Comparison of HFNO and FMV on Desaturations During Panendoscopy Under General Anesthesia
NCT ID: NCT05593718
Last Updated: 2024-02-07
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
450 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2024-10-20
2024-11-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
However, the use of HFNO seems to show a prolongation of apnea time without desaturations (\< 90% SpO2) and seems to allow the performance of panendocoscopies.
In the Besançon University Hospital, since 2017, all panendoscopies are performed with HFNO. Before 2017, panendoscopies were performed under face mask ventilation. The main of the study hypothesis is that HFNO brought a gain in terms of safety, especially on the desaturation rate compared to face mask ventilation.
The investigators will carry out a quasi-experimental study comparing two periods. The first period concerns the years 2015-2016. It aims to study patients who had panendoscopies performed under FMV. The second period covers the years 2018-2019. It aims to study patients who had panendoscopies performed under HFNO.
The year 2017 is considered as the washout period necessary to avoid the learning effect of the HFNO introduced during that year.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Opioid Free Anesthesia Versus Opioid Based Anesthesia
NCT06650371
Comparison of Analgesic Efficacy and Occurrence of Emesis Among Different Background Infusion and Bolus Administration Regimens of Fentanyl Based Intravenous Patient-controlled Analgesia in Patients After Laparoscopic Assisted Gastrectomy - a Randomized Blind Study -
NCT01863355
Anesthetics in Rhytidoplasty - A Comparison Study
NCT02410460
A Comparison of Injection Pain of Propofol During Endoscopy : LCT Propofol vs MCT/LCT Propofol
NCT02567916
Prevention of Post-Operative Nausea and Vomiting With Propofol Infusion
NCT05759481
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
* Mechanical ventilation with oro-tracheal intubation (OTI)
* face mask ventilation (FMV)
* Jet ventilation
* HFNO Each of these methods has advantages and disadvantages, which explains why there are no clear recommendations to date on the preferred anesthesia and oxygenation technique. Regardless of the method chosen, the risks remain significant for the patient, particularly the risk of hypoxemia during a desaturation episode.
In 2017, HFNO was introduced for panendoscopies in the Besançon University Hospital. Before 2017, panendoscopies were mainly perfomed with intermittent face mask ventilation.
The objective of the study is to compare the FMV group (patients receiving panendoscopy and ventilated with FMV during 2015-2016) with the HFNO group (patients receiving panendoscopy and oxygenated with HFNO during 2018-2019) with respect to perprocedural hypoxemia (SpO2\<90% for more than 1 minute).
Secondary objectives are to compare complications, use of oro-tracheal intubation, and procedure duration between the two oxygenation methods.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
OTHER
RETROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
FaceMask Ventilation (FMV)
During the period from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2016, all panendoscopies performed with FMV, whether urgent or scheduled and regardless of indication, were included. Panendoscopies performed with any other oxygenation method were excluded.
No interventions assigned to this group
HFNO
During the period from January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2019, all panendoscopies performed with HFNO, urgent or scheduled and regardless of indication, were included. Panendoscopies performed with any other oxygenation method were excluded.
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* patients ventilated by face mask during the first period,
* patients receiving oxygen by HFNO during the second period
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients receiving panendoscopies performed with a method of oxygenation other than those defined in their period.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besancon
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
David Ferreira
Principal Investigator
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besançon
Besançon, Franche Comté, France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
ID052021HFNO
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.