Effect of Cognitive Stimulating Interventions on Cognitive Self-Efficacy and Sense of Happiness Among Older Adults

NCT ID: NCT05802043

Last Updated: 2023-04-06

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

80 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-01-17

Study Completion Date

2023-02-10

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The present study aims to determine the effect of cognitive stimulation interventions on cognitive self-efficacy and sense of happiness among older adults.

Research hypothesis:

Older adults who receive the cognitive stimulation interventions exhibit higher cognitive self-efficacy and sense of happiness than those who do not receive it.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

A convenient sample of eighty (80) older adults will be used according Epi info V 7.0 program calculation based on the following statistical parameters ; Population size: 250, expected frequency: 50%, confidence coefficient: 95%, acceptable error: 10%, minimum sample size = 70.

The study will include eighty (80) older adults aged 60 years and more and fulfilling the following criteria:

Inclusion criteria

1. Aged 60 years and old.
2. Able to read and write.
3. Have mild cognitive impairment: score of score of 18-23 based on the Mini Mental State Examination Scale (MMSE).
4. Have no depression: score of 0 to 4 using the Geriatric Depression Scale Short Form (GDS\_SF).
5. Accept participation in the study. 6. Available at the selected setting during the time of data collection. 7. Have no pronounced impairment of their visual and auditory abilities could affect their participation in the group and make use of most of the materials in the sessions, as determined by the researchers.

The selected study subjects (80) will be randomly assigned to two equal groups of 40 older adults each as flows; Group 1, study group: include older adults who will receive the proposed interventions, cognitive stimulation interventions.

Group 2, control group: include older adults who will receive the routine activities of the elderly club.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Self- Efficacy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Cognitive Stimulating Interventions

The study interventions will be developed by the researchers based on review of the related literature and with reference to the CST manual (Spector, et al., 2006), and review on Cognitive Stimulation (Woods et al., 2012). The study subjects of group 1, the study group, will receive the proposed interventions, the cognitive stimulation interventions through small groups of study subjects receiving 12 sessions of group activities (2 sessions/week, approximately 45- 60 minutes/session). A group size of 6 to 8 will be conducted. The interventions group will be conducted in activity rooms within the elderl club. The study subjects group 2, the control group, will receive the routine activities of the elderly club. The researchers will provide the control group with written materials related the essential cognitive stimulation interventions after ending the implementation of the proposed interventions for the study group.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Cognitive Stimulating Interventions

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

a quasi-experimental research design.The study subjects of group 1, the study group, will receive the proposed interventions, the cognitive stimulation interventions through small groups of study subjects receiving 12 sessions of group activities (2 sessions/week, approximately 45- 60 minutes/session). A group size of 6 to 8 will be conducted. The interventions group will be conducted in activity rooms within the elderly club.

Routine Club care

The study subjects group 2, the control group, will receive the routine activities of the elderly club.The researchers will provide the control group with written materials related the essential cognitive stimulation interventions after ending the implementation of the proposed interventions for the study group,

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Cognitive Stimulating Interventions

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

a quasi-experimental research design.The study subjects of group 1, the study group, will receive the proposed interventions, the cognitive stimulation interventions through small groups of study subjects receiving 12 sessions of group activities (2 sessions/week, approximately 45- 60 minutes/session). A group size of 6 to 8 will be conducted. The interventions group will be conducted in activity rooms within the elderly club.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Cognitive Stimulating Interventions

a quasi-experimental research design.The study subjects of group 1, the study group, will receive the proposed interventions, the cognitive stimulation interventions through small groups of study subjects receiving 12 sessions of group activities (2 sessions/week, approximately 45- 60 minutes/session). A group size of 6 to 8 will be conducted. The interventions group will be conducted in activity rooms within the elderly club.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

4\. Have no depression: score of 0 to 4 using the Geriatric Depression Scale Short Form (GDS\_SF).

5\. Accept participation in the study. 6. Available at the selected setting during the time of data collection.

Exclusion Criteria

* 7\. Have pronounced impairment of their visual and auditory abilities could affect their participation in the group and make use of most of the materials in the sessions, as determined by the researchers.
Minimum Eligible Age

60 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Alexandria University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Eman Taha, professor

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Egypt Faculty of Nursing Alexandria, Egypt

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Faculty of Nursing

Alexandria, , Egypt

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Apostolo J, Bobrowicz-Campos E, Holland C, Cano A. One small step in frailty research, a giant leap in evidence based practice. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2018 Jan;16(1):1-3. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2017-003672. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29324548 (View on PubMed)

Coen RF, Flynn B, Rigney E, O'Connor E, Fitzgerald L, Murray C, Dunleavy C, McDonald M, Delaney D, Merriman N, Edgeworth J. Efficacy of a cognitive stimulation therapy programme for people with dementia. Ir J Psychol Med. 2011 Sep;28(3):145-147. doi: 10.1017/S0790966700012131.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30200025 (View on PubMed)

Feng L, Zin Nyunt MS, Gao Q, Feng L, Yap KB, Ng TP. Cognitive Frailty and Adverse Health Outcomes: Findings From the Singapore Longitudinal Ageing Studies (SLAS). J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2017 Mar 1;18(3):252-258. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2016.09.015. Epub 2016 Nov 9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27838339 (View on PubMed)

Kelly ME, Finan S, Lawless M, Scully N, Fitzpatrick J, Quigley M, Tyrrell F, O'Regan A, Devane A. An evaluation of community-based cognitive stimulation therapy: a pilot study with an Irish population of people with dementia. Ir J Psychol Med. 2017 Sep;34(3):157-167. doi: 10.1017/ipm.2016.23.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30115146 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

15012023

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Cognitive Stimulation Study
NCT02067689 COMPLETED NA