The Effect of Craniosacral Therapy as Additive Procedure.

NCT ID: NCT05722756

Last Updated: 2023-02-10

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

51 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-01-01

Study Completion Date

2019-11-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This observational, retrospective study has shown, that the addition of craniosacral therapy to the Vojta method has improved the effects of the therapy in 6 months follow-up period. The chance for improvement was 9.42 times higher in Vojta + craniosacral group compared to the group conducted only with Vojta method.

The study results suggest that the craniosacral procedure should be considered as an additive regimen to the Vojta method in the therapy of children with central coordination disorders (CCD) . More data is still needed to improve the rehabilitation process in this group of patients.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The aim of the retrospective, observational study was the comparison between the effectiveness of Vojta therapy used alone and its combination with craniosacral therapy after 6 months of the therapy.

Data for analysis was from one Rehabilitation Center and covered the observation period: January 1, 2014 - November 30, 2019. The data was analyzed for the purpose of the study between January 1, 2022 - July 1, 2022.

To assess the effectiveness of the mentioned rehabilitation models for the children with central coordination disorders (CCD), the neurological status of the patient, expressed as the number of abnormal reactions (Vojta tests), at the beginning (W0) and after 6 months (W6) of the therapy was recorded blindly, based on the individual's records (collected previously for the purpose of the other study). Children who had completed six months of therapy and had efficacy results documented in their medical records were divided into group A (children treated with Vojta therapy alone) and group B (children treated with Vojta therapy combined with craniosacral therapy). Information about: the age at which the children started therapy, the APGAR score at the first minute of their life, the week in which they were born, mode of delivery, sex, birth weight, mother's age at delivery and duration of breastfeeding, was also collected to compare the groups.

Finally data from 32 children in group A and 19 children in group B was analyzed.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Central Nervous System Diseases

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

group A

treated with Vojta therapy

No interventions assigned to this group

group B

treated with Vojta therapy combined with craniosacral therapy

craniosacral therapy

Intervention Type OTHER

subtle form of applied touch, type of osteopathy

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

craniosacral therapy

subtle form of applied touch, type of osteopathy

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* CCD (central coordination disorders) diagnosis based on the paediatrician's opinion with a decision that the child needs rehabilitation;
* a score of 8- 10 on the APGAR scale in the first minute of life;
* no major birth defects documented that can push the diagnosis into the diagnosis of genetic disorders;
* the age of the child at the time of the assessment of its eligibility for rehabilitation: 1-6 months (of life), calculated based on completed months of life;
* available information regarding an abnormal result of the Vojta test, defined as at least 6 abnormal reactions (marked as abnormal \[AN\], or delayed \[OP\] in the test report) with abnormal muscle tension, which indicates moderate to severe CCD;
* available information regarding the first medical examination (during the first visit (W0)), and a follow-up visit after 6 months (W6) on the determined date, maintaining the defined timeframe (5.5-6 months after W0).

Exclusion Criteria

* children who obtained a score of \< 8 points on the APGAR scale in the first minute of life;
* suspicion of any major (significant) birth defect, congenital defect syndrome (e.g. Down syndrome, Sotos syndrome) and/or indications for consultation at Genetics Clinic based on paediatric records;
* age \< 1 month or \> 6 months;
* \< 6 abnormal reactions during the Vojta test at the first eligibility visit, which indicates mild or very mild CCD.
Minimum Eligible Age

1 Month

Maximum Eligible Age

6 Months

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Wroclaw Medical University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

108/2019

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.