Accuracy of CVC Depth Prediction in Internal Jugular Veins: The Difference Between The Andropoulos and ECG Methods
NCT ID: NCT04215250
Last Updated: 2020-08-20
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
72 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-12-12
2020-06-12
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Contralateral Head Rotation on Internal Jugular Vein to Carotid Artery Distance and Overlap Ratio
NCT03741946
Siting Central Venous Catheters Precisely While Performing the Access Procedure
NCT05751395
Measurement of Intravascular Volume Using USG of IVC Diameter Compared to VPW Chest X-ray
NCT03535038
Estimation of Internal Jugular Vein Central Venous Pressure (CVP) by Ultrasound
NCT00904358
Central Venous Catheter Placement With Thoracic Ultrasound and Intracavity ECG Positioning
NCT07291869
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
SINGLE_GROUP
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Andropulous method
Andropulous method uses equations to determine the depth of CVC insertion.
For subject with \<100 cm in height:
Depth of CVC insertion (cm) = (height (cm)/ 10)-1
For subject with \>100 cm in height:
Depth of CVC insertion (cm) = (height (cm)/ 10)-2
andropulous method
Counts the CVC depth using specific equation
ECG method
change in p wave from ECG
ECG
Using ECG to monitor the insertion of the CVC
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
ECG
Using ECG to monitor the insertion of the CVC
andropulous method
Counts the CVC depth using specific equation
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* indicated for CVC insertion
* has no contraindication for right internal jugular vein CVC insertion
Exclusion Criteria
* has cardiac malformation history
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Indonesia University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Aida Rosita Tantri
Anesthesiologist Consultant
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Aida R Tantri
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Indonesia University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Cipto Mangunkusumo Cental National Hospital
Jakarta, DKI Jakarta, Indonesia
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Wang L, Liu ZS, Wang CA. Malposition of Central Venous Catheter: Presentation and Management. Chin Med J (Engl). 2016 Jan 20;129(2):227-34. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.173525. No abstract available.
Chaskar V, Karnik PP, Dave NM, Garasia M. Comparative Study of Three Methods for Depth of Central Venous Catheter Placement in Children: An Observational Pilot Study. Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim. 2018 Apr;46(2):116-120. doi: 10.5152/TJAR.2018.32748. Epub 2018 Apr 1.
Kwon HJ, Jeong YI, Jun IG, Moon YJ, Lee YM. Evaluation of a central venous catheter tip placement for superior vena cava-subclavian central venous catheterization using a premeasured length: A retrospective study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Jan;97(2):e9600. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000009600.
Sharma D, Singh VP, Malhotra MK, Gupta K. Optimum depth of central venous catheter - Comparision by pere's, landmark and endocavitory (atrial) ECG technique: A prospective study. Anesth Essays Res. 2013 May-Aug;7(2):216-20. doi: 10.4103/0259-1162.118966.
Na HS, Kim JT, Kim HS, Bahk JH, Kim CS, Kim SD. Practical anatomic landmarks for determining the insertion depth of central venous catheter in paediatric patients. Br J Anaesth. 2009 Jun;102(6):820-3. doi: 10.1093/bja/aep078. Epub 2009 Apr 19.
Kremser J, Kleemann F, Reinhart K, Schummer W. Optimized method for correct left-sided central venous catheter placement under electrocardiographic guidance. Br J Anaesth. 2011 Oct;107(4):567-72. doi: 10.1093/bja/aer189. Epub 2011 Jun 22.
Andropoulos DB, Bent ST, Skjonsby B, Stayer SA. The optimal length of insertion of central venous catheters for pediatric patients. Anesth Analg. 2001 Oct;93(4):883-6. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200110000-00016.
Struck MF, Schmidt T, Winkler BE, Reinhart K, Schummer W. Formulas for prediction of insertion depths of internal jugular vein catheters adjusted to body height categories. J Vasc Access. 2016 Mar-Apr;17(2):191-4. doi: 10.5301/jva.5000488. Epub 2015 Dec 7.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IndonesiaUAnes 042
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.