The Impact of Two-field or Three-field Lymphadenectomy on Overall Survival in Middle and Lower Thoracic Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: An Observational Study

NCT ID: NCT05617352

Last Updated: 2022-11-21

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

1659 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-05-01

Study Completion Date

2022-10-10

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

To clarify the effect of Two-field or Three-field Lymphadenectomy on the survival of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Esophageal Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

OTHER

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

2F Group

Patients with Two-field Lymphadenectomy

Since the data were collected retrospectively, there were no interventions

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Since the data were collected retrospectively, there were no interventions

3F Group

Patients with Three-field Lymphadenectomy

Since the data were collected retrospectively, there were no interventions

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Since the data were collected retrospectively, there were no interventions

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Since the data were collected retrospectively, there were no interventions

Since the data were collected retrospectively, there were no interventions

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* 1\. Men and women aged 18-85 years
* 2\. Histologically confirmed primary thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma,
* 3\. Staging PT1b-4A, N0-3, M0 AJCC eighth edition
* 4\. Excluding lymph node dissection \< 15, (meeting the guideline criteria)
* 5\. The tumor located in the lower middle thoracic.

Exclusion Criteria

* 1\. Patients with a history of previous thoracic and abdominal surgery that may affect lymphatic reflux
* 2\. Patients with distant metastasis confirmed by imaging
* 3\. Patients with obvious surgical contraindications.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

90 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Yongtao Han

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Yongtao Han

Clinical Professor

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Sichuan Cancer Hospital

Chengdu, Sichuan, China

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

SCCH-TS2204

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.