An Observational Study of Emergence and Hypoactive Delirium After Anesthesia
NCT ID: NCT05582005
Last Updated: 2022-10-17
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
150 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2022-12-31
2023-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Incidence and Characteristics of Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction in Elderly Quebec Francophone Patients
NCT03337282
Electroencephalogram Predicts Post-operative Delirium
NCT06894238
Anesthesia-analgesia Methods and Postoperative Delirium
NCT01661907
Cerebral Oxygen Desaturation and Post-Operative Delirium in Thoracic Surgical Patients
NCT03165539
Postoperative Delirium in Elderly Patients Undergoing Major Non-Cardiac Surgery in Singapore
NCT04330950
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Unsettle behavior after anesthesia is associated with patient injury, damage to incision sites, exacerbated parental anxiety, increased nursing workload and cost of the healthcare system. Moreover, agitated children are seven times more likely to have new-onset separation anxiety, apathy, eating and sleeping problems.
The term early postoperative negative behavior (e-PONB) includes different unsettle behaviors after awakening and differentiates early phase from later postoperative behavioral changes. The more relevant components of e-PONB have been identified as pain and Emergence Delirium (ED).
ED a mental disturbance during the recovery from general anesthesia consisting in hallucinations, delusions and confusion manifested by moaning, restlessness, involuntary physical activity, and thrashing in bed. ED occurs within the first 20 min of recovery from anesthesia and often lasts 5-15 minutes and is self-limited.
The five-item Pediatric Anesthesia Emergence Delirium (PAED) scale is the gold standard to assess ED in the pediatric population. However, the diagnosis of ED may be affected by the concurrent presence postsurgical pain. A recent investigation found that only three of the five items of the PAED are delirium-specific ('Eye contact, 'Awareness of the surroundings', 'Purposeful actions'), whereas the other two ('Restlessness' and 'Inconsolability') are noted. As a consequence, if the child has 'no eye contact' and is 'no aware of surroundings,' emergence delirium should be suspected. On the contrary, a child showing 'Abnormal facial expression,' 'Crying' and being 'Inconsolable,' likely suffers of pain. The ED I and II score have been defined as the sum of the first 3-item (eye contact, purposeful movement, and awareness of surrounding) and the last 2-item scores (restlessness and inconsolability) of the PAED scale, respectively.
In up to 15% of children, however, the discrimination between ED and Pain remains impossible. In nonverbal children, in fact, pain is routinely assessed with the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC) scale. The PAED scale and the FLACC scale overlap on three items ('Inconsolability', 'Purposeful actions' and 'Restlessness'), which may lead to misdiagnose pain or ED.
Moreover, one in four children suffering from ED can present with a hypoactive delirium. Children are quiet, confused and disoriented: they do not make eye contact with the caregiver and may not be aware of their surroundings. Rather than being restless, agitated, and making non-purposeful movements, these children would only make minimal movements when awake, are non-communicative, and do not respond to social interactions. Primarily described in intensive care, hypoactive delirium is less recognized during the emergence from general anesthesia. In children, the Cornell Assessment of Pediatric Delirium (CAP-D) revise scale has been proposed to diagnose hypoactive delirium, but data are limited to one study on postsurgical patients.
In order to properly investigate ED and hypoactive delirium without the interference of concomitant pain, studies should be performed in a context of general anesthesia without any painful interventions. Children receiving general anesthesia for Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) represent the ideal population free of "nociceptive stimulation" to investigate the incidence of ED and hypoactive delirium. However, up to one third of preschool children recovering from general anesthesia after MRI studies may show a FLACC score compatible with pain. Children experiencing ED were three times more likely to be also scored with pain.
In conclusion, children awaking from anesthesia might present different forms of negative behavior after anesthesia, namely ED, hypoactive delirium or pain. The evolution, treatment, prognosis and clinical implications of these conditions are different. There is a real practical need for a bedside tool to differentiate pain, ED and hypoactive delirium.
More recently, heart rate variability (HRV) has been proposed as a surrogate measure of pain and distress. In fact, HRV is affected by the balance between sympathetic and parasympathetic tone, and the high frequency changes of HRV is primarily mediated by and specific to the parasympathetic nervous system. The phenomena of pain, fear, anxiety and intraoperative nociception have proven to be accompanied by changes in HRV1.
The newborn infant parasympathetic evaluation (NIPE) is a non-invasive, standardized continuous measurement of HRV. The cardiac signal is extrapolated from the electrocardiogram and respiratory rate (RR) series are computed between two heart beats, resampled at 8 Hz, mean centered and normalized over a 64-second moving window. A wavelet based high pass filter over 0.15 Hz is applied in order to keep parasympathetic related variations only, which are mainly influenced by the respiratory cycle. The NIPE monitor displays two averaged measurements: the average NIPE (NIPEa) results from the average of NIPE measured over the previous 20 minutes, and current NIPE (NIPEc) results from the average of NIPE measured over the previous 64 seconds. A non-disclosed algorithm derived from the high frequency changes of the HRV calculates a score between 0 and 100, where a score of 0 indicates minimal parasympathetic tone and maximal nociception and a score of 100 indicates maximal parasympathetic tone and minimal nociception. To date, NIPE has shown promising results in the assessment of pain and neonatal comfort. In a recent study performed in postsurgical children at the Montreal Children's Hospital, the NIPE showed a significant correlation with pain but not with ED. Although the explanation remains speculative, it is possible that a some of the criteria of PAED are noyt associated with a variation of the parasympathetic tone (and therefore NIPE).
Should these results be confirmed, NIPE might be helpful to rule out the presence of pain and exclude ED.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_CONTROL
PROSPECTIVE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
noninvasive blood pressure, 3 lead ECG, peripheral oxygen saturation
Children 3 year old and younger, scheduled for elective MRI, that are not intubated or require higher oxygen support and with no parents/guardians refusal will be placed on an electrocardiogram during post-anesthesia recovery. The NIPE monitor will be connected to the patients monitor in the PACU. Values will be recorded from the time of patient awaking until the patient meets the discharge criteria from PACU not before 1 hour.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients whose parents are fluent in French or English.
Exclusion Criteria
* Parent/guardian refusal
As this study will be conducted with only one NIPE monitor, and it will be devoted to the patient for about 1 hours, two consecutive patients cannot be enrolled in the study. In this case, the second patient will be considered eligible but excluded, and data will not be collected.
1 Year
3 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Gianluca Bertolizio
MD, FRCPC, Associate Professor, Anesthesiologist
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Montreal Children's Hospital
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2023-9181
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.