MedDataX Logo

Comparison of Regional Manual Therapy and Standard Physical Therapy Intervention in Females With Sacroiliac Joint Pain

NCT ID: NCT05076136

Last Updated: 2021-10-13

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

64 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-11-24

Study Completion Date

2020-11-10

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The SIJ has long been considered an important source of low back pain because of the empirical finding that treatment targeting the SIJ can relieve pain.This study was be a Randomized Clinical Trail conducted at Riphah Rehabilitation Centre Lahore. The study was be completed within the time duration of Six months. Purposive sampling technique was be used. Sample size is calculated by using the G power 3.1. The sample size of 64 patients was be taken in this study to find the comparison of regional manual therapy and standard physiotherapy intervention in females with sacroiliac joint pain. Patients was be divided into two groups.. Patients was be divided into two groups. Group A was be treated with regional manual therapy. In regional manual therapy patients was be given mobilization to lumber region and SIJ, pelvic floor exercises and core strengthening exercises and Group B was be treated with standard physiotherapy in which patients was be given SIJ mobilization and Straight leg raise. Both groups was receive transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulator and heating pad as a common treatment protocol. Numeric pain rating scale (NPRS) and oswestry low back disability questionnaire was be used as Data collecting tools. Two session of treatment per week for eight weeks was be given. Data was be analyzed on SPSS 21.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Sacroiliac; Sprain (Strain)

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Regional treatment

Group A was given regional treatment with baseline treatment protocol

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Regional treatment

Intervention Type OTHER

In reginal treatment patients were given physiotherapy exercises and manual therapies on hip joint as well as on surrounding areas of hip joint such as lumber area and sacroiliac joint.

Standard physiotherapy treatment

Group B was given standard physiotherapy treatment with baseline protocol

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Standard physiotherapy treatment

Intervention Type OTHER

In this treatment patients were given just hip joint mobilizations and quadriceps and hamstrings stretching.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Regional treatment

In reginal treatment patients were given physiotherapy exercises and manual therapies on hip joint as well as on surrounding areas of hip joint such as lumber area and sacroiliac joint.

Intervention Type OTHER

Standard physiotherapy treatment

In this treatment patients were given just hip joint mobilizations and quadriceps and hamstrings stretching.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Females with sacroiliac joint pain
* Age: 20 to 50 years

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients withany red flag signs i.etumor, fracture, metabolic diseases, rheumatoid arthritis, prolonged history of steroids use, etc.
* Females with sciatica
* Females with radiating pain
Minimum Eligible Age

20 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

50 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Riphah International University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Tasneem Shahzadi, Mphil

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Riphah international university Lahore

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Bajwa hospital

Lahore, Punjab Province, Pakistan

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Pakistan

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Forst SL, Wheeler MT, Fortin JD, Vilensky JA. The sacroiliac joint: anatomy, physiology and clinical significance. Pain Physician. 2006 Jan;9(1):61-7.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16700283 (View on PubMed)

5. Merskey H, Bogduk N. Classification of Chronic Pain:Descriptions of Chronic Pain Syndromes and Definitions of Pain Terms. 2nd ed. Seattle, WA: IASP Press; 1994.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

7. Solonen KA: The sacroiliac joint in the light of anatomical, roentgenological and clinical studies. Acta Orthop Scand 1957;27(suppl):1-127 Fortin JD, Dwyer AP, West S, et al: Sacroiliac joint: pain referral maps upon applying a newinjection/arthrography technique: part 1, asymptomatic volunteers. Spine 1994; 19(13):1475-1482

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

REC/RCRS/20/1017

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id