Kaneka iED Coil System for the Treatment of Wide Necked Ruptured and Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms
NCT ID: NCT05636124
Last Updated: 2025-07-09
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
NA
50 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-06-02
2027-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Contrast-enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography Investigation of Intracranial Aneurysms and Prospective Study of Risk Factors
NCT00997698
Magnetic Resonance Venography Pre- and Post-Treatment in Patients With Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension
NCT02394067
4D FLOW: Feasibility Study of a Sequence 4D of Flow Applied to the Cervico-encephalic Vascular Pathologies
NCT02602951
Optical Coherence Tomography Imaging of Post Coil Aneurysm Healing.
NCT00556309
Evaluation of a Carbon Nanotube Enabled Solid-State Head CT
NCT04495634
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Aside from potential cost savings across all aneurysm types, the ability of the Kaneka iED to both frame and fill with a single coil may prove particularly effective in the treatment of wide-necked aneurysms. In these cases, a wide neck at the base of the aneurysm increased the risk for protrusion of the coil mass back into the normal lumen of the vessel, which can result in stroke and other severe complications. Adjunctive devices such as balloon and stents are often employed to reconstruct the aneurysm neck in these cases, and larger coil mass provided by the Kaneka iED may additionally serve to decrease the risk of coil protrusion.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Kaneka i-ED coil
Patients in the experimental arm will be treated according to the standard of care for endovascular aneurysm coiling, with no procedural modifications related to the use of the experimental device.
Kaneka i-ED coil
The study device is the Kaneka i-ED coil T, FDA cleared under 510K number K192068. The coil is indicated for use in the endovascular embolization of intracranial aneurysms and other neurovascular abnormalities such as arteriovenous malformations and arteriovenous fistulae.
Matched patients who underwent intracranial aneurysm embolization
The comparator arm will be comprised of propensity matched patients who underwent intracranial aneurysm embolization as part of the FEAT Trial (NCT01655784).
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Kaneka i-ED coil
The study device is the Kaneka i-ED coil T, FDA cleared under 510K number K192068. The coil is indicated for use in the endovascular embolization of intracranial aneurysms and other neurovascular abnormalities such as arteriovenous malformations and arteriovenous fistulae.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Wide neck side wall or bifurcation intracranial aneurysms (neck \> or = to 4 mm or dome-to-neck ratio \< 2) within the anterior or posterior circulation
* The neurointerventionist feels that the aneurysm can be safely treated using endovascular techniques (direct or assisted coiling)
* Patients are 18-80 years of age (inclusive)
* Patient must be Hunt and Hess grade 0 to 3
* Patient has given fully informed consent to endovascular coiling procedure. If the patient cannot consent for themselves, appropriate written consent has been sought from their next of kin or appropriate power of attorney.
* Aneurysm 6-14 mm in diameter
* Patient is willing and able to return for clinical evaluation and follow-up imaging evaluation (angiography) at 3-6 months and 12-18 months after endovascular treatment
* The patient has not been previously enrolled in this trial or another related ongoing trial
* The aneurysm has not been previously treated by coiling or clipping
* Target aneurysm has had previous coil treatment or has been surgically clipped
* Hunt and Hess score is 4 or 5 after subarachnoid hemorrhage
* Inability to obtain informed consent
* Medical or surgical comorbidity such that the patient's life expectancy is less than 2 years
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Kaneka Corporation
INDUSTRY
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Reade De Leacy
Associate Professor, Neurosurgery
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Reade De Leacy
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Sutter Health
Danville, California, United States
Baptist Health Jacksonville
Jacksonville, Florida, United States
University of South Florida
Tampa, Florida, United States
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
New York, New York, United States
Prisma Health
Greenville, South Carolina, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Gandhoke GS, Pandya YK, Jadhav AP, Jovin T, Friedlander RM, Smith KJ, Jankowitz BT. Cost of coils for intracranial aneurysms: clinical decision analysis for implementation of a capitation model. J Neurosurg. 2018 Jun;128(6):1792-1798. doi: 10.3171/2017.3.JNS163149. Epub 2017 Aug 25.
Bairstow P, Dodgson A, Linto J, Khangure M. Comparison of cost and outcome of endovascular and neurosurgical procedures in the treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms. Australas Radiol. 2002 Sep;46(3):249-51. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1673.2002.01053.x.
Maeda JL, Raetzman SO, Friedman BS. What hospital inpatient services contributed the most to the 2001-2006 growth in the cost per case? Health Serv Res. 2012 Oct;47(5):1814-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2012.01460.x. Epub 2012 Sep 4.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Informed Consent Form
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
STUDY-22-01480
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.