Lidocaine Patches in Elderly Patients With Traumatic Rib Fractures

NCT ID: NCT05714631

Last Updated: 2025-05-09

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

5 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-10-01

Study Completion Date

2024-08-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Many patients are prescribed lidocaine patches for rib fractures despite mixed evidence to their efficacy. The outcome of this trial offers significant benefit to patient care if it finds benefit of their use or if it does not. Reducing opioid use and increasing functional outcomes in geriatric patient suffering rib fractures can improve quality of life and ability to return to prior levels of function. Limiting the need for opioid prescriptions dispensed in the community, particularly to vulnerable geriatric individuals, is also a key aspect in curbing the opioid epidemic. However, even if no difference is found, it would support stopping the use of lidocaine patches in this population as a waste of money and resources. The novel approach of adding the 3rd arm to assess for placebo effect will also carry clinical value, as a placebo effect that reduces opioid use may in fact be enough to support continued use of the products given their overall low side effect risk profile compared to opioids and other pain control medications.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Many patients are prescribed lidocaine patches for rib fractures despite mixed evidence to their efficacy. The outcome of this trial offers significant benefit to patient care if it finds benefit of their use or if it does not. Reducing opioid use and increasing functional outcomes in geriatric patient suffering rib fractures can improve quality of life and ability to return to prior levels of function. Limiting the need for opioid prescriptions dispensed in the community, particularly to vulnerable geriatric individuals, is also a key aspect in curbing the opioid epidemic. However, even if no difference is found, it would support stopping the use of lidocaine patches in this population as a waste of money and resources. The novel approach of adding the 3rd arm to assess for placebo effect will also carry clinical value, as a placebo effect that reduces opioid use may in fact be enough to support continued use of the products given their overall low side effect risk profile compared to opioids and other pain control medications

AIM 1: Determine if a 3-armed placebo controlled randomized trial evaluating the efficacy of 4% lidocaine patches is feasible on a large scale with up to 500 enrolled patients across multiple institutions.

Objective 1: Evaluate the study design, randomization system, drug delivery and placebo creation processes to determine barriers to a larger multicenter study design.

AIM 2: Determine if the use of 4% lidocaine patches decreases the utilization of opioids in geriatric (Age ≥65) patient with rib fractures and minimal other injuries by 50% or more during the first 72 hours of hospitalization.

Objective 2: Determine an appropriate target opioid reduction rate and appropriate enrollment numbers for a future a larger scale trial. We suspect a 50% opioid reduction may be larger than would be expected for a single aspect of multimodal pain control treatment. While the study will be powered to identify this difference, it is more likely that a 20-40% reduction could be achieved and therefore help determine appropriate power calculations for a future trial.

AIM 3: Determine if there is a potential placebo effect of topical patch therapy.

Objective 3: Utilizing a 3rd arm increases the number of patients needed to enroll but will help clarify if there is a significant placebo effect from the application of a non-medicated patch over rib fractures. There may be clinical benefit from this placebo effect itself which would need to be accounted for clinical recommendations generated from this and future studies.

AIM 4: Include post discharge opioid usage in analysis to determine the prolonged pain needs of patients suffering rib fractures.

Objective 4: Assess the feasibility of incorporating opioid prescription data using the Wisconsin Prescription Drug Monitoring Program (WI PDMP)as part of a clinical trial as a measure of post discharge opioid use.

Approved study staff will be screening the trauma surgery patients list. Elderly patients (\>/=65) with traumatic rib fractures will be approached within 24 hours after admission. Approved study staff will explain the project and informed consent in its entirety. Patients will then be randomized to one of 3 arms: 4% Lidocaine Patches, Placebo, Standard of Care (no lidocaine patch). Randomization will take place using RedCap database. The patients will receive the study drug or placebo as recommended by the manufacturer as 12 hours on, 12 hours off regimen. The patch location will be selected by the patient and nurse based on site of maximal pain. The patient will receive 1 drug or placebo patch for 1-3 rib fractures, 2 patches if 4-6 rib fractures, and 3 patches (maximum dose) if \& or more fractures. The 4% Lidocaine patches will be obtained from the Froedtert Investigational Drug Office and dispensed with enough supply to last for 3 patch cycles in 5 days. The patches will then have kinesio tape (designed for topical application) applied over the patch to blind the patients to whether it is a study drug or placebo. For placebo, a double thickness similarly shaped piece of kinesio tape will be used. Based on drug efficacy, all patches can be prepared at the time of study enrollment and remain viable for use during the duration of the study. Patients in the standard of care arm will not receive a patch. All other pain medications will be prescribed at the discretion of treating providers based on standard of care (see section 52.1 Pain Management Protocol Lidocaine RCT). Approved study staff will be accessing patient's electronic medical record 5 days after enrollment; approved study staff will gather information regarding pain score (scored out of 10) and oral morphine equivalent (OME). Dr. Jacob Peschman is the director of outpatient services; he will be accessing patient's 30-day post discharge opioid use utilizing the Wisconsin Prescription Drug Monitoring Program (PDMP). Patients will be approached by approved study staff 30-days post discharge. Patients will be asked several questions regarding pain score and control.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Rib Fractures

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Standard of care group

Patients in the standard of care will not be receiving any lidocaine or placebo patches. The aim of this group is to control for the placebo effect

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Placebo group

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo Patch

Intervention Type OTHER

Transdermal placebo patch

Intervention group

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

4% Lidocaine Patch

Intervention Type DRUG

Transdermal patch

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Placebo Patch

Transdermal placebo patch

Intervention Type OTHER

4% Lidocaine Patch

Transdermal patch

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* age\>/= 65 years
* Patients with injuries meeting an AIS score \</=2
* Patients admitted to trauma service
* Patients able to consent

Exclusion Criteria

* Age \<65 years
* Unable to consent
* Chronic pain medication usage; defined as \>/= 3 weeks of \>/= 30 mg oral morphine equivalent
* History of allergic reaction to lidocaine or adhesive tape
* Prisoners
* Patient will be excluded if pain is worse in non-ribs location
* Patient will be excluded if he has injuries not meeting our criteria
Minimum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Medical College of Wisconsin

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Jacob Peschman, MD

Assistant professor of surgery

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Abdul Hafiz Al Tannir

Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

PRO44982

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Rib Fracture Cryoanalgesia
NCT06093776 UNKNOWN