Improving the Cognitive Accessibility of Self-reports for People With ID

NCT ID: NCT05857592

Last Updated: 2024-05-10

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

20 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-07-01

Study Completion Date

2024-05-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

In the proposed study, the investigators aim to investigate whether the existing ABAS-3 self-report questionnaire is suitable to be completed meaningfully by individuals who are perceived as having mild intellectual disability (55\<IQ\<85) based on cognitive impairment. Based on the participants' experiences and researchers' expertise, the investigators develop a 'more inclusive' self-report version. The investigators then look at the extent to which participants indicate that they understand this version better, based on user experiences and limited psychometric research. In doing so, the investigators also compare the outcomes of the self-report and informant-report variant.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Mild Intellectual Disability Borderline Intellectual Functioning

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

A mixed-method repeated-measures design will be used: data are collected using both qualitative and quantitative methods at two points in time (before and after adaptation) from the same participants.
Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Experimental

Persons with Mild Intellectual Disability (MID) or Borderline Intellectual Functioning (BIF) complete the ABAS-3 in assisted form on two occasions: the original version the first time and an adapted version after a few weeks.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Adaptive functioning self-report questionnaire

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

A self-report questionnaire for assessing level of adaptive functioning

Adaptive functioning self-report questionnaire - adapted

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

A self-report questionnaire for assessing level of adaptive functioning, adapted to the communication level of the participant

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Adaptive functioning self-report questionnaire

A self-report questionnaire for assessing level of adaptive functioning

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Adaptive functioning self-report questionnaire - adapted

A self-report questionnaire for assessing level of adaptive functioning, adapted to the communication level of the participant

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age 18 years or older
* Last known Total Intelligence Quotient (TIQ) 55 - 85
* Receiving support from a care organization for persons with ID.
* A care worker who knows the participant for at least a year and knows him well enough tot complete the informant version of the ABAS-3 is available.

Exclusion Criteria

• Severe physical or sensory impairment limiting ability to participate.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Amsterdam

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Zuyd University of Applied Sciences

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Koraal

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Roel Kooijmans

Senior Researcher

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Roel Kooijmans, MSc

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Koraal

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Koraal

Sittard, L, Netherlands

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Netherlands

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Kooijmans, R., Mercera, G., Langdon, P. E., & Moonen, X. (2022). The adaptation of self-report measures to the needs of people with intellectual disabilities: A systematic review. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Koraal-ABAS-Kooijmans

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.