The Beneficial Value of PET/CT in the Follow-up of Stage III Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients
NCT ID: NCT06082492
Last Updated: 2025-02-05
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
690 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-03-19
2029-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Participants will receive usual care until 3 years of follow-up (control group) with additional whole-body 18F FDG PET/CT scans during follow-up visits at 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months, and 36 months of follow-up in the intervention group.
Other tasks include:
* filling in quality of life (QOL) questionnaires at every time point;
* participating in an interview evaluating the addition of the 18F FDG PET/CT scans (optional);
* collecting blood at the follow-up time points for our secondary endpoint (optional).
Researchers will compare the usual care control group with the intervention group to see if the additional 18F FDG PET/CT scans are (cost-)effective.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Positron Emission Tomography for Detecting Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
NCT00004138
Study of Positron Emission Tomography and Computed Tomography in Guiding Radiation Therapy in Patients With Stage III Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
NCT01507428
Evaluation of FLT-PET and DWI-MRI in Patients With NSCLC Treated With a Platinum-based Doublet as Preoperative Chemo
NCT02273271
F-18 FDG PET/CT and CT in Initial Staging of Non-small Lung Cancer
NCT06789562
FDG-PET/CT Scans in Patients With Stage IIIB or Stage IV NSCLC Undergoing Chemotherapy
NCT00424138
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Primary objective:
\- The primary objective of this study is to compare the 3-year overall survival of stage III NSCLC patients during follow-up surveillance with 18F FDG PET/CT versus follow-up with conventional CT surveillance.
The secondary objectives of this study are:
* To compare the 2-year overall survival of stage III NSCLC patients during follow-up surveillance with 18F FDG PET/CT versus follow-up with conventional CT-based surveillance (interim analysis);
* To compare the number of detected (symptomatic and asymptomatic) recurrences of stage III NSCLC patients during follow-up surveillance with 18F FDG PET/CT versus follow-up with conventional CT-based surveillance;
* To compare the event-free survival of stage III NSCLC patients during follow-up surveillance with 18F FDG PET/CT versus follow-up with conventional CT-based surveillance;
* To determine the cost-effectiveness of 18F FDG PET/CT versus conventional CT-based surveillance during follow-up of stage III NSCLC patients;
* To compare the effect of 18F FDG PET/CT versus conventional CT-based surveillance on health-related quality of life during follow-up of stage III NSCLC patients;
* To assess the beneficial value of ctDNA in the detection of recurrences during follow-up in stage III NSCLC patients;
* To identify patients' experiences with the additional 18F FDG PET/CT scans in the follow-up of stage III NSCLC patients.
* To assess differences in type of treatment following recurrence during follow-up in stage III NSCLC patients.
Primary analyses will be performed on an intention-to-treat basis as well as per protocol. Kaplan-Meier curves with stratified log-rank 2-sided tests will be used to compare the survival between groups. In case of empty strata, strata will be collapsed. The clinical relevance of the difference will be primarily expressed in terms of 3-year survival of the intervention versus the control group.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
After the start of the study all patients will have regular follow-up visits at 6, 12, 18, 24 months and 36 months after the end of curative intent treatment, as is stated in the Dutch guidelines. In the intervention group these visits will be complemented by a 18F FDG PET/CT scan, while in the control group the visits will only contain a CT scan.
For patients in the intervention group who give consent for participation in the collection of blood, blood will be drawn around the scan.
At all time points patients will be asked to fill in the HRQOL and cost-effectiveness questionnaires.
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Intervention group
The intervention group (n = 345) consists of usual care until 3 years of follow-up (see comparator) with additional whole-body 18F FDG PET/CT scans (from the skull to, at least, the midfemoral region) during follow-up visits at 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months, and 36 months of follow-up. After the 36-month follow-up period, patients will receive follow-up usual care (i.e. CT-scans).
The scanning protocol of Boellaard et al (2015) is the basis of all center-specific protocols and therefore will be followed approximately (PET low dose CT 60 minutes post injection with scan trajectory from skull to (at least the) thighs followed by a CT scan).
18F FDG PET/CT
Additional 18F FDG PET/CT scans during follow-up visits at 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 months of follow-up.
CT scan
CT of the thoracic region during follow-up visits at 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 months of follow-up.
Control group (care as usual)
The control group (n = 345) consists of regular follow-up visits with physical check-ups and CT-scans at least every 6 months for the first 2 years and then at least yearly CT-scans until 3 years of follow-up. In case of suspected recurrence/metastasis or inconclusive results of a CT-scan (eg, after radiotherapy), 18F FDG PET/CT should be considered.
The standard protocol for a diagnostic CT of the thoracic region during IV contrast administration according to the lung tumor protocol will be followed
CT scan
CT of the thoracic region during follow-up visits at 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 months of follow-up.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
18F FDG PET/CT
Additional 18F FDG PET/CT scans during follow-up visits at 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 months of follow-up.
CT scan
CT of the thoracic region during follow-up visits at 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 months of follow-up.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Cytological or histologically proven stage III non-small cell lung cancer before start of curative intent treatment
* Treated with curative intent and started follow-up care
* All adjuvant treatments are permitted as co-intervention during follow-up care
* Age 18 years or older
* ECOG Performance Status classification 0-2 at moment of inclusion
* Written and signed informed consent by the patient or patient's representative (with the understanding that consent may be withdrawn by the patient or patient's representative at any time without consequences to future medical care)
Exclusion Criteria
* Life expectancy shorter than 6 months at the end of curative intent treatment
* Evidence of recurrence after end of curative intent treatment and before randomization (4 months follow-up)
* Any condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, would interfere with evaluation of the intervention or interpretation of HRQOL or other study results.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc
OTHER
Streekziekenhuis Koningin Beatrix
UNKNOWN
Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital
OTHER
Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht
OTHER
Dijklander Ziekenhuis
OTHER
Deventer Ziekenhuis
OTHER
Elisabeth-TweeSteden Ziekenhuis
OTHER
Gelre Hospitals
OTHER
Groene Hart Ziekenhuis
OTHER
HagaZiekenhuis
OTHER
Martini Hospital Groningen
OTHER
Medisch Spectrum Twente
OTHER
St. Antonius Hospital
OTHER
Franciscus &Vlietland
OTHER
Tjongerschans
UNKNOWN
Maasstadziekenhuis
UNKNOWN
Gelderse Vallei Hospital
OTHER
Bravis Hospital
OTHER
Tergooi Hospital
OTHER
Treant Zorggroep
UNKNOWN
Amphia Hospital
OTHER
UMC Utrecht
OTHER
OLVG
NETWORK
Haaglanden Medical Centre
OTHER
Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital
OTHER
Radboud University Medical Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Iris Walraven, PhD.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Radboud University Medical Center
Annemarie Becker-Commissaris, PhD./MD.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Amsterdam UMC
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Tergooi MC
Hilversum, Utrecht, Netherlands
Amsterdam UMC
Amsterdam, , Netherlands
Antoni van Leeuwenhoek/Nederlands Kanker Instituut
Amsterdam, , Netherlands
OLVG
Amsterdam, , Netherlands
Gelre Ziekenhuizen
Apeldoorn & Zutphen, , Netherlands
Amphia Ziekenhuis
Breda, , Netherlands
Deventer Ziekenhuis
Deventer, , Netherlands
Ziekenhuis Gelderse Vallei
Ede, , Netherlands
Máxima Medisch Centrum
Eindhoven & Veldhoven, , Netherlands
Treant
Emmen, , Netherlands
Medisch Spectrum Twente
Enschede, , Netherlands
Groene Hart Ziekenhuis
Gouda, , Netherlands
Martini Ziekenhuis
Groningen, , Netherlands
Tjongerschans ziekenhuis
Heerenveen, , Netherlands
Dijklander Ziekenhuis
Hoorn, , Netherlands
Canisius Wilhelmina Ziekenhuis
Nijmegen, , Netherlands
Radboudumc
Nijmegen, , Netherlands
Bravis Ziekenhuis
Roosendaal, , Netherlands
Maasstad ZIekenhuis
Rotterdam, , Netherlands
Franciscus Gasthuis & Vlietland
Schiedam, , Netherlands
Haaglanden Medisch Centrum
The Hague, , Netherlands
HagaZiekenhuis
The Hague, , Netherlands
Elisabeth-TweeSteden Ziekenhuis
Tilburg, , Netherlands
Diakonessenhuis
Utrecht, , Netherlands
UMC Utrecht
Utrecht, , Netherlands
St. Antonius Ziekenhuis
Utrecht & Nieuwegein, , Netherlands
Streekziekenhuis Koningin Beatrix
Winterswijk, , Netherlands
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
L. Kwast
Role: primary
M. Smink
Role: primary
E. Schouten
Role: primary
M. van Nistelrooij
Role: primary
Research Longoncologie
Role: primary
Research Oncologie
Role: primary
M. Bax
Role: primary
T. Bokhorst
Role: primary
K. van Elst
Role: primary
I. Jonker
Role: primary
H. Langenberg-Post
Role: primary
Y. van Dekken
Role: primary
Research Long
Role: primary
J. Schellekens
Role: primary
Research Oncologie
Role: primary
S. Broerse
Role: primary
E. Gortmaker
Role: primary
Research Longziekten
Role: primary
A. Velthoven
Role: primary
Research Oncologie
Role: primary
R&D Longoncologie
Role: primary
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Billingy NE, Verberkt CA, Bahce I, Hassing MJ, Schoorlemmer J, Sarioglu M, Senan S, Aarntzen EHJG, Comans EFI, Kievit W, Teerenstra S, Jacobs C, Keijser A, Heuvel MMVD, Becker-Commissaris A, Walraven I; The NVALT31-PET Consortium. Beneficial value of [18F]FDG PET/CT in the follow-up of patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NVALT31-PET study): study protocol of a multicentre randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2025 Jul 25;15(7):e103745. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-103745.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
NL83288.091.23
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
114319
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.