The Beneficial Value of PET/CT in the Follow-up of Stage III Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients

NCT ID: NCT06082492

Last Updated: 2025-02-05

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

690 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-03-19

Study Completion Date

2029-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The primary objective of this study is to compare the 3-year overall survival of stage III NSCLC patients during follow-up surveillance with 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/ Computerized Tomography (18F FDG PET/CT) versus follow-up with conventional CT surveillance.

Participants will receive usual care until 3 years of follow-up (control group) with additional whole-body 18F FDG PET/CT scans during follow-up visits at 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months, and 36 months of follow-up in the intervention group.

Other tasks include:

* filling in quality of life (QOL) questionnaires at every time point;
* participating in an interview evaluating the addition of the 18F FDG PET/CT scans (optional);
* collecting blood at the follow-up time points for our secondary endpoint (optional).

Researchers will compare the usual care control group with the intervention group to see if the additional 18F FDG PET/CT scans are (cost-)effective.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients are at high risk of developing recurrences (50-78%) during follow-up. With more effective treatments available for patients with oligometastatic disease, early detection of tumor recurrence can prolong survival and health-related quality of life and thereby lower the disease burden. With the use of 18F FDG PET/CT during follow-up, recurrences may be detected earlier at an oligometastatic state when curative-intent treatment is still possible.

Primary objective:

\- The primary objective of this study is to compare the 3-year overall survival of stage III NSCLC patients during follow-up surveillance with 18F FDG PET/CT versus follow-up with conventional CT surveillance.

The secondary objectives of this study are:

* To compare the 2-year overall survival of stage III NSCLC patients during follow-up surveillance with 18F FDG PET/CT versus follow-up with conventional CT-based surveillance (interim analysis);
* To compare the number of detected (symptomatic and asymptomatic) recurrences of stage III NSCLC patients during follow-up surveillance with 18F FDG PET/CT versus follow-up with conventional CT-based surveillance;
* To compare the event-free survival of stage III NSCLC patients during follow-up surveillance with 18F FDG PET/CT versus follow-up with conventional CT-based surveillance;
* To determine the cost-effectiveness of 18F FDG PET/CT versus conventional CT-based surveillance during follow-up of stage III NSCLC patients;
* To compare the effect of 18F FDG PET/CT versus conventional CT-based surveillance on health-related quality of life during follow-up of stage III NSCLC patients;
* To assess the beneficial value of ctDNA in the detection of recurrences during follow-up in stage III NSCLC patients;
* To identify patients' experiences with the additional 18F FDG PET/CT scans in the follow-up of stage III NSCLC patients.
* To assess differences in type of treatment following recurrence during follow-up in stage III NSCLC patients.

Primary analyses will be performed on an intention-to-treat basis as well as per protocol. Kaplan-Meier curves with stratified log-rank 2-sided tests will be used to compare the survival between groups. In case of empty strata, strata will be collapsed. The clinical relevance of the difference will be primarily expressed in terms of 3-year survival of the intervention versus the control group.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Stage III Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

This is a multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial with a superiority design. At approximately 4 months after the end of curative intent treatment patients will be randomized 1:1 to either the intervention (18F FDG PET/CT) or the control group (usual care, CT-based follow-up). Randomization will be done stratifying for histology and treatment.

After the start of the study all patients will have regular follow-up visits at 6, 12, 18, 24 months and 36 months after the end of curative intent treatment, as is stated in the Dutch guidelines. In the intervention group these visits will be complemented by a 18F FDG PET/CT scan, while in the control group the visits will only contain a CT scan.

For patients in the intervention group who give consent for participation in the collection of blood, blood will be drawn around the scan.

At all time points patients will be asked to fill in the HRQOL and cost-effectiveness questionnaires.
Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Intervention group

The intervention group (n = 345) consists of usual care until 3 years of follow-up (see comparator) with additional whole-body 18F FDG PET/CT scans (from the skull to, at least, the midfemoral region) during follow-up visits at 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months, and 36 months of follow-up. After the 36-month follow-up period, patients will receive follow-up usual care (i.e. CT-scans).

The scanning protocol of Boellaard et al (2015) is the basis of all center-specific protocols and therefore will be followed approximately (PET low dose CT 60 minutes post injection with scan trajectory from skull to (at least the) thighs followed by a CT scan).

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

18F FDG PET/CT

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Additional 18F FDG PET/CT scans during follow-up visits at 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 months of follow-up.

CT scan

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

CT of the thoracic region during follow-up visits at 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 months of follow-up.

Control group (care as usual)

The control group (n = 345) consists of regular follow-up visits with physical check-ups and CT-scans at least every 6 months for the first 2 years and then at least yearly CT-scans until 3 years of follow-up. In case of suspected recurrence/metastasis or inconclusive results of a CT-scan (eg, after radiotherapy), 18F FDG PET/CT should be considered.

The standard protocol for a diagnostic CT of the thoracic region during IV contrast administration according to the lung tumor protocol will be followed

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

CT scan

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

CT of the thoracic region during follow-up visits at 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 months of follow-up.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

18F FDG PET/CT

Additional 18F FDG PET/CT scans during follow-up visits at 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 months of follow-up.

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

CT scan

CT of the thoracic region during follow-up visits at 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 months of follow-up.

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Whole body PET/CT scan

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

To be eligible to participate in this study, a subject must meet all of the following criteria at the timing of randomization:

* Cytological or histologically proven stage III non-small cell lung cancer before start of curative intent treatment
* Treated with curative intent and started follow-up care
* All adjuvant treatments are permitted as co-intervention during follow-up care
* Age 18 years or older
* ECOG Performance Status classification 0-2 at moment of inclusion
* Written and signed informed consent by the patient or patient's representative (with the understanding that consent may be withdrawn by the patient or patient's representative at any time without consequences to future medical care)

Exclusion Criteria

A potential subject who meets any of the following criteria will be excluded from participation in this study:

* Life expectancy shorter than 6 months at the end of curative intent treatment
* Evidence of recurrence after end of curative intent treatment and before randomization (4 months follow-up)
* Any condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, would interfere with evaluation of the intervention or interpretation of HRQOL or other study results.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Streekziekenhuis Koningin Beatrix

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Dijklander Ziekenhuis

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Deventer Ziekenhuis

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Elisabeth-TweeSteden Ziekenhuis

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Gelre Hospitals

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Groene Hart Ziekenhuis

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

HagaZiekenhuis

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Martini Hospital Groningen

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Medisch Spectrum Twente

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

St. Antonius Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Franciscus &Vlietland

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Tjongerschans

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Maasstadziekenhuis

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Gelderse Vallei Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Bravis Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Tergooi Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Treant Zorggroep

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Amphia Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

UMC Utrecht

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

OLVG

NETWORK

Sponsor Role collaborator

Haaglanden Medical Centre

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Radboud University Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Iris Walraven, PhD.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Radboud University Medical Center

Annemarie Becker-Commissaris, PhD./MD.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Amsterdam UMC

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Tergooi MC

Hilversum, Utrecht, Netherlands

Site Status RECRUITING

Amsterdam UMC

Amsterdam, , Netherlands

Site Status RECRUITING

Antoni van Leeuwenhoek/Nederlands Kanker Instituut

Amsterdam, , Netherlands

Site Status RECRUITING

OLVG

Amsterdam, , Netherlands

Site Status RECRUITING

Gelre Ziekenhuizen

Apeldoorn & Zutphen, , Netherlands

Site Status RECRUITING

Amphia Ziekenhuis

Breda, , Netherlands

Site Status RECRUITING

Deventer Ziekenhuis

Deventer, , Netherlands

Site Status RECRUITING

Ziekenhuis Gelderse Vallei

Ede, , Netherlands

Site Status RECRUITING

Máxima Medisch Centrum

Eindhoven & Veldhoven, , Netherlands

Site Status RECRUITING

Treant

Emmen, , Netherlands

Site Status RECRUITING

Medisch Spectrum Twente

Enschede, , Netherlands

Site Status RECRUITING

Groene Hart Ziekenhuis

Gouda, , Netherlands

Site Status RECRUITING

Martini Ziekenhuis

Groningen, , Netherlands

Site Status RECRUITING

Tjongerschans ziekenhuis

Heerenveen, , Netherlands

Site Status RECRUITING

Dijklander Ziekenhuis

Hoorn, , Netherlands

Site Status RECRUITING

Canisius Wilhelmina Ziekenhuis

Nijmegen, , Netherlands

Site Status RECRUITING

Radboudumc

Nijmegen, , Netherlands

Site Status RECRUITING

Bravis Ziekenhuis

Roosendaal, , Netherlands

Site Status RECRUITING

Maasstad ZIekenhuis

Rotterdam, , Netherlands

Site Status RECRUITING

Franciscus Gasthuis & Vlietland

Schiedam, , Netherlands

Site Status RECRUITING

Haaglanden Medisch Centrum

The Hague, , Netherlands

Site Status RECRUITING

HagaZiekenhuis

The Hague, , Netherlands

Site Status RECRUITING

Elisabeth-TweeSteden Ziekenhuis

Tilburg, , Netherlands

Site Status RECRUITING

Diakonessenhuis

Utrecht, , Netherlands

Site Status RECRUITING

UMC Utrecht

Utrecht, , Netherlands

Site Status RECRUITING

St. Antonius Ziekenhuis

Utrecht & Nieuwegein, , Netherlands

Site Status RECRUITING

Streekziekenhuis Koningin Beatrix

Winterswijk, , Netherlands

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Netherlands

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

NVALT31-PET study team

Role: CONTACT

+31611469084

Nicole E. Billingy, MSc.

Role: CONTACT

+31611469084

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

L. Kwast

Role: primary

M. Smink

Role: primary

E. Schouten

Role: primary

Research Longgeneeskunde

Role: primary

M. van Nistelrooij

Role: primary

Research Longoncologie

Role: primary

Research Oncologie

Role: primary

A. Mulders

Role: primary

M. Bax

Role: primary

T. Bokhorst

Role: primary

Onderzoeksbureau Longgeneeskunde

Role: primary

K. van Elst

Role: primary

I. Jonker

Role: primary

H. Langenberg-Post

Role: primary

Y. van Dekken

Role: primary

Research Long

Role: primary

Nicole E. Billingy, MSc.

Role: primary

+31611469084

NVALT31-PET Study Team

Role: backup

+31611469084

J. Schellekens

Role: primary

Research Oncologie

Role: primary

S. Broerse

Role: primary

E. Gortmaker

Role: primary

Research Longziekten

Role: primary

A. Velthoven

Role: primary

Research Oncologie

Role: primary

S. Jans

Role: primary

R&D Longoncologie

Role: primary

E. Klein Zeggelink

Role: primary

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Billingy NE, Verberkt CA, Bahce I, Hassing MJ, Schoorlemmer J, Sarioglu M, Senan S, Aarntzen EHJG, Comans EFI, Kievit W, Teerenstra S, Jacobs C, Keijser A, Heuvel MMVD, Becker-Commissaris A, Walraven I; The NVALT31-PET Consortium. Beneficial value of [18F]FDG PET/CT in the follow-up of patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NVALT31-PET study): study protocol of a multicentre randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2025 Jul 25;15(7):e103745. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-103745.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 40713037 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

NL83288.091.23

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

114319

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

PET CT Re-Planning NSCLC (4DCT-PET)
NCT03403127 COMPLETED NA
Added Value of PET/CT in Lung Cancer
NCT06494800 NOT_YET_RECRUITING