A Comparison Study of the Perclose Proglide (TM) SMC System Versus Figure-of-8- Suture Technique for Closure of Large-bore Femoral Venous Access.
NCT ID: NCT05859503
Last Updated: 2023-05-17
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
200 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2023-05-16
2023-09-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Suture-mediated Closure System Following Endovascular Peripheral Arterial Procedures
NCT05899478
Angioplasty + SBCV vs. Angioplasty Alone for Femoropopliteal Artery Stenosis
NCT02568293
Embolization Procedures in the Peripheral Vasculature Using the Magellan™ Robotic System
NCT02369692
PerQseal®+ Early Feasibility Study
NCT05163548
Evaluation of Safety and Efficacy of the S.M.A.R.T. RADIANZ™ Vascular Stent System in the Treatment of Iliac and Femoropopliteal Lesions Via Transradial Access
NCT05399680
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The study's goal is to determine if there are significant differences in terms of efficacy and safety between the two closure strategies. Figure-of-8 suture compression is a well-established technique that has been used for decades to close large-bore femoral venous access, while the Perclose-Proglide system is a relatively new medical device that could have great utility for the closure of large-bore femoral venous access. By comparing these two strategies, researchers hope to determine the safety and effectiveness of the Perclose-Proglide system for closing large-bore femoral venous access in patients undergoing percutaneous procedures.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_ONLY
RETROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Perclose-Proglide system
Closure Strategy with Perclose-Proglide system
Patients who have required Perclose-Proglide system in Percutaneous Interventional Procedure
Figure-of-8
Closure Strategy with figure-of-8
Patients who have required the manual compression with figure-of-8 in Percutaneous Interventional Procedure
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Closure Strategy with Perclose-Proglide system
Patients who have required Perclose-Proglide system in Percutaneous Interventional Procedure
Closure Strategy with figure-of-8
Patients who have required the manual compression with figure-of-8 in Percutaneous Interventional Procedure
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients who have undergone percutaneous interventional procedures
* Patients in whom the procedures have been performed with femoral venous access
* Patients who have required large caliber pods ≥ 14 French.
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients who have required ipsilateral arterial access with a large caliber ≥ 14 French
* Patients with previous vascular surgery.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron Research Institute
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hospital Universitari Vall D'Hebron
Barcelona, , Spain
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Hamid T, Rajagopal R, Pius C, Clarke B, Mahadevan VS. Preclosure of large-sized venous access sites in adults undergoing transcatheter structural interventions. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Mar;81(4):586-90. doi: 10.1002/ccd.24358. Epub 2012 Nov 8.
Jensen CJ, Schnur M, Lask S, Attanasio P, Gotzmann M, Kara K, Hanefeld C, Mugge A, Wutzler A. Feasibility of the Figure-of-8-Suture as Venous Closure in Interventional Electrophysiology: One Strategy for All? Int J Med Sci. 2020 Apr 6;17(7):965-969. doi: 10.7150/ijms.42593. eCollection 2020.
Mohanty S, Trivedi C, Beheiry S, Al-Ahmad A, Horton R, Della Rocca DG, Gianni C, Gasperetti A, Abdul-Moheeth M, Turakhia M, Natale A. Venous access-site closure with vascular closure device vs. manual compression in patients undergoing catheter ablation or left atrial appendage occlusion under uninterrupted anticoagulation: a multicentre experience on efficacy and complications. Europace. 2019 Jul 1;21(7):1048-1054. doi: 10.1093/europace/euz004.
Pracon R, Bangalore S, Henzel J, Cendrowska-Demkow I, Pregowska-Chwala B, Tarnowska A, Dzielinska Z, Chmielak Z, Witkowski A, Demkow M. A randomized comparison of modified subcutaneous "Z"-stitch versus manual compression to achieve hemostasis after large caliber femoral venous sheath removal. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Jan 1;91(1):105-112. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27003. Epub 2017 Mar 17.
Geis NA, Pleger ST, Chorianopoulos E, Muller OJ, Katus HA, Bekeredjian R. Feasibility and clinical benefit of a suture-mediated closure device for femoral vein access after percutaneous edge-to-edge mitral valve repair. EuroIntervention. 2015 Mar;10(11):1346-53. doi: 10.4244/EIJV10I11A231.
Noori VJ, Eldrup-Jorgensen J. A systematic review of vascular closure devices for femoral artery puncture sites. J Vasc Surg. 2018 Sep;68(3):887-899. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.05.019. Epub 2018 Jun 29.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
PERCLOSE PROGLIDE
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.