Effect of Block-out Spacer to Pick up Locator Attachments to Retain Overdenture: Peri-implant and Alveolar Bone Changes

NCT ID: NCT05843825

Last Updated: 2023-05-06

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

18 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-01-20

Study Completion Date

2023-01-21

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study was conducted to radiographically evaluate peri-implant and alveolar bone height changes of locator attachments used for three implant assisted mandibular complete overdenture using two different pick up protocols.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This clinical trial was done to evaluate the effect of using block-out spacer during picking up of locator attachments used for retaining 3 implant mandibular complete overdenture regarding peri-implant and alveolar bone height changes.

Eighteen egyptian completely edentulous male patients were chosen from the Outpatient Clinic of the Prosthodontics Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University, Egypt.

Patients received three implants one anterior in midline area and two posterior at first molar area .

Patients free from any systemic diseases relating to the bone resorption, not taking any drugs that interfere with bone quality .Patients with absolute contraindication for surgical implantation, general contraindication , relative contraindication ,local contraindication for surgical implantation , allergic reactions to titanium or to local anesthesia were excluded.

The main question it aims to answer is whether to use block-out spacer during picking up of locator attachments used for retaining 3 implant mandibular complete overdenture or not.

* Participants were given antibiotic prophylaxis (clavulanic acid with amoxicillin 1 gm twice/day) one hour prior to surgery and continued for 6-7 days postoperative .Also, 50 mg of non-steroid anti-inflammatory tablets and analgesic (Declophenac tab) were given twice daily for one week after surgery. In addition to, Antiseptic mouth wash (0.2% chlorohexidine) was started ten minutes before surgery and continued one week after surgery twice daily.
* Patients were asked for radiographic evaluation immediately (T0) and 6 (T6) then 12 months (T12) after picking up of locator attachments.

Researcher compared between Block out spacer group (BOS-G) and Without block out spacer group (WBOS-G)which were randomly assigned into two equal groups to see if using block out spacer during picking up of locator attachments used for retaining 3 implant mandibular complete overdenture is more beneficial regarding peri-implant and alveolar bone height changes or not.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Bone Loss

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Patients were randomly assigned into two equal groups . (BOS-G) Block out spacer group : patients who would be delivered mandibular implant overdenture retained by three locator attachments using block out spacer during pick up .(WBOS-G) Without block out spacer group : patients who would be delivered mandibular implant overdenture retained by three locator attachments without using block out spacer during pick up
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors
The selected patients were stratified according to age, gender, years of mandibular edentulism, number of old non-satisfactory dentures.

Patients were assigned to one of two groups using balanced randomization procedure to ensure comparability between groups.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

(BOS-G) Block out spacer group

(BOS-G)(Control group) : Patients who would be delivered mandibular overdenture retained by three locator attachments picked up using block out spacer .

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Surgical placement of dental implants

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Three dental implants were placed (one anterior in midline area and two posterior at first molar area).

Overdenture supported by locator attachment system

Intervention Type DEVICE

Implants were loaded after three months by using locator attachments.

Control group:Iocator attachments picked up using block out spacer.

Study group:Iocator attachments picked up without using block out spacer

(WBOS-G) Without block out spacer group

(WBOS-G) (Study group): Patients who would be delivered mandibular overdenture retained by three locator attachments picked up without using block out spacer .

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Surgical placement of dental implants

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Three dental implants were placed (one anterior in midline area and two posterior at first molar area).

Overdenture supported by locator attachment system

Intervention Type DEVICE

Implants were loaded after three months by using locator attachments.

Control group:Iocator attachments picked up using block out spacer.

Study group:Iocator attachments picked up without using block out spacer

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Surgical placement of dental implants

Three dental implants were placed (one anterior in midline area and two posterior at first molar area).

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Overdenture supported by locator attachment system

Implants were loaded after three months by using locator attachments.

Control group:Iocator attachments picked up using block out spacer.

Study group:Iocator attachments picked up without using block out spacer

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Good oral hygiene practiced by edentulous patients.
* Completely edentulous maxillary and mandibular arches (at least six months since last extraction) .
* Mandibular residual alveolar ridge mucosa was healthy, firmly attached, well keratinized, free from any ridge flabbiness and even compressible mucosa as detected by palpitation with the blunt end of the mirror .
* Mandibular residual alveolar ridge form was U-shaped with accepted bone width, height and density as assessed by cone beam computed tomography.
* Angle's class I maxillo-mandibular relationship.
* Sufficient restorative space vertically not less than (8.5mm) and horizontally not less than (9 mm) which were verified by tentative jaw relation record and mounting on the articulator .

Exclusion Criteria

* Systemic diseases relating to the bone resorption(e.g. osteoporosis , uncontrolled diabetes, osteogenesis imperfecta…etc).
* Administrated drugs that interfere with bone quality (e.g. corticosteroids, thyroxin, levothyroxine... etc).
* Patients with absolute contraindication for surgical implantation (recent myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular accident, valvular prosthesis surgery, immunosuppression, bleeding issues….etc).
* General contraindication for surgical procedures such as patient with head and neck radiotherapy and hepatic patients.
* Patients with relative contraindication: history of para functional habits such as bruxism, clenching and bad habits such as smoking and alcoholism .
* Local contraindication for surgical implantation (close proximity to vital structure, pathological lesion, remaining root not indicated for removal , localized bone defects or poor bone quality (D4)).
* Allergic reactions to titanium or to local anesthesia
Minimum Eligible Age

50 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

MALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Mansoura University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Rahma elhussany mohammed

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Rahma El Hussany, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Mansoura University Faculty of Dentistry Prosthodontics Department

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Rahma El Hussany

Al Mansurah, , Egypt

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

M11071020

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.