The ARRC III Trial of Advanced Recovery Room Care (ARRC).

NCT ID: NCT05836285

Last Updated: 2024-08-14

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Total Enrollment

3000 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-04-18

Study Completion Date

2025-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

A postoperative high-acuity model of care (ARRC) has been shown, in a prospective cohort study of approximately 850 patients, to produce a marked improvement in patient and hospital outcomes, and hospital costs, in medium risk patients (Ludbrook G et al., JAMA Surgery 2023).

The goal of this observational study is to examine the outcomes after non-cardiac surgery of a larger group of medium risk patients receiving different forms of care -ARRC and usual ward care. The main questions it aims to answer are:

what are the outcomes for patients and hospital after the different forms of care, who receives benefit from high acuity care, what underlies the improved outcomes seen with high acuity care.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Demand for essential surgery is growing, yet we face an increasingly complex casemix and budget challenges. New paradigms to deliver high value care are essential.

Advanced Recovery Room Care (ARRC) is a model of care which, at RAH, has been shown to provide substantial improvements in patient outcomes, hospital utilisation, and costs of care. Specifically, it showed when compared to usual ward care: improved Days at Home after Surgery (primary outcome), decreased in-hospital complications, and decreased mortality at 1, 3 and 12 months. This model was cost-effective compared to usual ward care: ICER of approximately -$250 per DAH

It is essential to collect high quality data on this model relevant to consumers and hospitals, in order to:

* provide a robust mechanism to ensure outcomes are maintained, and ideally improved, within our institution
* provide a mechanism to potentially allow benchmarking in the future, across institutions
* better identify which surgical subgroups receive benefit from ARRC
* provide a resource to generate and test hypotheses as to how these benefits are achieved.

To that end, the ARRC II study database is to be refined to function in essence as an ongoing registry.

This will be initially piloted at RAH, the subject of this study.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Post-Surgical Complication Economic Problems

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Medium risk patients undergoing surgery

Patients undergoing surgery designated as medium risk using NSQIP risk scores

ARRC

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligible for ARRC and managed in ARRC unit

Usual Care

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligible for ARRC but managed elsewhere as no ARRC bed available

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

ARRC

Eligible for ARRC and managed in ARRC unit

Intervention Type OTHER

Usual Care

Eligible for ARRC but managed elsewhere as no ARRC bed available

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Scheduled for elective or unplanned surgery
* Scheduled to stay in hospital at least one night after surgery
* 30-day mortality of 0.5% to 8% by the US National Safety and Quality Improvement Program risk score (NSQIP)

Exclusion Criteria

* Undergoing cardiac surgery
* Scheduled for postoperative Intensive Care Unit management
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Royal Adelaide Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Adelaide

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Guy Ludbrook

Professor of Anaesthesia

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Guy Ludbrook, MBBS PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Professor of Anaesthesia

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Royal Adelaide Hospital

Adelaide, South Australia, Australia

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Australia

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Guy L Ludbrook, MBBS PhD

Role: CONTACT

+61 413817901

Kathy Heyman, RN

Role: CONTACT

+61 8 7074 5044

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Guy L Ludbrook, MBBS PhD

Role: primary

+61413817901

Kathy Heyman, RN

Role: backup

+618 7074 5044

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Ludbrook G, Lloyd C, Story D, Maddern G, Riedel B, Richardson I, Scott D, Louise J, Edwards S. The effect of advanced recovery room care on postoperative outcomes in moderate-risk surgical patients: a multicentre feasibility study. Anaesthesia. 2021 Apr;76(4):480-488. doi: 10.1111/anae.15260. Epub 2020 Oct 7.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 33027534 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

17557

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

I CAN DO Surgical ACP
NCT06090552 RECRUITING NA