Performance of Two Hydrophobic IOLs

NCT ID: NCT05639049

Last Updated: 2022-12-06

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

45 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-11-01

Study Completion Date

2024-11-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Comparison of the capsular bag performance of two hydrophobic intraocular lenses of different design.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Continuous improvements in cataract surgery technique, intraocular lens (IOL) materials, and design over the past few decades, have led to a more safe procedure with satisfactory refractive outcomes and a short rehabilitation time. By that, patients' expectations concerning their postoperative visual quality and refractive outcome are increasing. However, two main problems might occur after cataract surgery: instability of the IOL position in the capsular bag and formation of posterior capsule opacification (PCO). Both may decrease the optical performance of an IOL.

The performance of an IOL depends on its behaviour in the capsular bag, which has an influence on the anterior chamber depth (ACD), as well as the postoperative refractive shift, the tilt and decentration of the IOL. Several factors such as IOL design and material, capsulorhexis size, capsular bag diameter, and capsular fibrosis or shrinkage may lead to a suboptimal IOL position. Misalignment of an IOL away from the retina leads to a myopic shift, while towards the retina leads to a hyperopic outcome. This explains why inaccurate prediction of postoperative ACD remains the main source of error in IOL power calculation.

One main goal of modern cataract surgery is to yield a low and predictable ACD shift as well as low degrees of IOL tilt and decentration after surgery in order to achieve ideal optical performance of the IOL.

Another aspect of capsular bag performance of an IOL is posterior capsule opacification (PCO). PCO is one of the most frequent long-term complications after cataract surgery leading to dissatisfying results by decreased visual function. Source of PCO are lens epithelial cells from the equator of the lens capsule, which acquire the ability to migrate and proliferate, causing epithelial ingrowth between the IOL and the posterior capsule. It is estimated that PCO occurs at a rate of 12% one year, 21% three years, and 28% five years after cataract surgery. PCO can be treated with neodymium-doped yttrium aluminium garnet (Nd:YAG) laser capsulotomy. However, complications including an increase in intraocular pressure, ocular inflammation, cystoid macular edema, and retinal detachment may occur after this treatment. Hence lower rates of PCO would improve patients long term safety following cataract surgery. Moreover, it would increase patient satisfaction.

The material and design of an IOL may have an effect on the formation of PCO. Sharp optic edge design has been shown to be a major factor in the prevention of PCO. Furthermore, acrylic and silicone hydrophobic materials showed a lower risk for PCO formation and lower rates of postoperative Nd:YAG laser capsulotomy than hydrophilic IOLs.

In this study the ACD shift and IOL tilt and centration as well as the PCO formation of an IOL with a new design, the Enova GF3 IOL will be compared to a standard monofocal IOL, the Tecnis 1-piece ZCB00.

90 eyes of 45 patients will be included into this study. According to the randomization, the ENOVA GF3 will be implanted in one eye and the ZCB00 in the fellow eye of each patient. Follow-up visits will take place 1 week, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after the surgery. At each visit a slitlamp examination, non-contact intraocular pressure measurement, refraction, visual acuity testing, biometry, retroillumination photography, and purkinjemeter assessments will be performed.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cataract

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Enova GF3

Patient will receive the monofocal IOL in one eye during cataract surgery

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Enova GF3

Intervention Type DEVICE

Enova GF3, monofocal IOL

Tecnis 1-piece ZCB00

Patient will receive the monofocal IOL in one eye during cataract surgery

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Tecnis 1-piece ZCB00

Intervention Type DEVICE

Tecnis 1-piece ZCB00, monofocal IOL

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Enova GF3

Enova GF3, monofocal IOL

Intervention Type DEVICE

Tecnis 1-piece ZCB00

Tecnis 1-piece ZCB00, monofocal IOL

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age-related bilateral cataract
* Age 21 or older
* Visual acuity \> 0.05
* Normal findings in the medical history and physical examination unless the investigator considers an abnormality to be clinically irrelevant
* Written informed consent prior to surgery

Exclusion Criteria

* Relevant other ophthalmic diseases such as pseudoexfoliation syndrome (PEX), traumatic cataract, intraoperative Floppy Iris Syndrome (IFIS), or other co-morbidities that could affect capsular bag stability (e.g. Marfan syndrome)
* Any ophthalmic comorbidity that may compromise visual function or create problems with measurements (e.g. macular degeneration, amblyopia, corneal scars, etc.)
* Previous ocular surgery or trauma
* Pregnancy (pregnancy test will be taken in women of reproductive age)
Minimum Eligible Age

21 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

105 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Vienna Institute for Research in Ocular Surgery

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Prim. Prof. Dr. Oliver Findl, MBA

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Oliver Findl, Prof. Dr.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Vienna Institute for Research in Ocular Surgery

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Vienna Institute for Research in Ocular Surgery (VIROS), Hanusch Hospital Vienna

Vienna, , Austria

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Austria

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Christoph Spartalis, MD

Role: CONTACT

01 91021 ext. 57564

Manuel Ruiss, MSc

Role: CONTACT

01 91021 ext. 57564

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Oliver Findl, MD, MBA

Role: primary

+43 91021 ext. 57564

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Enova

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.