Postoperative Sore Throat: Interest of the Videolaryngoscope
NCT ID: NCT05614414
Last Updated: 2022-11-14
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
135 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-01-08
2021-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
This was a prospective, randomized study, over a period of 9 months. The investigators included 136 patients with non-difficult airway, classified ASA I to III and over 18 years old. The patients were randomized into 2 groups: the VL group including 70 patients intubated with direct laryngoscopy and the LD group including 66 patients intubated with videolaryngoscopy.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Do we Intubate Faster With the Videolaryngoscope?
NCT05851664
Assessment of Post-operative Sore Throat After Scheduled General Anesthesia
NCT04115865
Effects of Three Airway Instruments on the Incidence of Postoperative Sore Throat
NCT06515808
Incidence of Sore Throat With Traditional Intubation Blades or Glidescope Blade
NCT02033564
Comparison of Postoperative Sore Throat Following Endotracheal Intubation Performed With Videolaryngoscope, Videostylet, and Fiberoptic Bronchoscope
NCT07077733
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The investigators pre-oxygenated the patients until the fractional expired oxygen was over 90%, then induced anaesthesia using either 2.5 to 3.5 mg/kg of propofol or 0.3 to 0.4 mg/kg of etomidate, then 1mg/kg of suxamethonium (in absence of contraindication). If modified crash induction was performed, the anaesthesiologist mentioned the opioid used.
The investigators performed laryngoscopy using either a Macintosh laryngoscope using a number 4 blade in LD group, or a McGrath video-laryngoscope with a number 4 blade in VL group and a stylet when needed. Women were intubated using number 7 tube and man using a 7.5 tube. They inflated the cuff with 7ml of air, and controlled pressure by manometer every 30 minutes in order to maintain it between 20 and 25 mmHg.
The investigators ventilated patients with assisted controlled mode using a 6ml/kg of ideal weight volume, a 6 mmHg PEEP, a 50% inspired fraction of oxygen and a respiratory rate guaranteeing an end-expiratory CO2 level between 35 and 40 mmHg. Then, they administrated 4 mg of Ondansetran in order to prevent postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV).
The investigators maintained anaesthesia using either isoflurane or sevoflurane, 0.1 μg/kg of sufentanil and 0.05 mg/kg of atracurium.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
VL Group
Patients who were intubated by videolaryngoscope.
tracheal intubation by Videolaryngoscope
The investigators performed laryngoscopy using a McGrath video-laryngoscope with a number 4 blade.
LD Group
Patients who were intubated by direct laryngoscope
tracheal intubation by direct laryngoscope
The investigators performed laryngoscopy using either a Macintosh laryngoscope using a number 4 blade.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
tracheal intubation by Videolaryngoscope
The investigators performed laryngoscopy using a McGrath video-laryngoscope with a number 4 blade.
tracheal intubation by direct laryngoscope
The investigators performed laryngoscopy using either a Macintosh laryngoscope using a number 4 blade.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients with ASA status 1, 2 or 3;
* Patients who underwent surgery with general anaesthesia and intubation;
* written consent.
Exclusion Criteria
* Pregnant women;
* Patient with at least two difficult intubation criteria or a limited mouth opening (under 2cm), difficult airway management history, upper airway tumour or cervical rachis trauma;
* Patients who had an otorhinolaryngologic infection in the last month, an intubation or endoscopy of upper airway in the last 48 hours, vomiting in the last 24 hours, a gastric tube in the last 24 hours or throat symptoms prior to surgery;
* Patients scheduled for a surgery implying a manipulation of upper airways;
* Patient scheduled for a surgery \> 2 hours.
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Mongi Slim Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Mhamed Sami Mebazaa
Professor
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Mongi Slim University Hospital
La Marsa, Tunis Governorate, Tunisia
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Sore throat videolaryngoscope
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.