Suction Diathermy Adenoidectomy (SDA) : Efficacy and Safety
NCT ID: NCT05615506
Last Updated: 2022-12-01
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
40 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-10-12
2023-10-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Coblation Versus Suction Diathermy in Pediatric Adenoidectomy
NCT06841432
Speech Outcome After Partial Adenoidectomy in Patients With Risk of Hypernasality
NCT05273853
Intranasal Midazolam for Preanasthetic Sedation for Preschool Children Undergoing Adenotonsillectomy.
NCT07045597
Nebulized Versus Intravenous Dexmedetomidine for Sevoflurane Induced Emergence Agitation After Pediatric Tonsillectomy
NCT05641376
Adeno-tonsillectomy in Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea
NCT03475329
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
patients
suction diathermy adenoidectomy
Suction Diathermy Adenoidectomy
suction diathermy adenoidectomy
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Suction Diathermy Adenoidectomy
suction diathermy adenoidectomy
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Adenoid hypertrophy is the only cause of nasal obstruction.
3. Radiography evidence of adenoid hypertrophy encroaching on the airway column.
4. Age under 15 years.
5. Sex: both males and females.
6. All patients are generally well and fit for surgery.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Patients with other causes of nasal obstruction such as acute rhinitis, allergic rhinitis, septal deviation, inferior turbinate hypertrophy, antrochoanal polyp, nasal polypi or anatomical deformities (Choanal atresia).
3. Cases with submucous cleft palate and cases with a previous history of cleft palate repair.
4. Patients with bleeding or coagulation defects.
5. Patients with atrophic rhinitis.
6. Patients with recurrent adenoid.
15 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Sohag University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Amr Hamed Hashem
principal investigator
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Amr Hamed Hashem
Sohag, , Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
elhussein a ali, a.professor
Role: CONTACT
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Gates GA, Muntz HR, Gaylis B. Adenoidectomy and otitis media. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl. 1992 Jan;155:24-32. doi: 10.1177/00034894921010s106.
Dinis PB, Haider H, Gomes A. The effects of adenoid hypertrophy and subsequent adenoidectomy on pediatric nasal airway resistance. Am J Rhinol. 1999 Sep-Oct;13(5):363-9. doi: 10.2500/105065899781367564.
Clemens J, McMurray JS, Willging JP. Electrocautery versus curette adenoidectomy: comparison of postoperative results. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 1998 Mar 1;43(2):115-22. doi: 10.1016/s0165-5876(97)00159-6.
Shapiro NL, Bhattacharyya N. Cold dissection versus coblation-assisted adenotonsillectomy in children. Laryngoscope. 2007 Mar;117(3):406-10. doi: 10.1097/MLG.0b013e31802ffe47.
Pagella F, Pusateri A, Canzi P, Caputo M, Marseglia A, Pelizzo G, Matti E. The evolution of the adenoidectomy: analysis of different power-assisted techniques. Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol. 2011 Oct;24(4 Suppl):55-9. doi: 10.1177/03946320110240S411.
Wright ED, Manoukian JJ, Shapiro RS. Ablative adenoidectomy: a new technique using simultaneous liquefaction/aspiration. J Otolaryngol. 1997 Feb;26(1):36-43.
Regmi D, Mathur NN, Bhattarai M. Rigid endoscopic evaluation of conventional curettage adenoidectomy. J Laryngol Otol. 2011 Jan;125(1):53-8. doi: 10.1017/S0022215110002100. Epub 2010 Oct 18.
Agrawal V, Agarwal PK, Agrawal A. Defining the Surgical Limits of Adenoidectomy so as to Prevent Recurrence of Adenoids. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016 Jun;68(2):131-4. doi: 10.1007/s12070-016-0971-7. Epub 2016 Mar 12.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
soh-med-22-10-10
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.