Relieving Chronic Pain in Older Adults With Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
NCT ID: NCT05617027
Last Updated: 2025-03-04
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
150 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-10-19
2025-06-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Clinical Setting to Reduce Pain in Older Workers
NCT05370833
Chronic Pain and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Clinical Settings
NCT04726423
Analgesic Effect of Non Invasive Stimulation : Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of Opercular-insular Cortex
NCT03015558
Exploration of Parameters of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) in Chronic Pain
NCT01402960
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Chronic Low Back Pain
NCT02768129
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Objectives : The primary objective of this study is to determine, in a healthcare setting, the effectiveness of actual tDCS in reducing pain compared with placebo tDCS. Secondary objectives are to assess the effect of tDCS on pain-related interference and the relationship between the response to tDCS and the integrity of pain control systems (descending pathways controlling pain circuits).
Methods : This is a multicenter randomized controlled trial with parallel groups (real tDCS vs. placebo) blinded to participants, assessors and tDCS providers. The real tDCS group will receive a daily 20-minute session of tDCS (current intensity = 2 mA), for 5 consecutive days, while the placebo tDCS group will receive an equivalent treatment, but the current will be stopped after the first 30 seconds. The study will take place in 5 rehabilitation clinics in 3 Quebec regions: Sherbrooke (n=1), Quebec City (n=2), Montreal (n=2). One hundred and fifty (150) seniors aged 65 years or older with chronic (\> 6 months), moderate to severe musculoskeletal pain will be recruited (50 participants/region). Follow-ups will take place at 1 week and 3 months post-treatment. The primary dependent variable is pain intensity (numerical scale from 0 to 10). Secondary variables will be measured using standardized and validated questionnaires: 1) pain-related interferences (physical function, mood, quality of life) and 2) perception of post-TDCS changes. Neurophysiological measures (pain control pathways), i.e., the integrity of corticothalamic and corticospinal projections will be tested by diffusion MRI and transcranial magnetic stimulation.
Anticipated results: Our hypotheses are that (i) real tDCS will be more effective in reducing pain intensity than placebo tDCS at 1 week post-treatment. This reduction in pain will be maintained at the 3-month post-treatment follow-up of real tDCS. (ii) Real tDCS will be more effective than placebo treatment in reducing pain interference with physical function, mood and quality of life. Perceived improvement with the treatment received will also be greater for real tDCS. (iii) Individuals with stronger cortico-thalamic and corticospinal projections in pre-tDCS will be more relieved by actual tDCS than those with less strong projections.
Ultimately, this study will allow us to evaluate the effectiveness of tDCS in the care setting for the relief of chronic musculoskeletal pain in the elderly and to identify those individuals most likely to respond to this type of treatment based on potential biomarkers related to the integrity of the pain control system.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
actual tDCS
The actual transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) intervention will be conducted by a physiotherapist who will perform 5 sessions of actual tDCS , 5 consecutive days, for 20 minutes of treatment for a total of 45 minutes at the clinic for each session.
The tDCS current will be 2 mA for the whole 20-minute session.
actual transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)
tDCS is a non-invasive brain stimulation technique that would influence the brain's pain control mechanisms.
The anode is attached to the skull above the M1 opposite the painful side (in case of unilateral pain) or opposite the dominant hand (in case of bilateral pain). The cathode (at the supraorbital level opposite the stimulated M1) will be positioned using the 10-20 EEG system and the tDCS intensity will be 2 mA.
placebo tDCS
The placebo transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) intervention will be conducted by a physiotherapist who will perform 5 sessions of placebo tDCS, 5 consecutive days, for 20 minutes of treatment for a total of 45 minutes at the clinic for each session.
The tDCS current will be 2 mA for 30 secondes, and then will strop for the rest of the 20-minute session (programming of the equipment).
placebo transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)
The anode is attached to the skull above the M1 opposite the painful side (in case of unilateral pain) or opposite the dominant hand (in case of bilateral pain). The cathode (at the supraorbital level opposite the stimulated M1) will be positioned using the 10-20 EEG system and the tDCS intensity will be 2 mA for 30 secondes, and then 0 mA for the rest of the 20-minute session.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
actual transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)
tDCS is a non-invasive brain stimulation technique that would influence the brain's pain control mechanisms.
The anode is attached to the skull above the M1 opposite the painful side (in case of unilateral pain) or opposite the dominant hand (in case of bilateral pain). The cathode (at the supraorbital level opposite the stimulated M1) will be positioned using the 10-20 EEG system and the tDCS intensity will be 2 mA.
placebo transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)
The anode is attached to the skull above the M1 opposite the painful side (in case of unilateral pain) or opposite the dominant hand (in case of bilateral pain). The cathode (at the supraorbital level opposite the stimulated M1) will be positioned using the 10-20 EEG system and the tDCS intensity will be 2 mA for 30 secondes, and then 0 mA for the rest of the 20-minute session.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Have chronic (≥ 6 months) musculoskeletal pain of moderate to severe intensity (≥4 out of 10 on a numerical scale of 0 to 10)
Exclusion Criteria
* Those with contraindications to TMS
* Those with contraindications to IRM
* Individuals for whom the procedure could cause impairment of well-being, or has another medical condition that could put them at risk in the judgment of a health care professional.
* Patients taking medications that act on the GABAergic and glutamatergic systems (modulating tDCS effects) will be excluded
* Individuals taking other types of medications or receiving rehabilitation are not excluded but will be asked, in the absence of clinical contraindication, to avoid any modification (e.g., new treatment, discontinuation, or change in dose) during the study.
* People with epilepsy and seizures will not be excluded from the study. The research team will simply be asked to pay closer attention to these participants during the administration of MST.
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
OTHER_GOV
Université de Sherbrooke
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Guillume Léonard
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Université de Sherbrooke
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Institut universitaire sur la réadaptation en déficience physique de Montréal (IURDPM)
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
CHU de Québec-Université Laval
Québec, Quebec, Canada
Centre de recherche sur le vieillissement (CdRV)
Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Guillaume Leonard, Ph.D., pht.
Role: backup
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
MP-31-2022-4641
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.