Correlation Between Preoperative Knee Extension Lag and Functional Outcome After Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT ID: NCT05833152
Last Updated: 2025-06-03
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
48 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2023-05-01
2024-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Functional Knee Phenotypes of Patients Operated on for Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT05380206
The Correlation Between Femoral Component Implanting Flexion Angle and Posterior Condyle Offset in Cruciate Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT05477745
The Difference of Angle of Femoral Component Rotation in TKA With Gap Balance and Measured Resection Technique
NCT03358381
Effects of Total Knee Replacement on Early Postoperative Cognitive Function in Elderly Patients
NCT02387541
Preoperative Rehabilitation Training and Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
NCT06983912
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Subjects were recruited and perioperative baseline data were collected: ① Demographic information, including age, sex, height, weight, affected knee, etc. ②Body structure and function: joint motion, knee extension hysteresis angle, pain NRS, WOMAC assessment, and ultrasonic knee extension mechanism were measured before and 3 days after surgery.
2. Postoperative follow-up
The patients were followed up for 3 months, and 6 weeks /3 months after surgery was selected as the follow-up node. The follow-up included postoperative range of motion, knee extension hysteresis Angle, pain NRS, WOMAC assessment, ultrasonic measuring knee extension mechanism, TUG Test (Timed Up-to-go Test), isometric muscle force test, balance postural graph, gait analysis, etc.
3. Data analysis
1. Multi-factor regression analysis was performed to determine the main outcome indicators of WOMAC evaluation at 3-month follow-up, including range of motion, Angle of knee extension hysteria, pain NRS, ultrasonic knee extension device, TUG Test (Timed Up-to-go Test), isoktatic muscle force test, balance postural graph and secondary outcome indicators of gait analysis. The perioperative knee extension hysteresis Angle was used as the independent variable to construct the postoperative regression model of knee function.
2. According to the Angle of knee extension hysteresis in perioperative period, patients were divided into 4 groups: ≤5°, 5-10°11-15°, ≥15°, The results of range of motion, knee extension hysteresis Angle, pain NRS, WOMAC score, ultrasonic knee extension device, TUG Test (Timed Up to go Test), iso-tachykinesis test, balance postural mapping and gait analysis were compared among all groups 3 months after surgery.
4. Study outcome
Follow-up was completed; The patient underwent revision surgery for knee osteoarthritis. The patient dropped out of the trial for personal reasons; Other unforeseen circumstances prevented the patient from continuing the trial.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
<5°
total knee arthroplasty
To observe the postoperative functional outcome of patients with knee extension lag at different angles
5-10°
total knee arthroplasty
To observe the postoperative functional outcome of patients with knee extension lag at different angles
10-15°
total knee arthroplasty
To observe the postoperative functional outcome of patients with knee extension lag at different angles
≥15°
total knee arthroplasty
To observe the postoperative functional outcome of patients with knee extension lag at different angles
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
total knee arthroplasty
To observe the postoperative functional outcome of patients with knee extension lag at different angles
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
45 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Peking University Third Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Yang yanyan
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Peking University Third Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Peking University Third Hospital
Beijing, , China
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
McGinn TL, Etcheson JI, Gwam CU, George NE, Mohamed NS, Mistry JB, Ananaba U, Bhave A. Short-term outcomes for total knee arthroplasty patients with active extension lag. Ann Transl Med. 2018 Jun;6(11):204. doi: 10.21037/atm.2018.05.38.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
M2022846
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.