Siting Central Venous Catheters Precisely While Performing the Access Procedure
NCT ID: NCT05751395
Last Updated: 2023-03-02
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
120 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2023-03-01
2024-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
One technique to verify CVC position is the ECG method. Nowadays, the ECG method is applied using the maximum P-wave amplitude (P-max).
The hypothesis is that a method believed to be precise in assessing CVC position can provide the same results for CVC tip positions regardless of their respective insertion sites.
Can the ECG method (at P-max) provide the same results for the position of CVC tips regardless of their insertion site?
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Optimization of EKG Method for Long Term Central Venous Catheter Tip Placement
NCT01763801
Central Venous Catheter Placement With Thoracic Ultrasound and Intracavity ECG Positioning
NCT07291869
Central Venous Pressure and Right Atrial Pressure Measurements in Supine, Semi-recumbent and Trendelenburg Position
NCT06705374
Comparison of Bedside Ultrasound With Chest X-ray for Confirmation of Central Venous Catheter Position
NCT02959203
Accuracy of CVC Depth Prediction in Internal Jugular Veins: The Difference Between The Andropoulos and ECG Methods
NCT04215250
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The University's Institutional Review Board (IRB) registered and approved the study protocol (1518-03/05). The requirement for written informed consent was waived by the IRB.
Central venous catheters (CVC) play an important role in the management of critically ill patients by allowing measurement of haemodynamic variables that cannot be measured accurately by non-invasive means and by allowing delivery of medications and nutritional support that cannot be given safely through peripheral venous catheters. Unfortunately, these catheters are not without potential for harm. The insertion procedure in particular carries the risk of serious mechanical complications, though ultrasound imaging may dramatically reduce this risk.
For the catheter to function properly, tip location is of utmost importance. Inserting the tip too far into the right atrium raises serious risks of arrhythmias or even pericardial tamponade. Inserting it too shallowly - in the innominate vein or the upper third of the superior vena cava - poses the risk of intimal damage and consequently venous thrombosis, fibrin sleeve formation, and persistent withdrawal occlusion. Even with correct initial positioning, these catheters are prone to tip migration. However, the risk of erosion and even perforation of the vein wall also should not, in the light of their intensity, be ignored.
The ECG method of siting CVC tips has undergone marked development over recent decades. At present, the ECG method with its new interpretation - CVC tip at the maximum P-wave amplitude (P-max) - is a stable and reliable bedside method for positioning CVC tips exactly at the transition of the right atrium (RA) and superior vena cava (SVC) in patients in sinus rhythm. This is the only method that directly enables the operator to assess the correct CVC position during insertion. This study investigates the hypothesis that a method believed to be a precise approach to assessing CVC position can provide the same results for the position of two CVC tips regardless of respective insertion sites.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Critically ill Patients in severe Multiple Organ Dysfunction
Critically ill Patients in severe Multiple Organ Dysfunction in need of a second Central Venous Catheter (CVC) for e.g. blood purification techniques
Central Venous Access
Critically ill patients in severe MODS need a CVC and in some cases also a second line for e-g- blood purification techniques.
All CVCs are positioned via the ECG method with the CVC tip placed at P-max. Within 24 h a chest radiograph is obtained for assessment of the CVCs, especially their tips.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Central Venous Access
Critically ill patients in severe MODS need a CVC and in some cases also a second line for e-g- blood purification techniques.
All CVCs are positioned via the ECG method with the CVC tip placed at P-max. Within 24 h a chest radiograph is obtained for assessment of the CVCs, especially their tips.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Deutsche Interdisziplinäre Vereinigung für Intensiv- und Notfallmedizin
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Wolfram Schummer, MD, PhD
Principle Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Wolfram Schummer, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Friedrich Schiller University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Helios-Spital
Überlingen, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany
University Clinic Leipzig
Leipzig, Saxony, Germany
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Sebastian Stehr, Professor
Role: backup
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Kremser J, Kleemann F, Reinhart K, Schummer W. Optimized method for correct left-sided central venous catheter placement under electrocardiographic guidance. Br J Anaesth. 2011 Oct;107(4):567-72. doi: 10.1093/bja/aer189. Epub 2011 Jun 22.
Wirsing M, Schummer C, Neumann R, Steenbeck J, Schmidt P, Schummer W. Is traditional reading of the bedside chest radiograph appropriate to detect intraatrial central venous catheter position? Chest. 2008 Sep;134(3):527-533. doi: 10.1378/chest.07-2687. Epub 2008 Jul 18.
Schummer W, Schummer C, Schelenz C, Schmidt P, Frober R, Huttemann E. [Modified ECG-guidance for optimal central venous catheter tip positioning. A transesophageal echocardiography controlled study]. Anaesthesist. 2005 Oct;54(10):983-90. doi: 10.1007/s00101-005-0886-2. German.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
U1111-1285-5359
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.