Solid State vs. Balloon Esophageal Catheter for Estimation of Pleural Pressure

NCT ID: NCT05817968

Last Updated: 2024-05-02

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

16 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-10-20

Study Completion Date

2024-03-21

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Measurements of esophageal pressure (Pes) as surrogate for pleural pressure are routinely performed in selected ICU patients to facilitate lung-protective ventilation and assess breathing effort. Pes is clinically measured via a nasogastric esophageal catheter. Current techniques involve balloon catheters but have some important disadvantages as they could deflate over time and require a very precise positioning and filling volume. A solid-state sensor does not have disadvantages associated with balloon catheters and may therefore be a useful alternative in clinical practice.

This method-comparison study in adult mechanically ventilated ICU patients evaluates the accuracy of Pes measured using an esophageal catheter with a solid-state sensor as compared to a balloon catheter as reference standard.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Measurements of esophageal pressure (Pes) as surrogate for pleural pressure are routinely performed in selected ICU patients to facilitate lung-protective ventilation and assess breathing effort. Pes is clinically measured via a nasogastric esophageal catheter. Current techniques involve balloon catheters but have some important disadvantages as they could deflate over time and require a very precise positioning and filling volume. A solid state sensor does not have disadvantages associated with balloon catheters and may therefore be a useful alternative in clinical practice.

This method-comparison study in adult mechanically ventilated ICU patients evaluates the accuracy of Pes measured using an esophageal catheter with a solid-state sensor as compared to a balloon catheter as reference standard.

Subjects will receive a standard balloon esophageal catheter and a solid-state pressure catheter for simultaneous measurements of Pes. Study population will be post-surgical ICU patients. Measurements will be performed during clinical mechanical ventilation settings which include a first phase of passive controlled ventilation (patient is still sedated after surgery) as well a phase of partially-assisted ventilation where the patient's breathing effort has resumed and is assisted by the ventilator. During both phases, 10-15 minutes of tidal breathing will be recorded.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Respiratory Failure Mechanical Ventilation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Method comparison study; participants serve as their own control
Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Esophageal manometry using a solid state sensor vs. balloon catheter

Placement of both a solid state and balloon esophageal pressure (Pes) catheter. Pes recordings of these catheters will be acquired simultaneously during both controlled mechanical ventilation and assisted mechanical ventilation, for 10-15 minutes per phase. Ventilator settings/protocol will be as per standard-of-care.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

intelligent Esophageal Pressure Catheter (iEPC)

Intervention Type DEVICE

Placement of the iEPC nasogastric catheter with solid state sensor for esophageal manometry.

Comparator: Esophageal balloon catheter (NutriVent).

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

intelligent Esophageal Pressure Catheter (iEPC)

Placement of the iEPC nasogastric catheter with solid state sensor for esophageal manometry.

Comparator: Esophageal balloon catheter (NutriVent).

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Solid state esophageal pressure catheter, PulmoTech B.V.

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Signed informed consent
* Patient requiring mechanical ventilation at the ICU following cardiothoracic or abdominal surgery
* Age ≥ 18 year

Exclusion Criteria

* Pregnancy
* Upper airway/esophageal/mouth or face pathology (i.e. recent surgery, esophageal varices, diaphragmatic hernia)
* Nasal bleeding within the last \<2 weeks
* Presence of pneumothorax
* Use of anticoagulants that increase the risk of catheter insertion
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Pulmotech B.V.

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Erasmus Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Annemijn Jonkman

Assistant Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Annemijn Jonkman, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Erasmus Medical Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Erasmus MC

Rotterdam, South Holland, Netherlands

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Netherlands

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

van Oosten JP, Goedendorp N, Mousa A, Flink RC, Schaart R, Flinsenberg M, Somhorst P, Gommers DAMPJ, Heunks L, Jonkman AH. Solid-state esophageal pressure sensor for the estimation of pleural pressure: a bench and first-in-human validation study. Crit Care. 2025 Jan 27;29(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s13054-025-05279-w.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 39871347 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

MEC-2023-0119

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Lung EIT Image Guide Ventilation in ARDS
NCT07309783 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA