Comparison of QLB Block and TAP Block in Morbid Obese Patients

NCT ID: NCT05820620

Last Updated: 2024-02-21

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

124 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-04-20

Study Completion Date

2024-02-21

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Quadratus lumborum block (QLB) and Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks are regional anesthesia techniques that are frequently used to reduce postoperative pain and are an important part of the current analgesic regimen for many abdominal surgeries. In our clinic, researchers perform both blocks to provide postoperative analgesia. The primary aim of our study is to compare the effectiveness of TAP block and QLB block in postoperative pain control in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Secondary outcomes evaluated in this study were to assess postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), time to discharge, and patient satisfaction.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

As the number of obese patients increases, the number of surgeries performed for morbid-obese is also increasing. Pain following bariatric surgery is highly troubling and can lead to increased complication rate, decreased patient satisfaction rate, and prolonging the healing process, increasing the risk of pulmonary complications and the incidence of deep vein thrombosis. Since postoperative recovery is directly related to the severity and duration of pain, it is imperative to reduce postoperative pain as early as possible. Many post-operative methods have been suggested for patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery. Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block is a regional anesthesia technique routinely used to reduce postoperative pain.

Quadratus lumborum block (QLB) and Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks are regional anesthesia techniques that are frequently used to reduce postoperative pain and are an important part of the current analgesic regimen for many abdominal surgeries. Researchers are doing these two blocks in our clinic to provide postoperative analgesia. The aim of our study is to compare the effectiveness of TAP block and QLB block in postoperative pain control in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Secondary outcomes evaluated in this study were to assess postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), time to discharge, and patient satisfaction.

Many methods have been suggested to reduce postoperative abdominal wall pain, such as instillation of local anesthetics at the site of entry, patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), epidural catheterization, and the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDS). It is known that opioid analgesics against acute postoperative pain cause postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) \[3\]. The mean incidence of PONV reported in the early postoperative period in patients undergoing bariatric surgery ranges from 30% to 50% \[4\].

Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block is a routinely used regional anesthesia technique to reduce postoperative pain and is an important part of the current analgesic regimen for many abdominal surgeries \[5\]. A multimodal approach to pain management, with various combinations such as TAP blocks, local anesthetic infiltration and patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) has been suggested as the optimal combination for laparoscopic bariatric surgery \[6\]. Quadratus lumborum block (QLB) is one of the effective and routinely applied blocks in The primary aim of our study is to compare the effectiveness of TAP block and QLB block in postoperative pain control in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Secondary outcomes evaluated in this study were to assess postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), time to discharge, and patient satisfaction.

Method

Researchers planned to perform this study in a randomized controlled design in patients who will undergo laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in the operating room of Biruni University Hospital. After ethics committee approval, patients with BMI\> 35 kg/m2, laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy, ASA I-III, general anesthesia will be applied and patients who agree to participate in the study will be included. Patients younger than 18 years of age with bleeding disorders (INR: 1.2, antithrombotic, antiaggregant drug use, hematological disorders, etc.) that are contraindications for regional anesthesia, and those with infection at the planned skin site, psychiatric or neurological disorders, and substance addictions, will be excluded from the study.

Randomization of patients will be provided through a computer program (software). After randomization, all patients will be brought to the operating room and then put to sleep with the general anesthesia method researchers apply daily. After the patients are routinely anesthesia administration TAP block will be applied to the 1st group, QLB block will be applied to the 2nd group, and no intervention will be performed to the 3rd group as it is the control group. Blocks will be performed with 0.25% bupivacaine under USG. PCA (patient controlled analgesia) will be administered to all patients in the postoperative period to provide analgesia. For rescue analgesia; If the VAS score of the patients reaches a level of \>4 and above in the postoperative period, an additional 2mg IV bolus of morphine will be administered. In cases where it is not sufficient or it is needed again, it will be intervened again with 2 mg morphine until 4 \<VAS VAS score (Preop -Post op 1., 6., 12 and 24 hours) and Patient Satisfaction (Preoperative and 48 hours) (World Health Organization) WHOQOL-BREF Quality of Life Assessment and analgesic consumption amount (Morphine consumption) as evaluation parameters of the patients : Post op 1st, 6th, 12th and 24th hours). It is planned to measure the effectiveness of the blocks by measuring the pain score and patient satisfaction in the preoperative and postoperative periods, and by measuring the amount of morphine consumed (in mg). In addition, it will be checked whether there is a change in discharge times between the groups in all patients. If complications such as postoperative nausea, vomiting, allergies, nerve damage and bleeding develop, they will be recorded.

The required number of patients was determined by power analysis. In the calculation using the data of Emile et al., if 15% change is expected according to the 1st Hour VAS value of the TAP block \[7\]. Researchers plan a continuous study of response variables from matching study subject groups. Previous data show that the difference of matched pairs is normally distributed with a standard deviation of 1.3. If the true difference in the mean response of the matched pairs is 0.72, Researchers would need to study 28 subjects per group to reject the null hypothesis that this difference in response is zero with probability (power) 0.8. The probability of Type I error associated with this test of the 'null hypothesis' is 0.05. At least 84 patients for the three groups should be analyzed. Researchers plan to include 94 patients with a 10% probable dropout rate.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pain, Postoperative

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

After the patients are routinely put to sleep, TAP block will be applied to the 1st group, QLB block will be applied to the 2nd group, and no intervention will be performed to the 3rd group as it is the control group.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Control group

No intervention + Patient Control Analgesia (PCA)

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Control Group

Intervention Type OTHER

Control Group + Patient Control Analgesia (PCA)

QLB group

QLB group Block will be applied + Patient Control Analgesia (PCA)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

QLB block

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Quadratus lumborum block is a block of the posterior abdominal wall, "interfascial plane block," which is performed exclusively under ultrasound guidance. It was described as a variant of the TAP block.

TAP group

TAP Block group will be applied + Patient Control Analgesia (PCA)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

TAP block

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block was introduced as a landmark-guided technique via the triangle of Petit to achieve a field block. It involves the injection of a local anesthetic solution into a plane between the internal oblique muscle and transversus abdominis muscle.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

TAP block

The transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block was introduced as a landmark-guided technique via the triangle of Petit to achieve a field block. It involves the injection of a local anesthetic solution into a plane between the internal oblique muscle and transversus abdominis muscle.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

QLB block

Quadratus lumborum block is a block of the posterior abdominal wall, "interfascial plane block," which is performed exclusively under ultrasound guidance. It was described as a variant of the TAP block.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Control Group

Control Group + Patient Control Analgesia (PCA)

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) Quadratus lumborum block (QLB)

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* BMI\> 35 kg/m2
* Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy operation
* ASA I-III
* General anesthesia will be applied and patients who agree to participate in the study will be included.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients younger than 18 years of age
* Bleeding disorders (INR: 1.2, antithrombotic, antiaggregant drug use, hematological disorders, etc.) That are contraindications for regional anesthesia, and those with infection at the planned skin site
* Psychiatric or neurological disorders, and substance addictions
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Biruni University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Assistant Prof. Dr. Suna Koc MD

Assistant professor Dr

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Mehmet I Buget, Assoc Prof

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Biruni Universty

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Suna Koç

Istanbul, Besyol, Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Suna Koç

Istanbul, Kucukcekmece, Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

1. Sarandan M, Balasa CG, Papurica M et al (2011) Anesthesia in laparoscopic bariatric surgery (gastric sleeve) preliminary experience. TMJ 61:1-2

Reference Type RESULT

2. Melzack R, Katz J (1994) Pain measurements in persons in pain. In Wall PD, Melzack R (Eds) Textbook of pain. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, pp 409-426

Reference Type RESULT

Macintyre PE, Loadsman JA, Scott DA. Opioids, ventilation and acute pain management. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2011 Jul;39(4):545-58. doi: 10.1177/0310057X1103900405.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 21823370 (View on PubMed)

Sinclair DR, Chung F, Mezei G. Can postoperative nausea and vomiting be predicted? Anesthesiology. 1999 Jul;91(1):109-18. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199907000-00018.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 10422935 (View on PubMed)

Niraj G, Searle A, Mathews M, Misra V, Baban M, Kiani S, Wong M. Analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block in patients undergoing open appendicectomy. Br J Anaesth. 2009 Oct;103(4):601-5. doi: 10.1093/bja/aep175. Epub 2009 Jun 26.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 19561014 (View on PubMed)

6. Bisgaard T (2006) Laparoskopik kolesistektomi sonrası analjezik tedavisi. Anesteziyoloji 104:835-846

Reference Type RESULT

Emile SH, Abdel-Razik MA, Elbahrawy K, Elshobaky A, Shalaby M, Elbaz SA, Gado WA, Elbanna HG. Impact of Ultrasound-Guided Transversus Abdominis Plane Block on Postoperative Pain and Early Outcome After Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery: a Randomized Double-Blinded Controlled Trial. Obes Surg. 2019 May;29(5):1534-1541. doi: 10.1007/s11695-019-03720-y.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 30706309 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2015-KAEK-76-23-02

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.