking medications that affect the healing of soft tissues (nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, steroid drugs);
6. Pregnancy and breastfeeding;
7. Patients with mental disorders.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Patients with infections either periodontally or periapically, which developed after inclusion in the study;
2. Pregnancy following entrance into the study;
3. Patients having poor oral hygiene or not wanting to carry out oral hygiene measures;
4. Patients who, for one reason or another, could not complete the entire protocol to the end.
Minimum Eligible Age

25 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

59 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Igor Ashurko, ass.prof.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Russia

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Ashurko I, Tarasenko S, Magdalyanova M, Balyasin M, Galyas A, Kazumyan S, Safi N, Unkovskiy A. 3D-Analysis of Peri-Implant Soft Tissue Gain With Collagen Matrix and Connective Tissue Graft: A Randomized Control Trial. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2025 Apr;27(2):e70043. doi: 10.1111/cid.70043.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 40254798 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

AI-02

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.