Regional Analgesia in Combination With Cryoanalgesia to Prevent Acute Pain Following Nuss Procedure
NCT ID: NCT05589246
Last Updated: 2022-10-21
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
40 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-09-28
2022-12-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Cryoanalgesia to Prevent Acute and Chronic Pain Following Nuss Procedure
NCT05570097
Cryoanalgesia Aplication Time Optimization During Nuss Procedure
NCT05831137
Cryoanalgesia vs. Epidural in the Nuss Procedure
NCT02721017
Phrenic Infiltration as Cryoanalgesia Adjuvant for Early Postoperative Pain Following the Nuss Procedure
NCT07290582
Intercostal Nerve Cryoablation Versus Epidural Analgesia for Nuss Repair of Pectus Excavatum
NCT05731973
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
This Before - After Study is a single institution pilot study designed to compare intraoperative cryolesia alone (control group) with the intervention group (cryolesia and bilateral erector spine plane block). It is designed for better management of acute pain in the pediatric population diagnosed with funnel-chest and treated using the modyfied Nuss method. Control group received standard care with cryolesia using the Cryo-S Painless device (Metrum - Cryoflex Polska Limited) and multimodal analgesia according the current guidelines. The intervention group received all of the above and regional analgesia (erector spine plain block, ESP block).
The aims of the study were the assessment the effectiveness of ESP block before full action of intraoperative cryoanalgesia as a method of acute pain control, safety of the method.
The results were compared in terms of demographics, pain levels, side effects of the pain relief medications in the postoperative period and lenght of hospitalization.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
SEQUENTIAL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
control
intraoperative cryoanalgesia of intercostal nerves with multimodal analgesia
No interventions assigned to this group
intervention
regional analgesia (ESP block) with intraoperative cryoanalgesia of intercostal nerves and multimodal analgesia
regional analgesia with cryolesia
The regional analgesia (erector spine plane block) will be added to intraoperative cryolesia of intercostal nerves
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
regional analgesia with cryolesia
The regional analgesia (erector spine plane block) will be added to intraoperative cryolesia of intercostal nerves
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* aged 10 years or above 10 up to 18
* informed consent signed for cryoanalgesia informed consent signed for regional analgesia
Exclusion Criteria
* Refuse to receive cryoanalgesia or regional analgesia as primary pain relief
* Any contraindication to cryoanalgesia
* Difficult follow-up for geographical reasons and/or impossibility by the patient to understand how to perform self-measurements
10 Years
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Pomeranian Medical University Szczecin
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Jowita Biernawska
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jowita Biernawska, MD PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Pomeranian Medical Universitet Szczecin
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Pomeranian Medical University
Szczecin, , Poland
Pomeranian Medical University
Szczecin, , Poland
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
PomeranianMU-KRIO
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.