Comparing the Efficacy of Conservative Treatment With Minimally Invasive Surgery in the Treatment of Rib Fractures

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

238 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-03-01

Study Completion Date

2024-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Open, randomized, parallel controlled prospective clinical study design was used in this study.Subjects were patients with 2-4 displaced non-flail rib fractures.Operation group (Group 1) : minimally invasive internal fixation operation group under spontaneous breathing anesthesia.In the operation group of minimally invasive internal fixation under autonomic respiratory anesthesia, the fracture was determined preoperatively by chest CT+ three-dimensional reconstruction of the ribs, and the optimal incision location was determined. The fracture was exposed through as many small incisions as possible, and fixed with titanium plate or clon-type plate. During the operation, the autonomic respiratory anesthesia and paraviral nerve block technology was adopted.In the conservative group (group 2), routine treatment measures such as analgesia and chest strap fixed were adopted.The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety, feasibility, and efficacy of minimally invasive and conservative treatment for rib fractures with different Numbers of displaced ends.

Related Clinical Trials

Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.

Surgical and Conservative Treatment in Isolated Minor Rib Fractures

NCT04104932

Rib Fractures

UNKNOWN

Prospective Study of Video-assisted Rib Planting in Chest Wall Stabilization

NCT05340517

Rib Fractures Rib Fracture Multiple

COMPLETED NA

A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study Comparing the Clinical Effects of Surgical and Non-surgical Treatment of Low Rib Fractures

NCT05758870

Rib Fracture Multiple

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Quality of Life in Patients With Traumatic Rib Fracture After Rib Fracture Surgery

NCT03487458

Rib Fractures

UNKNOWN NA

The Pain Control in Rib Fracture With Non-invasive Stabilization (RCT)

NCT05080686

Rib Fractures Pain Thorax; Fracture

UNKNOWN NA

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

An open, randomized, parallel controlled prospective clinical study design type was used in this study. Subjects were patients with two to four displaced non-flail chest fractures of the ribs. Operation group (Group 1) : minimally invasive internal fixation operation group under spontaneous breathing anesthesia. In the operation group of minimally invasive internal fixation under autonomic respiratory anesthesia, the fracture was determined preoperatively by chest CT+ three-dimensional reconstruction of the ribs, and the optimal incision location was determined. The fracture was exposed through as many small incisions as possible, and fixed with titanium plate or clon-type plate. During the operation, the autonomic respiratory anesthesia and paraviral nerve block technology was adopted. In the conservative group (group 2), routine treatment measures such as analgesia, hemostasis and chest band fixation were adopted. The effects of the two treatments on lung function, pain index, complications and QoL were evaluated. It provides theoretical basis for the treatment of rib fracture

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Chest Trauma Rib Fractures Surgery--Complications

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Unilateral thoracic trauma, fractured ends of rib fractures displaced 2-4 places
2. Displaced fracture（CT image shows double displacement of bone cortex） located in the 3rd to 10th rib
3. The number of broken ends of displaced fractures is greater than that of undisplaced fractures
4. The length of time from injury to hospitalization \<24 hours
5. Age range（18-70）
6. ASA grade I-II
7. BMI \< 30
8. Preoperative partial arterial oxygen pressure \>60mmHg, partial arterial carbon dioxide pressure \<50mmHg

Exclusion Criteria

1. Difficult airway
2. History of esophageal reflux
3. Myasthenia gravis
4. Abnormal coagulation system
5. History of gastrointestinal ulcer or bleeding
6. History of anaesthesia related drug allergy

A history of asthma or chronic obstructive emphysema

8\. Women during pregnancy

9\. Flail chest

10\. Combined with severe craniocerebral trauma and external abdominal injuries

11\. Recent use of clopidogrel, warfarin and aspirin seriously affects blood clotting

12\. Self-administered analgesics after injury

13.Massive hemopneumothorax requires emergency surgery

14\. Patients who cannot tolerate surgery

\-

Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No