Vitamin K Antagonist Versus Direct Oral Anticoagulant Treatments in Hemophilia
NCT ID: NCT05804734
Last Updated: 2023-04-07
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
54 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2021-06-01
2021-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Healthcare professionals are so more confronted to PWH with age-related pathologies, in particular cardiovascular pathologies such as atrial fibrillation, acute coronary syndromes or thromboembolic events (arterial or venous). It is now recommended in PWH that an anticoagulant treatment (AC) be prescribed as in the general population (2,3,4). The recently published COCHE study demonstrated a significantly increased risk of bleeding in PWH receiving antithrombotic treatment. This bleeding risk depended significantly on the type of antithrombotic treatment, which was higher for anticoagulant vs antiplatelet drugs, on basal levels of FVIII or FIX, and on the HAS-BLED score (5).
Nowadays in the general population, among anticoagulant drugs, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are preferred to vitamin K antagonist (KVA), thanks to their reduced risk of bleeding particularly intracerebral bleeding and better anticoagulant stability over time (6). However, we do not yet know precisely whether DOACs could occupy the same place in the PWH population because of the lack of evidence-based data due to the very small number of these patients, although some authors already recommend them over KVA. The KADOAH study was therefore set up to try to provide initial elements for future recommendations. Its main objective was to compare the level of bleeding risk of PWH treated with VKA vs DOACs.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Genetic Influence of Genetic Factors Influencing the Desmopressin's Efficacy in Mild/Moderate Hemophilia A
NCT05628558
Safety and Efficacy of BAY94-9027 in Previously Treated Male Children With Haemophilia A
NCT01775618
Personalized Prophylactic Treatment With Advate® in Severe or Moderate Haemophilia A Patients
NCT02622646
Evaluation of the Reasons and Consequences of Bleeding in Late Teens and Early Adulthood Patients With Severe Hemophilia A
NCT00782470
Efficacy and Safety of KN057 Prophylaxis in Patients With Haemophilia A or B With Inhibitors
NCT06312475
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Objectives of the KADOAH study are:
* To compare the risk of bleeding events of 2 types of long-term anticoagulant treatment, vitamin K antagonists (VKA) versus Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOAC), in patients with hemophilia,
* To describe the different types of bleeding events that occur during anticoagulant treatments in patients with hemophilia,
* To investigate for the influence of the HAS-BLED score on the risk of bleeding events in patients with hemophilia receiving a long-term anticoagulant treatment.
Inclusion criteria:
* Cases :
* Males at any ages with hemophilia of any severity and of any type,
* Patients having received or receiving a long-term anticoagulant treatment (during at least 6 consecutive months) during the period from 2012 to 2021,
* Regular follow-up in a hemophilia treatment center.
* Controls cross-matched with cases on :
* Age (+/- 5 years),
* Hemophilia type (either A or B)
* Hemophilia severity (for mild hemophilia: same basal factor level +/- 5%),
* HAS-BLED score (same score +/- 1).
Exclusion criteria:
* Lost to medical follow-up,
* Refusal to participate in the study,
* Unable to understand the study's French letter of non-opposition and information.
Collected data:
All data collected in this study were issued from the medical files at the moment of the inclusion in the study. They include:
* The age,
* The hemophilia's type,
* The hemophilia's severity and last basal factor VIII or IX level,
* The treatment with anticoagulant drug for cases including :
* Type of drug (either VKA or DOAC)
* Duration of treatments
* Treatments dosages,
* Compliance of treatments,
* Indications,
* If stopped prematurely, reasons for stopping.
* The occurrence of severe bleeding events (SBE) following the ISTH definition (7):
* The number of SBE per patient,
* The types of SBE,
* The treatment of SBE.
* The HAS-BLED score calculated with the presence or absence of the following items:
* High arterial pressure,
* Abnormal renal and/or liver functions,
* Hemorrhagic stroke,
* Bleeding antecedent,
* Age \>65 years,
* Treatments altering the hemostasis (out of the anticoagulants) and/or alcohol intoxication.
* The CHA2DS-VASc score calculated with the presence or absence of the following items:
* Cardiac insufficiency/left ventricular dysfunction,
* High arterial pressure,
* Age ≥ 75 years, or age = 65 - 74 years,
* Diabetes,
* History of thrombotic events (transient ischemic cerebral attack or stroke, venous thromboembolic events)
* Associated treatment with a proton pomp inhibitor or other gastric protector,
Statistical analyses Descriptive characteristics were analyzed with median values, their 25-75% interquartile ranges (IQR) and minimum-maximum values (MIN-MAX), or mean values with standard deviation (SD). The Fisher's exact test will be performed to compare proportions in contingency tables and the t Student test to compare continuous variables. An approximate 95% confidence interval will be determined (95% CI) for every statistical analysis and a p-value \<0.05 will be considered statistically significant. The GraphPad v7.0 (Prism Software Inc. San Diego CA) will be used to perform the statistical analyses.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_CONTROL
RETROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Cases
Patients with hemophilia receiving an anticoagulant treatment in the period 2012-2021
Vitamin K Antagonist - Drug
Only clinical data (number and types of severe bleeding events, HAS-BLED score, CHA2DS2-VASc score) are collected during the follow-up:
* For cases when they received an anticoagulant treatment and during the 12 months preceding this treatment,
* For controls during the same periods of their cross-matched cases when reciving anticoagulant treatment.
Controls
Patients with hemophilia cross-matched with cases on the age, the hemophilia's severity, the hemophilia's type, and the HAS-BLED score.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Vitamin K Antagonist - Drug
Only clinical data (number and types of severe bleeding events, HAS-BLED score, CHA2DS2-VASc score) are collected during the follow-up:
* For cases when they received an anticoagulant treatment and during the 12 months preceding this treatment,
* For controls during the same periods of their cross-matched cases when reciving anticoagulant treatment.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Males at any ages with hemophilia of any severity and of any type,
* Patients having received or receiving a long-term anticoagulant treatment (during at least 6 consecutive months) during the period from 2012 to 2021,
* Regular follow-up in a hemophilia treatment center.
* Controls : patients with hemophilia cross-matched with cases on:
* Age (+/- 5 years),
* Hemophilia type (either A or B)
* Hemophilia severity (for mild hemophilia: same basal factor level +/- 5%),
* HAS-BLED score (same score +/- 1).
Exclusion Criteria
* Refusal to participate in the study,
* Unable to understand the study's French letter of non-opposition and information.
18 Years
85 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Groupe Maladies hémorragiques de Bretagne
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Benoît GUILLET, MD PhD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
University hospital of rennes, France
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hemophilia treatment center of Brest
Brest, , France
Hemophilia treatment center of caen
Caen, , France
Hemophilia treatment center of Le Mans
Le Mans, , France
Hemophilia treatment center of Nantes
Nantes, , France
Hemophilia treatment center of Rennes
Rennes, , France
Hemophilia treatment center of Rouen
Rouen, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Andrade JG, Verma A, Mitchell LB, Parkash R, Leblanc K, Atzema C, Healey JS, Bell A, Cairns J, Connolly S, Cox J, Dorian P, Gladstone D, McMurtry MS, Nair GM, Pilote L, Sarrazin JF, Sharma M, Skanes A, Talajic M, Tsang T, Verma S, Wyse DG, Nattel S, Macle L; CCS Atrial Fibrillation Guidelines Committee. 2018 Focused Update of the Canadian Cardiovascular Society Guidelines for the Management of Atrial Fibrillation. Can J Cardiol. 2018 Nov;34(11):1371-1392. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2018.08.026.
Ferraris VA, Boral LI, Cohen AJ, Smyth SS, White GC 2nd. Consensus review of the treatment of cardiovascular disease in people with hemophilia A and B. Cardiol Rev. 2015 Mar-Apr;23(2):53-68. doi: 10.1097/CRD.0000000000000045.
Schutgens RE, van der Heijden JF, Mauser-Bunschoten EP, Mannucci PM. New concepts for anticoagulant therapy in persons with hemophilia. Blood. 2016 Nov 17;128(20):2471-2474. doi: 10.1182/blood-2016-07-727032. Epub 2016 Sep 26. No abstract available.
Schulman S, Kearon C; Subcommittee on Control of Anticoagulation of the Scientific and Standardization Committee of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis. Definition of major bleeding in clinical investigations of antihemostatic medicinal products in non-surgical patients. J Thromb Haemost. 2005 Apr;3(4):692-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2005.01204.x.
Darby SC, Kan SW, Spooner RJ, Giangrande PL, Hill FG, Hay CR, Lee CA, Ludlam CA, Williams M. Mortality rates, life expectancy, and causes of death in people with hemophilia A or B in the United Kingdom who were not infected with HIV. Blood. 2007 Aug 1;110(3):815-25. doi: 10.1182/blood-2006-10-050435. Epub 2007 Apr 19.
Guillet B, Cayla G, Lebreton A, Trillot N, Wibaut B, Falaise C, Castet S, Gautier P, Claeyssens S, Schved JF. Long-Term Antithrombotic Treatments Prescribed for Cardiovascular Diseases in Patients with Hemophilia: Results from the French Registry. Thromb Haemost. 2021 Mar;121(3):287-296. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1718410. Epub 2020 Oct 24.
Gomez-Outes A, Terleira-Fernandez AI, Calvo-Rojas G, Suarez-Gea ML, Vargas-Castrillon E. Dabigatran, Rivaroxaban, or Apixaban versus Warfarin in Patients with Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Subgroups. Thrombosis. 2013;2013:640723. doi: 10.1155/2013/640723. Epub 2013 Dec 22.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2023_VKA-DOA_01
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.