Birth Weight-discordance in Twins Pregnancy: a Multicenter Retrospective Study
NCT ID: NCT05674214
Last Updated: 2023-06-07
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
13440 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2020-09-10
2022-11-25
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Relationship Between Pre-pregnancy BMI and Weight Gain and Outcomes in Women With Twin Pregnancy
NCT04777903
Cohort of Twin Pregnancy and the Offspring
NCT05727085
Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study of Twin Maternal-Child Dyads in China
NCT06414655
Retrospective Longitudinal Study of Gestational Weight Gain Among Chinese Pregnant Women
NCT03154268
Standardized Management of Pregnancy Weight of Twin Pregnancy
NCT04916405
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_CONTROL
RETROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
birth weight-discordant group
the birth weight difference within twins is greater than 20%
No interventions assigned to this group
the birth weight-concordant group
the birth weight difference within twins is less than or equal to 20%
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
1\. delivered from 2018 to 2020
Exclusion Criteria
2. inherited metabolic diseases
3. complex congenital heart disease
4. digestive tract malformations
1 Day
28 Days
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Peking University Third Hospital
OTHER
The Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University
OTHER
The Third Hospital Of BaoGang Group
UNKNOWN
Lanzhou University Second Hospital
OTHER
Yan'an University Affiliated Hospital
OTHER
Xiamen University Women and Children's Hospital
UNKNOWN
Xinxiang Central Hospital
OTHER
Central Hospital of Xiaogan
OTHER
Guizhou Medical University Affiliated Hospital
UNKNOWN
Sichuan Jinxin Women and Children's Hospital
UNKNOWN
The First Affiliated Hospital of Shaoyang University
UNKNOWN
First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University
OTHER
First Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College
OTHER
Second Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College
OTHER
The Second People's Hospital of GuangDong Province
OTHER
Dongguan People's Hospital
OTHER_GOV
Dongguan Binhai Bay Central Hospital
UNKNOWN
Zhongshan People's Hospital, Guangdong, China
OTHER
Huizhou Municipal Central Hospital
OTHER
Yuebei People's Hospital
OTHER
The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Bijun Shi
Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Hiersch L, Barrett J, Aviram A, Mei-Dan E, Yoon EW, Zaltz A, Kingdom J, Melamed N. Patterns of discordant growth and adverse neonatal outcomes in twins. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Aug;225(2):187.e1-187.e14. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.01.018. Epub 2021 Jan 25.
D'Antonio F, Thilaganathan B, Laoreti A, Khalil A; Southwest Thames Obstetric Research Collaborative (STORK). Birth-weight discordance and neonatal morbidity in twin pregnancy: analysis of STORK multiple pregnancy cohort. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Nov;52(5):586-592. doi: 10.1002/uog.18916. Epub 2018 Oct 8.
Jahanfar S, Lim K, Oviedo-Joekes E. Stillbirth Associated With Birth Weight Discordance in Twin Gestations. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2019 Jan;41(1):52-58. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2018.02.017. Epub 2018 Oct 10.
Miller J, Chauhan SP, Abuhamad AZ. Discordant twins: diagnosis, evaluation and management. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Jan;206(1):10-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.06.075. Epub 2011 Jun 25.
Diaz-Garcia C, Bernard JP, Ville Y, Salomon LJ. Validity of sonographic prediction of fetal weight and weight discordance in twin pregnancies. Prenat Diagn. 2010 Apr;30(4):361-7. doi: 10.1002/pd.2469.
D'Antonio F, Odibo AO, Prefumo F, Khalil A, Buca D, Flacco ME, Liberati M, Manzoli L, Acharya G. Weight discordance and perinatal mortality in twin pregnancy: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jul;52(1):11-23. doi: 10.1002/uog.18966.
D'Antonio F, Khalil A, Dias T, Thilaganathan B; Southwest Thames Obstetric Research Collaborative (STORK). Weight discordance and perinatal mortality in twins: analysis of the Southwest Thames Obstetric Research Collaborative (STORK) multiple pregnancy cohort. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Jun;41(6):643-8. doi: 10.1002/uog.12412. Epub 2013 Apr 22.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
ThirdGuangzhouMU_QL Cui
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.