The ARRC III Trial of Advanced Recovery Room Care (ARRC).
NCT ID: NCT05836285
Last Updated: 2024-08-14
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
3000 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2023-04-18
2025-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The goal of this observational study is to examine the outcomes after non-cardiac surgery of a larger group of medium risk patients receiving different forms of care -ARRC and usual ward care. The main questions it aims to answer are:
what are the outcomes for patients and hospital after the different forms of care, who receives benefit from high acuity care, what underlies the improved outcomes seen with high acuity care.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Impact of Augmented Reality During Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy
NCT06059859
Analysis of Immediate Urinary Continence Predictors After RS-RARP
NCT06850116
Early DVC Ligation and Urinary Continence Recovery After RARP
NCT03368378
Impact of Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Technique on Short-term Continence Recovery
NCT02352103
Trial to Compare Urinary Continence Recovery After Robotic Radical Prostatectomy With or Without Rhabdosphincter Reconstruction.
NCT03302169
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Advanced Recovery Room Care (ARRC) is a model of care which, at RAH, has been shown to provide substantial improvements in patient outcomes, hospital utilisation, and costs of care. Specifically, it showed when compared to usual ward care: improved Days at Home after Surgery (primary outcome), decreased in-hospital complications, and decreased mortality at 1, 3 and 12 months. This model was cost-effective compared to usual ward care: ICER of approximately -$250 per DAH
It is essential to collect high quality data on this model relevant to consumers and hospitals, in order to:
* provide a robust mechanism to ensure outcomes are maintained, and ideally improved, within our institution
* provide a mechanism to potentially allow benchmarking in the future, across institutions
* better identify which surgical subgroups receive benefit from ARRC
* provide a resource to generate and test hypotheses as to how these benefits are achieved.
To that end, the ARRC II study database is to be refined to function in essence as an ongoing registry.
This will be initially piloted at RAH, the subject of this study.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Medium risk patients undergoing surgery
Patients undergoing surgery designated as medium risk using NSQIP risk scores
ARRC
Eligible for ARRC and managed in ARRC unit
Usual Care
Eligible for ARRC but managed elsewhere as no ARRC bed available
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
ARRC
Eligible for ARRC and managed in ARRC unit
Usual Care
Eligible for ARRC but managed elsewhere as no ARRC bed available
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Scheduled to stay in hospital at least one night after surgery
* 30-day mortality of 0.5% to 8% by the US National Safety and Quality Improvement Program risk score (NSQIP)
Exclusion Criteria
* Scheduled for postoperative Intensive Care Unit management
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Royal Adelaide Hospital
OTHER
University of Adelaide
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Guy Ludbrook
Professor of Anaesthesia
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Guy Ludbrook, MBBS PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Professor of Anaesthesia
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Royal Adelaide Hospital
Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Ludbrook G, Lloyd C, Story D, Maddern G, Riedel B, Richardson I, Scott D, Louise J, Edwards S. The effect of advanced recovery room care on postoperative outcomes in moderate-risk surgical patients: a multicentre feasibility study. Anaesthesia. 2021 Apr;76(4):480-488. doi: 10.1111/anae.15260. Epub 2020 Oct 7.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
17557
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.