An International Study on the Use of PET/CT in Radiotherapy Planning in Low and Middle Income Countries
NCT ID: NCT02247713
Last Updated: 2014-09-25
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
520 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2014-09-30
2017-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Assessment of 4D 18F-FDG PET-CT in Radiotherapy for Non Small Cell Lung Cancers
NCT01421953
PET-DECT for Staging and Imaged Based Radiotherapy Planning in Lung Cancer
NCT03146117
The Beneficial Value of PET/CT in the Follow-up of Stage III Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients
NCT06082492
PET CT Re-Planning NSCLC (4DCT-PET)
NCT03403127
The Utility of FDG-PET for Radiation Treatment in NSCLC
NCT00385164
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
In recent years, many health care institutions in low and middle income countries have established Nuclear Medicine (NM) imaging in routine clinical practice in conjunction with modern Radiation Oncology (RO) facilities. The installation of hybrid PET/CT systems in these countries permits more the increased use of PET/CT for both staging and radiotherapy planning. However the successful implementation of PET/CT for radiotherapy planning (RTP) requires a degree of expertise to safely and accurately implement this imaging technique. A recently published review by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), about current trends in NM in developing countries showed there is still lack of expertise, equipment and human resources to gain benefit from this imaging technique. In RO, difficulties in the implementation of this technique are mainly related to inadequate training of staff and lack of local expertise.
Quality assurance of the PET/CT scanners might be compromised when not performed according to accepted nuclear medicine quality assurance standards. Therefore, there is a concern that, if used without appropriate training or expertise, suboptimal image quality may result and inappropriate interpretation of the PET/CT for RTP may occur. In this study to help provide PET Quality Control will be executed to aim for a standardized PET image quality that meets the minimum requirements of European Association of Nuclear Medicine standards. Participating centers will be assisted to earn the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM) Research Ltd (EARL) accreditation. The quality of the imaging can be influenced by physiological and technical factors. The Standardized Uptake Value (SUV) allows for semi quantitative evaluation in PET imaging, and is influenced by these factors. Spatial resolution affects SUV values significantly and this parameter can differ a lot between multiple centers. The EANM NEMA NU 2001/2007 2 Image Quality Phantom allows for standardization of PET imaging between centers with different scanners, using the activity coefficient recovery curve (ACRC) as a parameter for quantification of this spatial resolution.
It is already known that FDG PET/CT based RTP enables appropriate selection of patients who will benefit from curative radiation therapy. One possible cause of failure in radiotherapy is the inability to accurately define the tumor edges. In these patients there are no other possible curative salvage treatment options and the disease is incurable. It is hoped that FDG PET/CT based RTP will improve tumor volume delineation (TVD) and hence improve outcomes following curative radiotherapy. There is also clear evidence that PET/CT standardizes TVD in patients with NSCLC. However, what is not known is the impact of PET/CT based TVD on patient outcomes such as survival as distinct from the benefit of PET/CT for patient selection for curative treatment. Furthermore, the impact of a training intervention on the use of PET/CT RTP in 2-year overall survival has not been studied to the best of our knowledge.
This study will evaluate the possible impact of the use of PET/CT for TVD on 2-year overall survival in patients with stage III NSCLC referred for curative intent radiotherapy with chemotherapy in low and middle income countries, this study involves a retrospective cohort study, a training intervention, and a prospective cohort study. The training intervention will focus on standard FDG PET/CT acquisition, FDG PET/CT image quality, staging procedure for FDG PET/CT acquisition and FDG PET/CT for RTP acquisition and Tumor Volume Delineation.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Retrospective cohort
Participating centers will retrospectively provide demographic, tumor, treatment and follow-up details on at least 25 consecutive patients with stage III NSCLC previously treated with curative intent chemoradiotherapy (concurrent or sequential) in the period between 2010 and 2013.
No interventions assigned to this group
Prospective cohort
Participating centers will provide prospective data on patients with stage III NSCLC treated with curative intent concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Centers will be asked to include at least 25 consecutive cases following the training intervention and the successful local implementation of PET/CT for RTP in NSCLC.
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* stage III as per local diagnostic protocol or agreement of local multidisciplinary team
* available for clinical follow-up for at least 2 years
* suitable for treatment with a radical target volume in the opinion of a radiation oncologist
* ECOG performance 0 or 1
* signed informed consent
* ability to commence radiation therapy within 4 weeks of acquisition of the RTP PET/CT
* suitable for concurrent chemoradiotherapy (prospective cohort only)
Exclusion Criteria
* stage IV disease diagnosed before acquisition of staging PET/CT
* inability to provide informed consent
* uncontrolled diabetes mellitus
* pregnant or breast feeding mothers
* tuberculosis
* neo-adjuvant chemotherapy
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
International Atomic Energy Agency
OTHER_GOV
The Netherlands Cancer Institute
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Wouter V Vogel, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Antoni van Leeuwenhoek - Netherlands Cancer Institute
Gerard G Hanna, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen's University Belfast
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
M14PRI
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.