An International Study on the Use of PET/CT in Radiotherapy Planning in Low and Middle Income Countries

NCT ID: NCT02247713

Last Updated: 2014-09-25

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Total Enrollment

520 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-09-30

Study Completion Date

2017-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

A part retrospective, part prospective cohort study to assess the difference in 2-year overall survival in patients with stage III NSCLC receiving chemoradiotherapy with curative intent in low and middle income countries before and after a training intervention on the use of PET/CT for radiotherapy treatment planning.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Over the years, the incidence of lung cancer has risen in some low and middle income countries due to the rise in tobacco use. Patients commonly present with lung cancer in an advanced stage (stage III and IV) are not suitable for surgical resection, but may be considered for radiotherapy. For patients in those countries who are not suitable for surgical resection, radiotherapy offers the best chance of cure, best improvement in local cancer control, best palliation and fewest side-effects. For accurate patient selection for curative treatment and accurate staging of lung cancer, the use of fused 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/ Computed Tomography (FDG PET/CT) imaging has been shown to be superior to CT alone. It has also been shown to have a significant impact when used in the radiation treatment planning process and in particular for when used for target volume delineation, where a significant reduction in interobserver variation has been noted.

In recent years, many health care institutions in low and middle income countries have established Nuclear Medicine (NM) imaging in routine clinical practice in conjunction with modern Radiation Oncology (RO) facilities. The installation of hybrid PET/CT systems in these countries permits more the increased use of PET/CT for both staging and radiotherapy planning. However the successful implementation of PET/CT for radiotherapy planning (RTP) requires a degree of expertise to safely and accurately implement this imaging technique. A recently published review by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), about current trends in NM in developing countries showed there is still lack of expertise, equipment and human resources to gain benefit from this imaging technique. In RO, difficulties in the implementation of this technique are mainly related to inadequate training of staff and lack of local expertise.

Quality assurance of the PET/CT scanners might be compromised when not performed according to accepted nuclear medicine quality assurance standards. Therefore, there is a concern that, if used without appropriate training or expertise, suboptimal image quality may result and inappropriate interpretation of the PET/CT for RTP may occur. In this study to help provide PET Quality Control will be executed to aim for a standardized PET image quality that meets the minimum requirements of European Association of Nuclear Medicine standards. Participating centers will be assisted to earn the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM) Research Ltd (EARL) accreditation. The quality of the imaging can be influenced by physiological and technical factors. The Standardized Uptake Value (SUV) allows for semi quantitative evaluation in PET imaging, and is influenced by these factors. Spatial resolution affects SUV values significantly and this parameter can differ a lot between multiple centers. The EANM NEMA NU 2001/2007 2 Image Quality Phantom allows for standardization of PET imaging between centers with different scanners, using the activity coefficient recovery curve (ACRC) as a parameter for quantification of this spatial resolution.

It is already known that FDG PET/CT based RTP enables appropriate selection of patients who will benefit from curative radiation therapy. One possible cause of failure in radiotherapy is the inability to accurately define the tumor edges. In these patients there are no other possible curative salvage treatment options and the disease is incurable. It is hoped that FDG PET/CT based RTP will improve tumor volume delineation (TVD) and hence improve outcomes following curative radiotherapy. There is also clear evidence that PET/CT standardizes TVD in patients with NSCLC. However, what is not known is the impact of PET/CT based TVD on patient outcomes such as survival as distinct from the benefit of PET/CT for patient selection for curative treatment. Furthermore, the impact of a training intervention on the use of PET/CT RTP in 2-year overall survival has not been studied to the best of our knowledge.

This study will evaluate the possible impact of the use of PET/CT for TVD on 2-year overall survival in patients with stage III NSCLC referred for curative intent radiotherapy with chemotherapy in low and middle income countries, this study involves a retrospective cohort study, a training intervention, and a prospective cohort study. The training intervention will focus on standard FDG PET/CT acquisition, FDG PET/CT image quality, staging procedure for FDG PET/CT acquisition and FDG PET/CT for RTP acquisition and Tumor Volume Delineation.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Non Small Cell Lung Cancer Stage III

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Retrospective cohort

Participating centers will retrospectively provide demographic, tumor, treatment and follow-up details on at least 25 consecutive patients with stage III NSCLC previously treated with curative intent chemoradiotherapy (concurrent or sequential) in the period between 2010 and 2013.

No interventions assigned to this group

Prospective cohort

Participating centers will provide prospective data on patients with stage III NSCLC treated with curative intent concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Centers will be asked to include at least 25 consecutive cases following the training intervention and the successful local implementation of PET/CT for RTP in NSCLC.

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* pathologically confirmed NSCLC
* stage III as per local diagnostic protocol or agreement of local multidisciplinary team
* available for clinical follow-up for at least 2 years
* suitable for treatment with a radical target volume in the opinion of a radiation oncologist
* ECOG performance 0 or 1
* signed informed consent
* ability to commence radiation therapy within 4 weeks of acquisition of the RTP PET/CT
* suitable for concurrent chemoradiotherapy (prospective cohort only)

Exclusion Criteria

* other neoplasms in the last 5 years except non-melanoma skin cancer
* stage IV disease diagnosed before acquisition of staging PET/CT
* inability to provide informed consent
* uncontrolled diabetes mellitus
* pregnant or breast feeding mothers
* tuberculosis
* neo-adjuvant chemotherapy
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

International Atomic Energy Agency

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

The Netherlands Cancer Institute

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Wouter V Vogel, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Antoni van Leeuwenhoek - Netherlands Cancer Institute

Gerard G Hanna, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen's University Belfast

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Tom Konert, BSc

Role: CONTACT

0031205127954

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

M14PRI

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

99mTc-3PRGD2 SPECT/CT in Lung Cancer Patients
NCT01737112 UNKNOWN EARLY_PHASE1
68Ga-ICAM-1pep PET/CT in Cancer Patients
NCT04596670 RECRUITING EARLY_PHASE1