Kaneka iED Coil System for the Treatment of Wide Necked Ruptured and Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms

NCT ID: NCT05636124

Last Updated: 2025-07-09

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

50 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-06-02

Study Completion Date

2027-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is a multi-center, prospective, propensity matched twin armed study conducted on 50 patients in the experimental arm followed for 18 months after intervention evaluating cost effectiveness, safety and efficacy of therapy.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Although coiling has become the most common form of treatment for intracranial aneurysms, there is evidence to suggest that the cost of coiling is on average 50% greater than the cost of clipping. Device costs represent the majority of this increased financial burden. This issue has only increased over time, as supplies and devices accounted for 24% of the increase in hospital costs per discharge from 2001 to 2006. The list price of coils on the US market ranges from $500 to $3000, thus small changes in the number of coils used per case can result in a large cost saving. The Kaneka iED coil is priced within this normal range, but offers a multi-diameter design that may reduce the number of coils required to achieve adequate embolization.

Aside from potential cost savings across all aneurysm types, the ability of the Kaneka iED to both frame and fill with a single coil may prove particularly effective in the treatment of wide-necked aneurysms. In these cases, a wide neck at the base of the aneurysm increased the risk for protrusion of the coil mass back into the normal lumen of the vessel, which can result in stroke and other severe complications. Adjunctive devices such as balloon and stents are often employed to reconstruct the aneurysm neck in these cases, and larger coil mass provided by the Kaneka iED may additionally serve to decrease the risk of coil protrusion.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Intracranial Aneurysms Wide Neck Intracranial Aneurysms

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Kaneka i-ED coil

Patients in the experimental arm will be treated according to the standard of care for endovascular aneurysm coiling, with no procedural modifications related to the use of the experimental device.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Kaneka i-ED coil

Intervention Type DEVICE

The study device is the Kaneka i-ED coil T, FDA cleared under 510K number K192068. The coil is indicated for use in the endovascular embolization of intracranial aneurysms and other neurovascular abnormalities such as arteriovenous malformations and arteriovenous fistulae.

Matched patients who underwent intracranial aneurysm embolization

The comparator arm will be comprised of propensity matched patients who underwent intracranial aneurysm embolization as part of the FEAT Trial (NCT01655784).

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Kaneka i-ED coil

The study device is the Kaneka i-ED coil T, FDA cleared under 510K number K192068. The coil is indicated for use in the endovascular embolization of intracranial aneurysms and other neurovascular abnormalities such as arteriovenous malformations and arteriovenous fistulae.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patient presenting with ruptured or unruptured cerebral aneurysm appropriate for endovascular treatment as determined by the neuroendovascular treating team
* Wide neck side wall or bifurcation intracranial aneurysms (neck \> or = to 4 mm or dome-to-neck ratio \< 2) within the anterior or posterior circulation
* The neurointerventionist feels that the aneurysm can be safely treated using endovascular techniques (direct or assisted coiling)
* Patients are 18-80 years of age (inclusive)
* Patient must be Hunt and Hess grade 0 to 3
* Patient has given fully informed consent to endovascular coiling procedure. If the patient cannot consent for themselves, appropriate written consent has been sought from their next of kin or appropriate power of attorney.
* Aneurysm 6-14 mm in diameter
* Patient is willing and able to return for clinical evaluation and follow-up imaging evaluation (angiography) at 3-6 months and 12-18 months after endovascular treatment
* The patient has not been previously enrolled in this trial or another related ongoing trial
* The aneurysm has not been previously treated by coiling or clipping

* Target aneurysm has had previous coil treatment or has been surgically clipped
* Hunt and Hess score is 4 or 5 after subarachnoid hemorrhage
* Inability to obtain informed consent
* Medical or surgical comorbidity such that the patient's life expectancy is less than 2 years
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Kaneka Corporation

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Reade De Leacy

Associate Professor, Neurosurgery

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Reade De Leacy

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Sutter Health

Danville, California, United States

Site Status

Baptist Health Jacksonville

Jacksonville, Florida, United States

Site Status

University of South Florida

Tampa, Florida, United States

Site Status

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Prisma Health

Greenville, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Gandhoke GS, Pandya YK, Jadhav AP, Jovin T, Friedlander RM, Smith KJ, Jankowitz BT. Cost of coils for intracranial aneurysms: clinical decision analysis for implementation of a capitation model. J Neurosurg. 2018 Jun;128(6):1792-1798. doi: 10.3171/2017.3.JNS163149. Epub 2017 Aug 25.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28841115 (View on PubMed)

Bairstow P, Dodgson A, Linto J, Khangure M. Comparison of cost and outcome of endovascular and neurosurgical procedures in the treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms. Australas Radiol. 2002 Sep;46(3):249-51. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1673.2002.01053.x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12196230 (View on PubMed)

Maeda JL, Raetzman SO, Friedman BS. What hospital inpatient services contributed the most to the 2001-2006 growth in the cost per case? Health Serv Res. 2012 Oct;47(5):1814-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2012.01460.x. Epub 2012 Sep 4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22946883 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Informed Consent Form

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

STUDY-22-01480

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Concussion Pen Screening Tool
NCT05432752 COMPLETED NA