Speech Entrainment Treatment for People With Aphasia

NCT ID: NCT05687994

Last Updated: 2025-09-18

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

30 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-01-25

Study Completion Date

2025-05-29

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The objective of this research is to experimentally delineate the direct effect of speech entrainment practice on independent speech production and identify practice conditions that enhance treatment benefits. The primary outcome measure (Correct Information Units per minute) tallies informativeness and efficiency of independent speech in treated stories.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Speech entrainment refers to speaking in unison with a model speaker by imitating the model in real time. The objective of the study is to (1) experimentally establish the direct effect of speech entrainment practice on independent speech production post-treatment, and (2) identify conditions that enhance treatment benefits. These aims are addressed in a within-subject efficacy study, where 40 people with aphasia produce different stories with entrainment support. Speaking without entrainment is evaluated one day before and one day after speech entrainment practice. Different practice stories will be randomized within participants to three experimental conditions to assess the effect of treatment (trained vs. untrained), training schedule (massed vs. distributed presentation of stories), and entrainment modality (practice with auditory-only or audiovisual model). Correct information units per minute for each story will be tallied to evaluate the differences between conditions and the associations with patient characteristics. For consistency with prior research, number of different words per minute will serve as a secondary outcome. The proposed research addresses a clinical need by testing and optimizing a promising treatment technique for enhancing aphasia rehabilitation.

This proof-of-concept study is the first to evaluate the direct effect of speech entrainment practice on independent speech. Thus, the effect size for accurate power estimation is not known. The strategy for this study is to optimize experimental sensitivity by maximizing the number of observations per participants per condition within the constraints of feasibility. The results from this study will provide critical information for evaluating the effect size for a subsequent phase. Nevertheless, to estimate an optimal sample size, the investigators leveraged the data from our Pilot Study, which examines the speech entrainment effect on immediate performance rather than learning. With 13 participants, the investigators estimated 80% power to detect the effect of 0.8 (mean difference between groups divided by the pooled standard deviation) observed in our pilot study for speaking with audiovisual speech entrainment vs. independent speech (Aim 1). The calculation is based on a paired t-test with an alpha of .05 (two-tailed) and a correlation of 0.5 between groups. With 24 participants, there is 80% power to detect the observed effect of 0.6 for speaking with audiovisual speech entrainment vs. auditory-only speech entrainment (alpha is set to .05, two-tailed, correlation between groups is .57; Aim 2b). The investigators have substantially increased the sample size (N=40) with the consideration that learning effects (the focus of the present study) are expected to be smaller than performance effects (the focus of the Pilot Study).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Aphasia, Acquired

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Audiovisual Speech Entrainment Practice

Audiovisual Speech Entrainment includes repeated practice of speaking synchronously with a recorded model, which provides contextual, temporal, and audiovisual cues for speaking.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Audiovisual Speech Entrainment Practice

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Speech Entrainment Practice is an aphasia rehabilitation treatment based on imitation of recorded speech in real time. Treatment includes repeated practice of speaking along with a recorded model, which provides contextual, temporal, auditory, and visual cues for speaking

Auditory Speech Entrainment Practice

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Speech Entrainment Practice is an aphasia rehabilitation treatment based on imitation of recorded speech in real time. Treatment includes repeated practice of speaking along with a recorded model, which provides contextual, temporal, and auditory cues for speaking

Auditory Speech Entrainment Practice

Auditory Speech Entrainment includes repeated practice of speaking synchronously with a recorded model, which provides contextual, temporal, and auditory cues for speaking.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Audiovisual Speech Entrainment Practice

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Speech Entrainment Practice is an aphasia rehabilitation treatment based on imitation of recorded speech in real time. Treatment includes repeated practice of speaking along with a recorded model, which provides contextual, temporal, auditory, and visual cues for speaking

Auditory Speech Entrainment Practice

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Speech Entrainment Practice is an aphasia rehabilitation treatment based on imitation of recorded speech in real time. Treatment includes repeated practice of speaking along with a recorded model, which provides contextual, temporal, and auditory cues for speaking

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Audiovisual Speech Entrainment Practice

Speech Entrainment Practice is an aphasia rehabilitation treatment based on imitation of recorded speech in real time. Treatment includes repeated practice of speaking along with a recorded model, which provides contextual, temporal, auditory, and visual cues for speaking

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Auditory Speech Entrainment Practice

Speech Entrainment Practice is an aphasia rehabilitation treatment based on imitation of recorded speech in real time. Treatment includes repeated practice of speaking along with a recorded model, which provides contextual, temporal, and auditory cues for speaking

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Between 18-80 years at the time of enrollment
* English as native language
* greater than six months post onset
* Diagnosis of aphasia based on Western Aphasia Battery - Revised (WAB-R)
* Score of 7 or less on the Fluency subsection of the WAB-R
* Demonstrate having the willingness and stamina to participate in the multiple-session protocol, either by traveling to the MRRI testing site or being tested at home

Exclusion Criteria

* History of learning disabilities
* History of other comorbid neurological impairments
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

Albert Einstein Healthcare Network

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Marja-Liisa Mailend, PhD

Institute Scientist

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Marja-Liisa Mailend, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Albert Einstein Healthcare Network

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Moss Rehabilitation Research Institute

Elkins Park, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

R21DC018893

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

2020-386

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Web-Based Treatment for Aphasia
NCT04413136 COMPLETED NA
Singing for People With Aphasia
NCT03076736 COMPLETED NA