Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
145 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2023-06-15
2024-04-15
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
* translation of the mBI into Italian, by using the froward-backward translation approach, to produce a pre-final mBI-Italian
* pre-pilot testing of the pre-final mBI-Italian in a sample of ten health professionals (physicians and physiotherapists), ten subjects who had a stroke, and 10 caregivers, i.e. subjects who take care of a person who had a stroke. All participants will be asked to judge the clarity of each item of the scale, including scoring instructions
* evaluation of the metric properties (internal consistency, inter- and intra-rater reliability, validity and responsiveness) of the final mBI-Italian in a sample of subjects admitted to the Don Gnocchi Foundation in Florence for rehabilitation after stroke
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Italian Version of the Motricity Index
NCT05828160
Translation, Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Italian Version of Functional Rating Index in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain
NCT06793254
Predictive Variables of Outcome in Subjects With Chronic Rachialgia Referred to Different Pathways of Physiotherapy.
NCT06915896
What Concept of Manual Therapy is More Effective?
NCT05559021
Pain Education, Motivational Interviewing and Exercise in Chronic Neck Pain
NCT05785455
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
A pre-final mBI-Italian will be produced following established international guidelines (forward-backward translation, each step involving two different translators). This version will be tested in a group of ten health professionals (physicians and physiotherapists), ten subjects who had a stroke and ten caregivers, All participants will be asked to judge the clarity of each item of the scale, including scoring instructions, using a dichotomous response (clear/unclear). Items that are judged unclear by more than 20 percent of evaluators will be revised by the multidisciplinary translation team to produce the final mBI-Italian.
The final mBI-Italian will then be administered to a sample of at least 100 subjects with stroke to assess its metric properties in this population. Participants will be enrolled among patients admitted to the Don Gnocchi Foundation in Florence for stroke rehabilitation. To assess reliability, upon admission each patient will be independently assessed using the mBI-Italian by two examiners, drawn at random from a group of ten physiotherapists. One of the two raters will administer the scale twice on consecutive days. Other evaluators will administer other clinical scales (Fugl-Meyer assessment, FMA; modified Rankin scale, mRS) to assess the validity of the mBI-Italian. All raters will be blinded to all other assessments and to their previous assessment, if any. All the scales will be administered again at discharge, when participants will also be asked to indicate the perceived change since admission in their ability to autonomously manage the basic activities of daily living (ADLs). For the latter, a 7-points Global Rating of Perceived Change (GRPC) Lickert scale will be used.
The Cronbach's alpha will be used to estimate the internal consistency of the scale. To assess intra-rater and inter-rater reliability, the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC1,1), Standard Error of the Measurement (SEM) and Minimal Detectable Change with 95% Confidence (MDC95) will be computed. Criterion and construct validity will be assessed by computing the association between the mBI-Italian and the FMA and the mRS, at both admission and discharge. For responsiveness, the following indices will be calculated: 1) Guyatt Responsiveness Index (GRI); 2) Standardized Response Mean (SMR), both in the whole sample and in subgroups of participants with different outcome (improved, unchanged, worsened) based on the GPRC; 3) Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID). The latter will be derived using the ROC curve approach, using the patient's perceived change in his/her autonomy in basic ADLs as an anchor.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
OTHER
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Being a physician or a physiotherapist with at least three
* years of experience in the functional assessment of subjects with stroke;
* willingness to participate in the study.
Subjects who had a stroke:
* age 18 years or older
* stroke outcomes such that they impact the person's ability to independently perform various basic activities of daily living
* willingness to participate in the study, with informed consent signed (by the support administrator/legal guardian, if necessary)
Caregivers:
* age 18 years or older;
* Being a person who takes care of a disabled subject who had a stroke;
* willingness to participate in the study,
* age 18 years or older
* stroke outcomes such that they impact the person's
* ability to independently perform various basic activities of daily living
* willingness to participate in the study, with informed consent signed (by the support administrator/legal guardian, if necessary)
Exclusion Criteria
Subjects who had a stroke:
* severe visual and/or auditory impairment that cannot be corrected
* cognitive impairment defined by a Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) score \<21;
* severe language impairment such that comprehension and performance of the task is prevented
* presence of signs of clinical instability, defined by a score greater than zero on the Clinical Instability Scale
Caregivers:
* severe visual and/or auditory impairment that cannot be corrected
* cognitive impairment defined by a Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) score \<21
* severe language impairment such that comprehension and performance of the task is prevented.
B) Study on the metric properties of the final mBI-Italian:
1. Participants (subjects who had a stroke): all patients consecutively admitted to the Don Gnocchi Foundation of Florence for rehabilitation after stroke (until the expected sample size is completed) who meet the following criteria.
* severe visual and/or auditory impairment that cannot be corrected
* cognitive impairment defined by a Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) score \<21
* severe language impairment such that comprehension and performance of the task is prevented
* presence of signs of clinical instability, defined by a score greater than zero on the Clinical Instability Scale
2. Raters: ten physiotherapists with at least three years of experience in the evaluation and treatment of subjects with stroke outcomes. Pairs of raters, equal in number to the number of patients enrolled, will be randomly drawn from this group, and each pair will be randomly assigned to a patient to be administered the mBI-IT. Other examiners, also randomly drawn from the list of ten raters, will administer other clinical scales to participants to assess the validity of the mBI-IT.
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi Onlus
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Dec 15;25(24):3186-91. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014. No abstract available.
Cecchi F, Cassio A, Lavezzi S, Scarponi F, Gatta G, Montis A, Bernucci C, Franceschini M, Bargellesi S, Paolucci S, Taricco M. Redefining a minimal assessment protocol for stroke rehabilitation: the new "Protocollo di Minima per l'ICtus" (PMIC2020). Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2021 Oct;57(5):669-676. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.21.06638-7. Epub 2021 May 27.
MAHONEY FI, BARTHEL DW. FUNCTIONAL EVALUATION: THE BARTHEL INDEX. Md State Med J. 1965 Feb;14:61-5. No abstract available.
Shah S, Vanclay F, Cooper B. Improving the sensitivity of the Barthel Index for stroke rehabilitation. J Clin Epidemiol. 1989;42(8):703-9. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(89)90065-6.
Sousa VD, Rojjanasrirat W. Translation, adaptation and validation of instruments or scales for use in cross-cultural health care research: a clear and user-friendly guideline. J Eval Clin Pract. 2011 Apr;17(2):268-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01434.x. Epub 2010 Sep 28.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
mBI - MI - part B
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.