Establishing Physiologic Outcomes for Ventricular Unloading on VA ECMO

NCT ID: NCT05658276

Last Updated: 2024-11-12

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

WITHDRAWN

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-12-15

Study Completion Date

2024-03-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Aim 1: Prospective, observational analysis of the association between echocardiographic measures of cardiac function and left ventricular unloading on VA ECMO.

Aim 2: Prospective, observational analysis of the association between clinical laboratory biomarkers and left ventricular unloading on VA ECMO.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) is increasingly utilized as a means of hemodynamic support among cardiogenic shock (CS) patients refractory to optimal medical management. MCS modalities include using either an intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP), Impella®, or ECMO, each with unique benefit/harm profiles. Among the various MCS devices, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is described as the highest level of support, capable of providing 5+ liters per minute of oxygenated blood flow but is the most invasive. Despite the benefit of maximal cardiopulmonary support, ECMO increases afterload in a failing heart. Left ventricular (LV) unloading or decompression (using simultaneous IABP or Impella®) has been suggested as potential improvement. Observational studies suggest a benefit with LV unloading during VA ECMO for CS, but the mechanisms underlying the association are poorly understood. Prior to trials, a mechanistic understanding of the effect of different LV unloading strategies on key physiologic abnormalities in CS is needed, as the physiologic effects of LV unloading during VA ECMO for CS remain insufficiently defined.

The objective of this study is to define serial changes in common clinical variables routinely obtained during management of patients in CS. These clinical variables are readily accessible to clinicians, but are not typically collected in a sufficiently granular serial manner to characterize their utility as clinical biomarkers. By obtaining scheduled assessments, repeated in a prospective cohort over the clinical course of CS, the investigators will define the physiologic effects of different LV unloading strategies in cardiogenic shock. We will examine a) echocardiographic measures of ventricular distension, and b) blood biochemical measures of peripheral perfusion.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cardiogenic Shock

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_ONLY

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

With LV Unloading

Adults (18+) who are in cardiogenic shock and being treated with mechanical circulatory support (veno-arterial ECMO) inserted peripherally. The patients in this group will also have an additional device, such as an Impella or an intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) for left ventricular unloading. The decision whether or not to unload the patient will be purely clinical.

Data will be collected from the patient's chart and entered into a secure database. A standard complete transthoracic echocardiogram will be completed at enrollment and then again 7 days from enrollment (+/- 2 days). Additional blood tests will be ordered for the 7 days after enrollment. All tests will be ordered on Day 1 (patient on ECMO, prior to any LV unloading) and additionally as follows:

* Troponin: Daily for 7 days
* NT-proBNP: Daily for 7 days
* PCO2 gap (in blood gas analysis): Every 6 hours for 3 days
* Lactate (in blood gas analysis): Every 12 hours for 3 days
* cBIN1: Twice in 7 days

No interventions assigned to this group

Without LV Unloading

Adults (18+) who are in cardiogenic shock and being treated with mechanical circulatory support (veno-arterial ECMO) inserted peripherally. The patients in this group will not have any LV unloading device in addition to the ECMO support. The decision not to do LV unloading will be purely clinical.

Data will be collected from the patient's chart and entered into a secure database. A standard complete transthoracic echocardiogram will be completed at enrollment and then again 7 days from enrollment (+/- 2 days). Additional blood tests will be ordered for the 7 days after enrollment. All tests will be ordered on Day 1 (patient on ECMO, prior to any LV unloading) and additionally as follows:

* Troponin: Daily for 7 days
* NT-proBNP: Daily for 7 days
* PCO2 gap (in blood gas analysis): Every 6 hours for 3 days
* Lactate (in blood gas analysis): Every 12 hours for 3 days
* cBIN1: Twice in 7 days

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients who are 18 years of age or older
* Patients with cardiogenic shock
* Patients with mechanical circulatory support, specifically veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA ECMO) inserted peripherally

Exclusion Criteria

* None
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Utah

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Joseph Tonna

Associate Professor, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Utah

Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

Site Status

University of Toronto

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Canada

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Tonna JE, Selzman CH, Bartos JA, Presson AP, Ou Z, Jo Y, Becker L, Youngquist ST, Thiagarajan RR, Johnson MA, Rycus P, Keenan HT. The Association of Modifiable Postresuscitation Management and Annual Case Volume With Survival After Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation. Crit Care Explor. 2022 Jul 25;4(7):e0733. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000733. eCollection 2022 Jul.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 35923595 (View on PubMed)

Rao P, Khalpey Z, Smith R, Burkhoff D, Kociol RD. Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Cardiogenic Shock and Cardiac Arrest. Circ Heart Fail. 2018 Sep;11(9):e004905. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.118.004905.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30354364 (View on PubMed)

Hitzeman TC, Xie Y, Zadikany RH, Nikolova AP, Baum R, Caldaruse AM, Agvanian S, Melmed GY, McGovern DPB, Geft DR, Chang DH, Moriguchi JD, Hage A, Azarbal B, Czer LS, Kittleson MM, Patel JK, Wu AHB, Kobashigawa JA, Hamilton M, Hong T, Shaw RM. cBIN1 Score (CS) Identifies Ambulatory HFrEF Patients and Predicts Cardiovascular Events. Front Physiol. 2020 May 25;11:503. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.00503. eCollection 2020.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32670075 (View on PubMed)

Nikolova AP, Hitzeman TC, Baum R, Caldaruse AM, Agvanian S, Xie Y, Geft DR, Chang DH, Moriguchi JD, Hage A, Azarbal B, Czer LS, Kittleson MM, Patel JK, Wu AHB, Kobashigawa JA, Hamilton M, Hong T, Shaw RM. Association of a Novel Diagnostic Biomarker, the Plasma Cardiac Bridging Integrator 1 Score, With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction and Cardiovascular Hospitalization. JAMA Cardiol. 2018 Dec 1;3(12):1206-1210. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2018.3539.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30383171 (View on PubMed)

Eckman PM, Katz JN, El Banayosy A, Bohula EA, Sun B, van Diepen S. Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Cardiogenic Shock: An Introduction for the Busy Clinician. Circulation. 2019 Dec 10;140(24):2019-2037. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.034512. Epub 2019 Dec 9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31815538 (View on PubMed)

Combes A, Price S, Slutsky AS, Brodie D. Temporary circulatory support for cardiogenic shock. Lancet. 2020 Jul 18;396(10245):199-212. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31047-3.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32682486 (View on PubMed)

Kim D, Jang WJ, Park TK, Cho YH, Choi JO, Jeon ES, Yang JH. Echocardiographic Predictors of Successful Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Weaning After Refractory Cardiogenic Shock. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2021 Apr;34(4):414-422.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2020.12.002. Epub 2020 Dec 13.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 33321165 (View on PubMed)

Aissaoui N, Luyt CE, Leprince P, Trouillet JL, Leger P, Pavie A, Diebold B, Chastre J, Combes A. Predictors of successful extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) weaning after assistance for refractory cardiogenic shock. Intensive Care Med. 2011 Nov;37(11):1738-45. doi: 10.1007/s00134-011-2358-2. Epub 2011 Oct 1.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21965097 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Informed Consent Form

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

142543

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.