Stepped-Wedge Cluster Randomized Trial of AI-Assisted CTA Detection for Intracranial Aneurysms in Regional Hospitals
NCT ID: NCT07124624
Last Updated: 2025-08-20
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
14400 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-10-09
2029-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
IDEAL Study: Blinded RCT for the Impact of AI Model for Cerebral Aneurysms Detection on Patients' Diagnosis and Outcomes
NCT06118840
AI Models for Cerebral Aneurysms Segmentation, Detection and Stability Prediction
NCT06766422
Retrospective Study on the Direction of Artificial Intelligence in Identifying Cranial Trauma CT Imaging
NCT06230419
Clinical Diagnosis and Treatment of Intracerebral Hemorrhage Based on Artificial Intelligence
NCT04951570
Stroke Imaging Package Study of Intracranial Atherosclerosis ( SIPS-ICAS )
NCT03719820
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
In the control group, diagnoses and treatments will follow local standard clinical protocols. In the intervention group, diagnostic procedures will be supported by an artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted system. The primary outcome is the detection rate of intracranial aneurysms, as determined from radiology reports at the patient level. Secondary outcomes include additional diagnostic performance metrics on CTA, such as the detection of intracranial arterial stenosis, occlusion, and tumors.
Follow-up evaluations at 3 and 12 months will assess treatment-related indicators-including repeat head CTA or magnetic resonance angiography (MRA), hospitalization rates, and digital subtraction angiography (DSA) utilization-as well as clinical outcomes related to aneurysm events. These measures aim to evaluate both the short- and long-term impacts of AI-assisted diagnosis on routine clinical practice and patient prognosis.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
SEQUENTIAL
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
AI-Assisted Diagnosis
Patients in this group will undergo head CTA, interpreted by radiologists with the assistance of a previously validated deep learning AI model. The model highlights suspected aneurysm candidates on the CTA images to support diagnostic decision-making.
AI-Assisted CTA Interpretation
A locked, independently validated deep learning model was used to assist radiologists in interpreting head CTA scans. The model was trained on 16,546 CTA cases and externally validated on an independent set of 900 DSA-verified CTA cases, achieving a patient-level sensitivity of 0.943 and an average of 0.187 false positives per case.
Standard Diagnosis
Patients in this group will undergo head CTA, which will be interpreted by radiologists following standard local diagnostic protocols. No AI assistance will be provided during image interpretation.
Standard CTA Interpretation
Head CTA interpretation performed by radiologists using local routine diagnostic workflows without AI support.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
AI-Assisted CTA Interpretation
A locked, independently validated deep learning model was used to assist radiologists in interpreting head CTA scans. The model was trained on 16,546 CTA cases and externally validated on an independent set of 900 DSA-verified CTA cases, achieving a patient-level sensitivity of 0.943 and an average of 0.187 false positives per case.
Standard CTA Interpretation
Head CTA interpretation performed by radiologists using local routine diagnostic workflows without AI support.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* History of cerebrovascular surgery involving any metallic implants (e.g., aneurysm embolization, aneurysm clipping, or vascular stenting)
* Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score \> 3
* Refuse to sign written informed consent
* Contraindications to CTA examination
* CTA scan failure, incomplete imaging data, or image quality insufficient for diagnostic evaluation
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Jinling Hospital, China
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Zhang longjiang,MD
Head of Radiology
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2025DZKY-087-01
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.