Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Surgery and External Oblique Intercostal Block
NCT ID: NCT05822479
Last Updated: 2024-07-03
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
60 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-04-20
2024-05-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
EOIB for Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy
NCT07101835
M-Tapa Block vs External Oblique Intercostal Block for Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Surgery
NCT05939635
Laparoscopic Versus Ultrasound Guided Block in Sleeve Gastrectomy
NCT06253208
Effect of Bilateral Rectointercostal Fascial Plane Block on Postoperative Pain After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy
NCT07253610
Ultrasound-Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block Following Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Surgery
NCT03921970
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The study aims to investigate the effects of the EOIB on postoperative pain in morbidly obese patients who will undergo laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy by comparing it with the control group. It is seen that there are not enough studies on EOIB in the literature. Our study, which the investigators think will contribute to the literature, was planned as a prospective, randomized, controlled, single-blind, parallel-group study.
Patients will be divided into two groups:
Group EOIB :
A bilateral EOIB (60 ml 0.25% bupivacaine + 1:400.000 adrenaline) will be performed. In addition, IV morphine-PCA will be applied postoperatively for 24 hours.
Group Control:
Patients in this group will not receive any block. IV morphine-PCA will be applied postoperatively for 24 hours.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group EOIB
A bilateral EOIB (60 ml, %0.25 bupivacaine, totally) + IV morphine patient-controlled analgesia (PCA)
Bilateral ultrasound guided external oblique intercostal block (EOIB)
Bilateral ultrasound-guided EOIB (total of 60 ml, %0.25 bupivacaine) will be performed + IV morphine PCA
Multimodal analgesia :
Patients are administered iv tenoxicam 20mg and tramadol 100 mg after induction of general anesthesia, iv paracetamol 1 gr and iv morphine 0.05 mg/kg/ideal body weight (IBW) will be administered. Postoperative analgesia: iv paracetamol 1gr every 8 hours and IV PCA of 0,5mg/ml morphine (the bolus dose is 20 µg/kg, the lock-in time of 10 minutes, the 4-hour limit is adjusted to be 80% of the calculated total amount). Rescue analgesia, when necessary (if the resting NRS score is ≥4 despite PCA demand), 25 mg IV meperidine was administered in the recovery unit, and 50 mg intramuscular (IM) meperidine was administered in the ward.
Group Control
IV morphine PCA
Control
Patients in this group will not be performed interfacial plane blocks.
Multimodal analgesia :
Patients are administered iv tenoxicam 20mg and tramadol 100 mg after induction of general anesthesia, iv paracetamol 1 gr and iv morphine 0.05 mg/kg/ideal body weight (IBW) will be administered. Postoperative analgesia: iv paracetamol 1gr every 8 hours and IV PCA of 0,5mg/ml morphine (the bolus dose is 20 µg/kg, the lock-in time of 10 minutes, the 4-hour limit is adjusted to be 80% of the calculated total amount). Rescue analgesia, when necessary (if the resting NRS score is ≥4 despite PCA demand), 25 mg IV meperidine was administered in the recovery unit, and 50 mg IM meperidine was administered in the ward.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Bilateral ultrasound guided external oblique intercostal block (EOIB)
Bilateral ultrasound-guided EOIB (total of 60 ml, %0.25 bupivacaine) will be performed + IV morphine PCA
Multimodal analgesia :
Patients are administered iv tenoxicam 20mg and tramadol 100 mg after induction of general anesthesia, iv paracetamol 1 gr and iv morphine 0.05 mg/kg/ideal body weight (IBW) will be administered. Postoperative analgesia: iv paracetamol 1gr every 8 hours and IV PCA of 0,5mg/ml morphine (the bolus dose is 20 µg/kg, the lock-in time of 10 minutes, the 4-hour limit is adjusted to be 80% of the calculated total amount). Rescue analgesia, when necessary (if the resting NRS score is ≥4 despite PCA demand), 25 mg IV meperidine was administered in the recovery unit, and 50 mg intramuscular (IM) meperidine was administered in the ward.
Control
Patients in this group will not be performed interfacial plane blocks.
Multimodal analgesia :
Patients are administered iv tenoxicam 20mg and tramadol 100 mg after induction of general anesthesia, iv paracetamol 1 gr and iv morphine 0.05 mg/kg/ideal body weight (IBW) will be administered. Postoperative analgesia: iv paracetamol 1gr every 8 hours and IV PCA of 0,5mg/ml morphine (the bolus dose is 20 µg/kg, the lock-in time of 10 minutes, the 4-hour limit is adjusted to be 80% of the calculated total amount). Rescue analgesia, when necessary (if the resting NRS score is ≥4 despite PCA demand), 25 mg IV meperidine was administered in the recovery unit, and 50 mg IM meperidine was administered in the ward.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. American Society of Anesthesiology score II-III
3. Body mass index (BMI) \> 35 kg/m2
4. Patients who will sign the informed consent form
Exclusion Criteria
2. Patients with neuro-psychiatric disease, cognitive impairment, inability to communicate, or a history of drug addiction
3. Presence of any systemic infection or at the injection site
4. Patients taking anticoagulants or having any bleeding disorder (Coagulopathy, International Normalized Ratio (INR) value not within normal limits, thrombocytopenia or platelet dysfunction)
5. Patients with significant cardiovascular, hepatic, renal or endocrine disorders
6. Patients with a history of chronic pain syndromes or receiving chronic pain treatment and a history of opioid use for more than four weeks in the preoperative period
7. Patients using continuous positive airway pressure device due to obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) (symptoms detected by polysomnography and apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) \>5/hour)
8. Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
9. Patients who need intensive care unit after surgery
10. Patients who do not consent/do not want to participate
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Ondokuz Mayıs University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Cengiz KAYA
Principal Investigator, Clinical Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Cengiz KAYA
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Ondokuz Mayıs University Faculty of Medicine
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Ondokuz Mayis Universitesi
Samsun, Atakum, Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Saber AA, Lee YC, Chandrasekaran A, Olivia N, Asarian A, Al-Ayoubi S, DiGregorio R. Efficacy of transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block in pain management after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG): A double-blind randomized controlled trial. Am J Surg. 2019 Jan;217(1):126-132. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2018.07.010. Epub 2018 Aug 1.
Elsharkawy H, Kolli S, Soliman LM, Seif J, Drake RL, Mariano ER, El-Boghdadly K. The External Oblique Intercostal Block: Anatomic Evaluation and Case Series. Pain Med. 2021 Nov 26;22(11):2436-2442. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnab296.
White L, Ji A. External oblique intercostal plane block for upper abdominal surgery: use in obese patients. Br J Anaesth. 2022 May;128(5):e295-e297. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2022.02.011. Epub 2022 Mar 3. No abstract available.
Coskun M, Yardimci S, Arslantas MK, Altun GT, Uprak TK, Kara YB, Cingi A. Subcostal Transversus Abdominis Plane Block for Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy, Is It Worth the Time? Obes Surg. 2019 Oct;29(10):3188-3194. doi: 10.1007/s11695-019-03984-4.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
EOIB2022
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.