Randomized Clinical Trial of Rib Fixation Versus Medical Analgesia in Uncomplicated Rib Fractures on Pain Control.
NCT ID: NCT04745520
Last Updated: 2025-01-20
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
NA
102 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-03-12
2024-09-16
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Previous studies have shown that an important factor for persistent pain and functional disability is the intensity of the initial pain. However, preliminary studies have shown promising results with surgical fixation of rib fractures: reduced need for analgesic drugs, reduced pain at 1 month, reduced complications and improved motor skills in patients over 65 years of age.
To date, the only clinical trials that exist focused on the fixation of complicated rib dislocations. While fixation of uncomplicated rib fractures is a common practice, no randomized studies have been conducted to evaluate its impact on pain and quality of life in the medium and long term.
In this context, the aim of our randomized study is to compare pain at 2 months between operated and non-operated patients with uncomplicated rib fractures.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Pain Control in Rib Fracture With Non-invasive Stabilization (RCT)
NCT05080686
Orthosis of Acute Traumatic Rib Fractures Via RibFx Belt for Pain Alleviation and Improved Pulmonary Function
NCT03846024
Intercostal Cryoneurolysis Following Traumatic Rib Fractures
NCT03917823
Clinical Study of the U-Plate Fracture Repair System to Treat Rib Fractures
NCT00556543
Lidocaine Patches in Elderly Patients With Traumatic Rib Fractures
NCT05714631
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Trial objectives. No previous studies have provided definitive evidence for recommending rib fixation over simple pain medication to control pain. Our hypothesis is that a surgical approach may have further benefits as compared to a conservative treatment. The primary objective of the study is to compare pain two months after injury between two groups: group 1) patients who are treated with surgery and analgesic treatment; and group 2) patients who are treated with analgesic treatment alone. The secondary objective is to perform a longitudinal analysis over one year of the following parameters: amount of pain medication, quality of life, anxiety and depression, pulmonary capacity, return to work, and adverse events. Financial aspects are also investigated.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Rib fixation (medical devices)
Surgery and pain medication. The pain of patients will be treated with rib fixation and pain medication.
Rib fixation
Rib fixation is performed by a senior surgeon. The patient is under general anesthesia. A thoracotomy focused on the fracture is performed to optimize access to the rib to be repaired. Video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) can be performed to better localize rib fractures. Significant muscle division is avoided. Removal of the periosteum is not required. The broken rib segments are approximated with forceps and the medical devices are used to fix the fracture. The medical devices are implemented according to the manufacturers' recommendations. The goal is to stabilize the chest wall. It is not useful to fix all fractures to stabilize the wall. A chest tube can be placed at the end of the operation.
Medical devices
The following medical devices can be used:
* MatrixRIB™, De Puy Synthes Companies, Zuchwill, Switzerland
* STRATOS™, MedXpert GmbH, Heitersheim, Germany
* NiTi Fixing PlatesTM, IAWAI, Yandzhou, China
Analgesia
Epidural analgesia is continuing for 24 to 72 hours post-randomization to maximize outcome benefits. Afterwards, paracetamol, NSAID and/or opioid treatment are used according to pain severity. In case of opioid use, morphine treatment is preferred. However, other opioid drugs or doses can be considered to better customize the treatment.
Pain medication (comparator treatment)
Pain medication only.
Analgesia
Epidural analgesia is continuing for 24 to 72 hours post-randomization to maximize outcome benefits. Afterwards, paracetamol, NSAID and/or opioid treatment are used according to pain severity. In case of opioid use, morphine treatment is preferred. However, other opioid drugs or doses can be considered to better customize the treatment.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Rib fixation
Rib fixation is performed by a senior surgeon. The patient is under general anesthesia. A thoracotomy focused on the fracture is performed to optimize access to the rib to be repaired. Video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) can be performed to better localize rib fractures. Significant muscle division is avoided. Removal of the periosteum is not required. The broken rib segments are approximated with forceps and the medical devices are used to fix the fracture. The medical devices are implemented according to the manufacturers' recommendations. The goal is to stabilize the chest wall. It is not useful to fix all fractures to stabilize the wall. A chest tube can be placed at the end of the operation.
Medical devices
The following medical devices can be used:
* MatrixRIB™, De Puy Synthes Companies, Zuchwill, Switzerland
* STRATOS™, MedXpert GmbH, Heitersheim, Germany
* NiTi Fixing PlatesTM, IAWAI, Yandzhou, China
Analgesia
Epidural analgesia is continuing for 24 to 72 hours post-randomization to maximize outcome benefits. Afterwards, paracetamol, NSAID and/or opioid treatment are used according to pain severity. In case of opioid use, morphine treatment is preferred. However, other opioid drugs or doses can be considered to better customize the treatment.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* At least 1 dislocated rib fracture
* Fractures accessible to surgery
* Thoracic trauma no more than two days prior to screening for inclusion
* Thoracic epidural analgesia
* Written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
* Respiratory distress syndrome according to the Berlin definition
* Presence of \>1.5 liter of blood drained from the pleural space
* Hemostasis disorder defined by any of the following criteria:
* Platelet count \< 70'000/mm3,
* International Normalized Ratio (INR) \> 1.2 (Prothrombin \< 70%)
* activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) ≥ 60 seconds
* drugs such as: P2Y12 antagonists (clopidogrel, prasugrel) and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonists (abciximab, tirofiban)
* Pathological rib fracture due to metastasis
* Hemodynamic instability: systolic blood pressure \< 100 mmHg and heart rate \> 100 beats per minute
* Neurologic disorder: Glasgow Coma Score \< 13 in the initial 24 hours, or intracerebral, epidural, subdural, or subarachnoid hemorrhages, or cerebral contusion
* Titanium allergy
* Known or suspected non-compliance to medical therapy due to drug or alcohol abuse
* Age \<18 years old
* Women who know they are pregnant or breast feeding
* Inability to follow the procedures of the study, e.g. due to language problems, psychological disorders, dementia, etc.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois
OTHER
Hôpital du Valais
OTHER
Benoît Bédat
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Benoît Bédat
Fellow
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Benoît Bédat, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University Hospital, Geneva
Frédéric Triponez, Prof.
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
University Hospital, Geneva
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Unit of Thoracic and Endocrine Surgery, University Hospitals of Geneva
Geneva, , Switzerland
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Kerr-Valentic MA, Arthur M, Mullins RJ, Pearson TE, Mayberry JC. Rib fracture pain and disability: can we do better? J Trauma. 2003 Jun;54(6):1058-63; discussion 1063-4. doi: 10.1097/01.TA.0000060262.76267.EF.
Fabricant L, Ham B, Mullins R, Mayberry J. Prolonged pain and disability are common after rib fractures. Am J Surg. 2013 May;205(5):511-5; discusssion 515-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2012.12.007.
Gordy S, Fabricant L, Ham B, Mullins R, Mayberry J. The contribution of rib fractures to chronic pain and disability. Am J Surg. 2014 May;207(5):659-62; discussion 662-3. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.12.012. Epub 2014 Jan 31.
Marasco S, Lee G, Summerhayes R, Fitzgerald M, Bailey M. Quality of life after major trauma with multiple rib fractures. Injury. 2015 Jan;46(1):61-5. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2014.06.014. Epub 2014 Jun 21.
Katz J, Jackson M, Kavanagh BP, Sandler AN. Acute pain after thoracic surgery predicts long-term post-thoracotomy pain. Clin J Pain. 1996 Mar;12(1):50-5. doi: 10.1097/00002508-199603000-00009.
de Moya M, Bramos T, Agarwal S, Fikry K, Janjua S, King DR, Alam HB, Velmahos GC, Burke P, Tobler W. Pain as an indication for rib fixation: a bi-institutional pilot study. J Trauma. 2011 Dec;71(6):1750-4. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31823c85e9.
Wu WM, Yang Y, Gao ZL, Zhao TC, He WW. Which is better to multiple rib fractures, surgical treatment or conservative treatment? Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015 May 15;8(5):7930-6. eCollection 2015.
Fitzgerald MT, Ashley DW, Abukhdeir H, Christie DB 3rd. Rib fracture fixation in the 65 years and older population: A paradigm shift in management strategy at a Level I trauma center. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017 Mar;82(3):524-527. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001330.
Peek J, Smeeing DPJ, Hietbrink F, Houwert RM, Marsman M, de Jong MB. Comparison of analgesic interventions for traumatic rib fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2019 Aug;45(4):597-622. doi: 10.1007/s00068-018-0918-7. Epub 2018 Feb 6.
Perentes JY, Christodoulou M, Abdelnour-Berchtold E, Karenovics W, Gayet-Ageron A, Gonzalez M, Krueger T, Triponez F, Terrier P, Bedat B. Effectiveness of rib fixation compared to pain medication alone on pain control in patients with uncomplicated rib fractures: study protocol of a pragmatic multicenter randomized controlled trial-the PAROS study (Pain After Rib OSteosynthesis). Trials. 2022 Sep 2;23(1):732. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06509-0.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2019-01688
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.