Two Bed SPECT/CT Versus Planar Bone Scintigraphy in Detection of Osseous Metastases in Patients With Genitourinary Malignancies
NCT ID: NCT05597215
Last Updated: 2022-10-27
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
70 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2022-12-31
2024-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Double-bed SPECT/CT for Bone Scintigraphy in Initial Staging of Cancer Patients
NCT03353090
18F-NaF-PET/MR vs 99mTc-MDP-SPECT/CT to Detect Bone Metastases in Prostate Cancer Patients.
NCT02969564
Assessment of the Accuracy of PET/MR in Detection and Monitoring Response of Bone Metastases
NCT04159376
Prognostic Value of SPECT-CT Quantitative Indices for the Response Assessment of Bone Metastatic Prostate Carcinoma
NCT03382522
Role of Positron Emission Tomography/ Computed Tomography (PET/CT) and in Bone Metastases.
NCT04080271
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_ONLY
PROSPECTIVE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Tc-99m MDP and gamma camera
Injection of radioactive element (Tc-99m MDP) then imaging with gamma camera and low dose CT (SPECT/CT)
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients refuse to do the scan.
* Patients with relative or absolute contraindications to do the scan (eg. pregnancy).
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Assiut University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Maram Mostafa Shafeek
Principal investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Samir S Mohamed, Professor
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Assiut University
HebatAllah A Askar, Lecturer
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Assiut University
Rehab M Helmy, Lecturer
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Assiut University
Maram M Shafeek, Resident
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Assiut University
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Zarrabi K, Paroya A, Wu S. Emerging therapeutic agents for genitourinary cancers. J Hematol Oncol. 2019 Sep 4;12(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s13045-019-0780-z.
Costa WH, Jabboure G Netto, Cunha IW. Urological cancer related to familial syndromes. Int Braz J Urol. 2017 Mar-Apr;43(2):192-201. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2016.0125.
Van den Wyngaert T, Strobel K, Kampen WU, Kuwert T, van der Bruggen W, Mohan HK, Gnanasegaran G, Delgado-Bolton R, Weber WA, Beheshti M, Langsteger W, Giammarile F, Mottaghy FM, Paycha F; EANM Bone & Joint Committee and the Oncology Committee. The EANM practice guidelines for bone scintigraphy. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016 Aug;43(9):1723-38. doi: 10.1007/s00259-016-3415-4. Epub 2016 Jun 4.
Rager O, Nkoulou R, Exquis N, Garibotto V, Tabouret-Viaud C, Zaidi H, Amzalag G, Lee-Felker SA, Zilli T, Ratib O. Whole-Body SPECT/CT versus Planar Bone Scan with Targeted SPECT/CT for Metastatic Workup. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:7039406. doi: 10.1155/2017/7039406. Epub 2017 Jul 24.
Umer M, Mohib Y, Atif M, Nazim M. Skeletal metastasis in renal cell carcinoma: A review. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2018 Jan 31;27:9-16. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2018.01.002. eCollection 2018 Mar.
Shen G, Deng H, Hu S, Jia Z. Comparison of choline-PET/CT, MRI, SPECT, and bone scintigraphy in the diagnosis of bone metastases in patients with prostate cancer: a meta-analysis. Skeletal Radiol. 2014 Nov;43(11):1503-13. doi: 10.1007/s00256-014-1903-9. Epub 2014 May 20.
de Leiris N, Leenhardt J, Boussat B, Montemagno C, Seiller A, Phan Sy O, Roux J, Laramas M, Verry C, Iriart C, Fiard G, Long JA, Descotes JL, Vuillez JP, Riou L, Djaileb L. Does whole-body bone SPECT/CT provide additional diagnostic information over [18F]-FCH PET/CT for the detection of bone metastases in the setting of prostate cancer biochemical recurrence? Cancer Imaging. 2020 Aug 12;20(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s40644-020-00333-y.
Zacho HD, Manresa JAB, Aleksyniene R, Ejlersen JA, Fledelius J, Bertelsen H, Petersen LJ. Three-minute SPECT/CT is sufficient for the assessment of bone metastasis as add-on to planar bone scintigraphy: prospective head-to-head comparison to 11-min SPECT/CT. EJNMMI Res. 2017 Dec;7(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s13550-016-0252-1. Epub 2017 Jan 5.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Tc-99m MDP bone scintigraphy
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.