A Prospective,Randomised, Open Label Study for Comparison of the Incidence and Severity of Postoperative Sore Throat (POST) Using C-MAC Video Laryngoscope and Traditional Macintosh Laryngoscope for Intubation

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

54 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-01-01

Study Completion Date

2021-01-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of this study is to compare the incidence of postoperative sore throat after intubation with two different types of laryngoscopes.

Related Clinical Trials

Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.

POST: Comparison of Macintosh Laryngoscope vs Video Laryngoscope in Patients Intubated by Anaesthesia Trainee

NCT04334616

Sore Throat

COMPLETED NA

Intubation with Different Angled Intubation Tubes Using C-macr D Blade Videolaringoscope;

NCT06011967

Intubation; Difficult or Failed Sore-throat Hoarseness

COMPLETED NA

The Effects of Bimanual Laryngoscopy on Post-Operative Sore Throat in Adults

NCT01459354

Postoperative Sorethroat Bimanual Laryngoscopy

UNKNOWN

Comparison of Postoperative Sore Throat Following Endotracheal Intubation Performed With Videolaryngoscope, Videostylet, and Fiberoptic Bronchoscope

NCT07077733

Postoperative Sore Throat

COMPLETED

Postoperative Sore Throat: Interest of the Videolaryngoscope

NCT05614414

Sore-throat Anesthesia Postoperative Pain +1 more

COMPLETED NA

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Postoperative sore throat is a well known complication after endotracheal intubation. One of the major contributing factors is trauma associated with laryngoscopy. With decreased force applied to visualise cords, video laryngoscopes should decrease the incidence of postoperative sore throat. In this study we compared the incidence and severity of postoperative sore throat when laryngoscopy was done using c-mac video laryngoscope D-blade( group V) versus Macintosh laryngoscope (Group M). Method: Fifty four American society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) 1\&2 patients between age 18-60 years , undergoing laproscopic surgeries of short duration were included in this study and laryngoscopy was done with Macintosh laryngoscope in M group and with C MAC video laryngoscope D blade in V group. Patients were followed up 2hours, 6hours, 12hours and 24hours in postoperative period to see postoperative sore throat and hoarseness of voice .

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hoarseness of Voice Sore-throat

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

A prospective,randomised, open label study

Primary Study Purpose

SCREENING

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

M group

Group Intubated with Macintosh laryngoscope is labelled as M group

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Intubation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Study groups Intubated with Macintosh or cmac video laryngoscopes

V group

Group Intubated with C-Mac video laryngoscope is labelled as V group

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Intubation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Study groups Intubated with Macintosh or cmac video laryngoscopes

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Intubation

Study groups Intubated with Macintosh or cmac video laryngoscopes

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age more than 18 years
* American society of Anaesthesiologists(ASA)1 and 2
* Mallampati (MPC) grading 1 and 2
* laparoscopic cholecystectomy and appendectomy
* Surgeries of short duration(\<2hour)

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients refusing to give consent
* Pregnant and lactating patients
* Patients with severe co-morbidities requiring postoperative ventilatory support

Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No