ENDOblock: Bilateral Superficial Cervical Blocks With Local Wound Infiltration in Thyroid Surgery

NCT ID: NCT05805423

Last Updated: 2025-03-27

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

74 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-04-17

Study Completion Date

2025-11-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is a single center, prospective, double-blinded randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy of bilateral superficial cervical plexus blocks (BSCPB) with local wound infiltration vs placebo with local wound infiltration in reducing thyroid surgery postoperative pain. Primary outcomes assessed are post operative pain, quality of life/recovery, post operative nausea/vomiting and opioid use.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The study consists of enrollment period until 74 participants acquired (37 will be in each arm), a treatment period (day of surgery), and a 2 week follow up period.

A web-based randomizer (https://randomizer.org/) will be used to randomly assign participants into Group A (bilateral superficial cervical plexus blocks + local wound infiltration) and Group B (placebo + local wound infiltration). Numbered envelopes with respective assignments and medications sealed within will be prepared by a research assistant separate from the surgical team and brought to the operating theater together with subjects. Participants and surgeons will both be blinded to the intervention.

Induction of anesthesia will occur prior to performing a block. All participants will be closely monitored by anesthesia, including BP, HR, SpO2, tidal volumes, peak pressures, CO2.

Participants who are randomized to the bilateral superficial cervical plexus blocks + local wound infiltration (Group A) will have 10mL of 0.25% Bupivacaine injected bilaterally (total 20mL) at Erb's point, which is located at the mid-point between the mastoid process and the posterior border of the clavicular head of the sternocleidomastoid muscle (SCM). The injection is just below the lateral border of the SCM, which produces surface level anesthesia of the neck, targeting superficial nerves of the cervical plexus (1). Injections will be aimed at just below the dermis. Then 10mL of 0.25% Bupivacaine will be injected at the planned neck incision (local wound infiltration). The participants randomized to the placebo+local wound infiltration group will have 10mL of 0.25% Bupivacaine injected at the planned neck incision, with 10mL of normal saline injected at bilateral Erb's point (total 20mL). All injections will be performed by the same team of two surgeons and with 22 gauge needles to standardize the technique. Surgery will be performed according to standard clinical care, also by the same group of surgeons, standardizing the surgical technique.

As is our standard practice following thyroid surgery, participants will be observed for at least 4 hours in the post anesthesia care unit for postoperative complications, adequate pain control, neck hematoma, and possible complications from the BSCPB. These rare complications can include CNS toxicity, partial brachial plexus palsy, Horner's syndrome, or recurrent laryngeal nerve block. All participants will be assessed at 3-5 hours after surgery to ensure their post operative pain is acceptable on oral medications and they do not have any of the above complications. They will either stay overnight or be discharged home with standardized discharge instructions and pain medication regimen, which will include taking Tylenol every 6 hours, alternated with ibuprofen. This pain regimen will be used for participants unless changed for clinical contraindications as determined by the attending surgeon. If participants request additional medication, they will be prescribed with a few pills of 5mg oxycodone, which they can take up to every 4 hours.

A primary outcome will be postoperative pain. Neck pain intensity will be quantified using the numeric rating scale (visual analog score 0-10, VAS) at 3-5 hours (in post anesthesia care unit), post operative day 2, via telephone call, and 2 weeks +/- 3 days postoperatively (at their follow up video visit). In addition, comparisons between groups will be made for 48-hour opioid usage by participants self-reporting at the post operative day 2 follow up phone call.

Another primary outcome is the 15-item quality of recovery questionnaire score at post operative day 2 and two weeks postoperative.

Incidence of nausea, vomiting, dysphagia or hoarseness in the first 2 days after surgery will also be measured (roughly the first 48 hours after surgery).

The planned data analysis for quality of recovery scores will be done using independent t test, with 95% confidence interval and two-tailed p values reported. Significance levels will be set at p=0.05. The investigators plan to analyze pain scores across the 3 periods with linear regression, with output the difference between the groups across all periods (95% CI and p=0.05) and the difference between the groups in each period (95% CI and p=0.05). The 48-hour opioid usage will be likely analyzed by using independent t test with 95% confidence intervals and two-tailed p values reported (p=0.05). Nausea, vomiting, hoarseness, dysphagia will be recorded as categorical variables and the investigators plan to analyze them using the Pearson chi-squared test.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Post Operative Pain Nausea and Vomiting, Postoperative Opioid Use

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

single center, prospective, double-blinded randomized controlled trial
Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Bilateral superficial cervical plexus blocks + local wound infiltration

the bilateral superficial cervical plexus block will be performed with 10mL of 0.25% Bupivacaine injected bilaterally (total 20mL) at Erb's point in the lateral neck, which is located at the mid-point between the mastoid process and the posterior border of the clavicular head of the sternocleidomastoid muscle. The injection is just below the lateral border of the sternocleidomastoid muscle, which produces surface level anesthesia of the neck, targeting superficial nerves of the cervical plexus. Then 10mL of 0.25% Bupivacaine will be injected at the planned neck incision (local wound infiltration) on the anterior neck. These will be done intra-operative and only once

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

bilateral superficial cervical plexus blocks and local wound infiltration

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

10mL bupivacaine at Erb's point bilaterally and 10mL 0.25% Bupicacaine at incision

placebo + local wound infiltration

10mL of 0.25% bupivacaine injected at the planned neck incision (local wound infiltration), with 10mL of normal saline injected at bilateral Erb's point (total 20mL) (placebo at site of BSCPB). These will be done intra-operative and only once.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

placebo injection and local wound infiltration

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

10mL normal saline at Erb's point bilaterally and 10mL 0.25% Bupicacaine at incision

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

bilateral superficial cervical plexus blocks and local wound infiltration

10mL bupivacaine at Erb's point bilaterally and 10mL 0.25% Bupicacaine at incision

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

placebo injection and local wound infiltration

10mL normal saline at Erb's point bilaterally and 10mL 0.25% Bupicacaine at incision

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* undergoing thyroid surgery, either hemi- or total thyroidectomy
* over 18 years-old and
* able to consent for themselves

Exclusion Criteria

* have had previous neck surgery
* have coagulation disorders
* on anticoagulants
* are pregnant
* allergic to bupivacaine
* anyone with chronic pain conditions
* has received steroid injections or used opioids/pain medications in the two weeks leading up to surgery
* have a substernal goiters
* undergoing lateral neck lymph node dissection
* unable to take NSAIDs
* kidney dysfunction (defined as GFR \<60) within 90 days of surgery, prohibiting the use of NSAIDs
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

99 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of California, Davis

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

UC Davis Medical Center

Sacramento, California, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Alexis L Woods, MD

Role: CONTACT

2794657077

Claire E Graves, MD

Role: CONTACT

9167345907

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Alexis L Woods, MD

Role: primary

279-465-7077

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Kim JS, Ko JS, Bang S, Kim H, Lee SY. Cervical plexus block. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2018 Aug;71(4):274-288. doi: 10.4097/kja.d.18.00143. Epub 2018 Jul 4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29969890 (View on PubMed)

Mayhew D, Sahgal N, Khirwadkar R, Hunter JM, Banerjee A. Analgesic efficacy of bilateral superficial cervical plexus block for thyroid surgery: meta-analysis and systematic review. Br J Anaesth. 2018 Feb;120(2):241-251. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2017.11.083. Epub 2017 Dec 5.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29406173 (View on PubMed)

Dieudonne N, Gomola A, Bonnichon P, Ozier YM. Prevention of postoperative pain after thyroid surgery: a double-blind randomized study of bilateral superficial cervical plexus blocks. Anesth Analg. 2001 Jun;92(6):1538-42. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200106000-00038.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11375842 (View on PubMed)

Karthikeyan VS, Sistla SC, Badhe AS, Mahalakshmy T, Rajkumar N, Ali SM, Gopalakrishnan S. Randomized controlled trial on the efficacy of bilateral superficial cervical plexus block in thyroidectomy. Pain Pract. 2013 Sep;13(7):539-46. doi: 10.1111/papr.12022. Epub 2012 Dec 19.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23279371 (View on PubMed)

Cai HD, Lin CZ, Yu CX, Lin XZ. Bilateral superficial cervical plexus block reduces postoperative nausea and vomiting and early postoperative pain after thyroidectomy. J Int Med Res. 2012;40(4):1390-8. doi: 10.1177/147323001204000417.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22971490 (View on PubMed)

Eti Z, Irmak P, Gulluoglu BM, Manukyan MN, Gogus FY. Does bilateral superficial cervical plexus block decrease analgesic requirement after thyroid surgery? Anesth Analg. 2006 Apr;102(4):1174-6. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000202383.51830.c4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16551919 (View on PubMed)

Myles PS, Shulman MA, Reilly J, Kasza J, Romero L. Measurement of quality of recovery after surgery using the 15-item quality of recovery scale: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth. 2022 Jun;128(6):1029-1039. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2022.03.009. Epub 2022 Apr 14.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 35430086 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

1958184

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.