Myofascial Release With and Without Support Belt for Sacroiliac Joint Pain in Pregnant Females.
NCT ID: NCT05857839
Last Updated: 2024-03-05
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
30 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-04-01
2023-09-15
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparative Effects of Stabilization Exercises and Muscle Energy Techniques in Sacroiliac Joint Pain
NCT05356390
MFR Versus PFS Techniques on Pain,Range of Motion And Disability in Chronic Non Specific Low Back Pain.
NCT05811260
Effects Of Muscle Energy Technique Versus Mobilization
NCT04790500
Comparison of Muscle Energy Techniques and Myofascial Release on Low Back Pain Due to Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction
NCT05479266
Effects of Antenatal Exercises With Sacroiliac Joint Mobilization in Pregnancy Related Pelvic Girdle Pain
NCT05542888
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Group A of 17 patients will get a myofascial release technique for up to 600 seconds and total treatment sessions will be 12 in 4 weeks with a support belt a support belt should not be worn for longer than two to three hours at a time and it will be used 4 times a week. Group B of 17 patients will also get a myofascial release technique for up to 600 seconds and total treatment sessions will be 12 in 4 weeks but without a support belt. Data will be collected and analyzed at baseline and at 4 weeks follow-up.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Myofascial release with support belt
Group A get myofascial release on sacroiliac joint area for up to 600 seconds and total treatment sessions will be 12 in 4 weeks with support belt and a support belt should not be worn for longer than two to three hours at a time and it will be used 4 times a week.
Myofascial release
Patients will get myofascial release technique to sacroiliac joint area for up to 600 seconds and total treatment sessions will be 12 in 4 weeks
pelvic Support belt
The support belt will be worn for less than two to three hours at a time and it will be used 4 times a week
Myofascial release without support belt:
Group B get myofascial release technique to sacroiliac joint area for up to 600 seconds and total treatment sessions will be 12 in 4 weeks but without support belt. Data will be collected and analyzed at baseline and at 4 weeks follow up.
Myofascial release
Patients will get myofascial release technique to sacroiliac joint area for up to 600 seconds and total treatment sessions will be 12 in 4 weeks
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Myofascial release
Patients will get myofascial release technique to sacroiliac joint area for up to 600 seconds and total treatment sessions will be 12 in 4 weeks
pelvic Support belt
The support belt will be worn for less than two to three hours at a time and it will be used 4 times a week
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* 2nd and 3rd trimesters of pregnancy.
* The diagnosis of SIJ pain based on tenderness localized to the posterior inferior iliac spine bilaterally with provocative maneuvers of the SIJ in posterior pelvic pain provocation/thigh thrust test, compression test, Gaenslen's test and Patrick's Faber test eliciting considerable pain.
* Positive results from at least three of those provocative tests signified the presence of SIJ pain.
Exclusion Criteria
* Lumbar spine disc herniation or back injury.
* Previous lumbar spine surgery.
* High risk pregnancy.
* Any bony or soft tissue systemic disease.
* Malignancy.
20 Years
40 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Riphah International University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Maria Shabbir, MS*
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Riphah International University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Shaikh Zayed Hospital
Lahore, Punjab Province, Pakistan
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Chen Z, Wu J, Wang X, Wu J, Ren Z. The effects of myofascial release technique for patients with low back pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Complement Ther Med. 2021 Jun;59:102737. doi: 10.1016/j.ctim.2021.102737. Epub 2021 May 10.
Laslett M. Evidence-based diagnosis and treatment of the painful sacroiliac joint. J Man Manip Ther. 2008;16(3):142-52. doi: 10.1179/jmt.2008.16.3.142.
Castro-Sanchez AM, Gil-Martinez E, Fernandez-Sanchez M, Lara-Palomo IC, Nastasia I, de Los Angeles Querol-Zaldivar M, Aguilar-Ferrandiz ME. Manipulative therapy of sacral torsion versus myofascial release in patients clinically diagnosed posterior pelvic pain: a consort compliant randomized controlled trial. Spine J. 2021 Nov;21(11):1890-1899. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2021.05.002. Epub 2021 May 13.
Mens JM, Damen L, Snijders CJ, Stam HJ. The mechanical effect of a pelvic belt in patients with pregnancy-related pelvic pain. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2006 Feb;21(2):122-7. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2005.08.016. Epub 2005 Oct 7.
Arguisuelas MD, Lison JF, Sanchez-Zuriaga D, Martinez-Hurtado I, Domenech-Fernandez J. Effects of Myofascial Release in Nonspecific Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2017 May 1;42(9):627-634. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001897.
Bhat P V, Patel VD, Eapen C, Shenoy M, Milanese S. Myofascial release versus Mulligan sustained natural apophyseal glides' immediate and short-term effects on pain, function, and mobility in non-specific low back pain. PeerJ. 2021 Mar 15;9:e10706. doi: 10.7717/peerj.10706. eCollection 2021.
Elden H, Ladfors L, Olsen MF, Ostgaard HC, Hagberg H. Effects of acupuncture and stabilising exercises as adjunct to standard treatment in pregnant women with pelvic girdle pain: randomised single blind controlled trial. BMJ. 2005 Apr 2;330(7494):761. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38397.507014.E0. Epub 2005 Mar 18.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
REC/RCR & AHS/23/0528
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.