Pivotal Evaluation of Abdominal Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation (VentFree) for Weaning From Mechanical Ventilation

NCT ID: NCT05759013

Last Updated: 2025-11-12

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

272 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-02-15

Study Completion Date

2026-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of the VentFree Respiratory Muscle Stimulator (VentFree) in critically ill adult patients who require invasive mechanical ventilation, when compared to sham.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Approximately 40% of patients who receive invasive ventilation require more than four days of ventilator support. Every additional day of mechanical ventilation results in increased patient morbidity and mortality and increased economic cost. Mechanically ventilated patients often develop expiratory muscle weakness, which has been linked to failed extubation and weaning.

Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) uses electrical pulses to induce a muscle contraction and has been shown to reduce or retard muscle atrophy. NMES applied to the abdominal wall muscles has been shown to improve respiratory function and assist ventilator weaning in spinal cord injury. Liberate Medical has previously shown that NMES applied to the abdominal wall muscles in synchrony with exhalation is feasible in patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation. This study is a pivotal evaluation of the efficacy of exhalation synchronized abdominal NMES to assist ventilator weaning in critically ill patients.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Respiration, Artificial Ventilators, Mechanical

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Respiratory Muscle Stimulation Mechanical Ventilation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

VentFree Respiratory Muscle Stimulator

In the VentFree treatment group, abdominal functional electrical stimulation (FES) will be applied with a frequency of 30 hertz (Hz) and a pulse width of 350µs to cause a strong visible or palpable muscle contraction. The stimulation amplitude will be set to 90% of the participant's maximum tolerable level Discomfort associated with the maximum tolerable level will be recorded on the VAS with pain ratings from zero (no pain) to ten (worst pain). In uncommunicative patients, the maximum tolerable level will be determined as the stimulation intensity that results in a BPS \>4 or CPOT \>2. The stimulation amplitude will be titrated for each participant and each stimulation session. The stimulation amplitude will be evaluated every 10 (± 2) minutes after the start of each stimulation session and adjusted as necessary to maintain a consistent level of visual contraction and to ensure that the stimulation intensity remains within the participant's maximum tolerable level.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Breath synchronized abdominal FES

Intervention Type DEVICE

Active abdominal stimulation will be applied for 30 minutes twice per day (minimum of four hours between stimulation sessions), for a minimum of five days per week, for 28 days or ICU discharge, whichever comes first.

Sham Respiratory Muscle Stimulator

In the sham group, abdominal functional electrical stimulation (FES) will be set to cause sensory stimulation but no muscle contraction. Abdominal FES will be applied with a frequency of 30 hertz (Hz), a pulse width of 350 µs and a stimulation amplitude that does not cause abdominal wall muscle contraction. The stimulation amplitude will initially be set at 10 mA and reduced in steps of 2 milliamp (mA) until no muscle contraction is seen.

Group Type SHAM_COMPARATOR

Sham breath synchronized abdominal FES

Intervention Type DEVICE

Sham abdominal stimulation will be applied for 30 minutes twice per day (minimum of four hours between stimulation sessions), for a minimum of five days per week, for 28 days or ICU discharge, whichever comes first.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Breath synchronized abdominal FES

Active abdominal stimulation will be applied for 30 minutes twice per day (minimum of four hours between stimulation sessions), for a minimum of five days per week, for 28 days or ICU discharge, whichever comes first.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Sham breath synchronized abdominal FES

Sham abdominal stimulation will be applied for 30 minutes twice per day (minimum of four hours between stimulation sessions), for a minimum of five days per week, for 28 days or ICU discharge, whichever comes first.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

VentFree Respiratory Muscle Stimulator

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Participant is ≥ 22 years of age.
2. Participant has been receiving invasive mechanical ventilation for ≥ 24 hours.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Participant has been receiving invasive mechanical ventilation for \> 96 hours.
2. Participant is scheduled or expected to be disconnected from mechanical ventilation ≤ 24 hours after enrollment.
3. Participant was intubated for ≥ 24 hours during a prior episode of invasive mechanical ventilation during current hospitalization.
4. Participant has a BMI ≥ 40 Kg/m2.
5. Participant has no contraction of the abdominal wall muscles in response to abdominal FES as determined by ultrasound.
6. Participant has a pre-existing neuromuscular or muscular disorder that could affect the respiratory muscles (e.g., spinal cord injury or Guillain-Barré syndrome).
7. Participant has had open abdominal surgery ≤ 4 weeks prior to enrollment.
8. Participant has open or damaged skin at area of electrode placements.
9. Participant has a pacemaker and/or implanted electronic device.
10. Participant is known or expected to be pregnant. NOTE: A negative urine or blood pregnancy test will be documented during screening for women of child-bearing potential.
11. Participant is actively pharmacologically paralyzed at the time of enrollment. NOTE: Participants receiving neuromuscular blockers may be enrolled after a ≥ 12-hour washout period.
12. Participant is tracheostomized at the time of enrollment.
13. Participant is on home non-invasive ventilation (except for CPAP or BiPAP for obstructive sleep apnea).
14. Participant is receiving or expected to receive comfort measures (palliative, hospice, comfort care, etc.) at the time of screening or enrollment.
15. Participant is participating in any of the following:

* A study with the same or similar primary endpoint
* A study investigating electrical stimulation or respiratory muscle therapy
* Any study in which the investigator determines may interfere with the results of this study
16. Participant is unable or unwilling to comply with protocol requirements, including assessments, tests, and follow-up visits.
17. Participant has any other medical condition which in the opinion of the Investigator will make participation medically unsafe or interfere with the study results.
18. Participant or legally authorized representative is unwilling to provide written informed consent.
19. Participant or legally authorized representative is unable to provide written informed consent.
Minimum Eligible Age

22 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

United States Department of Defense

FED

Sponsor Role collaborator

Liberate Medical

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Angus Mclachlan, PhD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Liberate Medical

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

MemorialCare Long Beach Medical Center

Long Beach, California, United States

Site Status

University of Florida College of Medicine - Jacksonville

Jacksonville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Edward Hines, Jr. VA Hospital

Hines, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Loyola University

Maywood, Illinois, United States

Site Status

University of Louisville

Louisville, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Tufts Medical Center

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Weill Cornell Medicine / New York Presbyterian Hospital

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

University of Cincinnati

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

University of Pittsburgh

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Vanderbilt University Medical Center

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

MD Anderson Cancer Center

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Baylor College of Medicine

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Houston Methodist Hospital

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Memorial Hermann

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Providence Regional Medical Center

Everett, Washington, United States

Site Status

Monash Medical Centre

Clayton, , Australia

Site Status

Nepean Hospital

Kingswood, , Australia

Site Status

St. George Hospital

Kogarah, , Australia

Site Status

Prince of Wales Hospital

Randwick, , Australia

Site Status

Royal North Shore Hospital

St Leonards, , Australia

Site Status

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire d'Angers

Angers, , France

Site Status

Hôpital Saint Joseph Saint Luc

Lyon, , France

Site Status

Pitié-Salpêtrière University Hospital

Paris, , France

Site Status

Jeroen Bosch Ziekenhuis (JBZ)

's-Hertogenbosch, , Netherlands

Site Status

Canisius Wilhelmina Ziekenhuis (CWZ)

Nijmegen, , Netherlands

Site Status

Radboud University Medical Center

Nijmegen, , Netherlands

Site Status

Erasmus Medical Center

Rotterdam, , Netherlands

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Australia France Netherlands

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CDMRP - PR21220

Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT

Identifier Source: secondary_id

LM-VF-P3

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id