Comparison of Analgesic and Sedative Effects of Esmketamine and Remifentanil Combined With Propofol Respectively in Septic Shock Patients With Invasive Mechanical Ventilation

NCT ID: NCT05551910

Last Updated: 2022-09-23

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

120 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-01-01

Study Completion Date

2025-03-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Septic shock patients with invasive mechanical ventilation who were randomly enrolled in ICU were divided into esketamine group (test group) and remifentanil group (control group) according to the ratio of 1:1. The dose of vasopressor, the time of mechanical ventilation, the incidence of intestinal dysfunction and the dose of propofol were compared between the two groups. Through statistical analysis, it was determined whether esketamine combined with propofol could improve the prognosis of septic shock patients with invasive mechanical ventilation and reduce the adverse reactions of analgesic and sedative drugs compared with remifentanil combined with propofol.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The purpose of this study is to determine whether esketamine combined with propofol can improve the prognosis and reduce the adverse effects of analgesic and sedative drugs in septic shock patients undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation compared with remifentanil combined with propofol.

Study methods: septic shock patients with invasive mechanical ventilation in ICU were randomly divided into esketamine group (test group) and remifentanil group (control group) according to the ratio of 1:1. 120 patients are expected to be enrolled. The dose of vasopressor, the time of mechanical ventilation, the incidence of intestinal dysfunction and the dose of propofol were compared between the two groups. Through statistical analysis, it was determined whether esketamine combined with propofol could improve the prognosis of septic shock patients with invasive mechanical ventilation and reduce the adverse reactions of analgesic and sedative drugs compared with remifentanil combined with propofol.

From January 1, 2023 to January 1, 2024, the clinical study of the patients (60 cases) enrolled in the first phase was completed as expected in the study protocol. Stage objective: to count the relevant detection indicators of the two groups of patients, analyze and compare whether there is a difference between the primary endpoint and the secondary observation endpoint, and write a research paper and a mid-term summary.

From January 1, 2024 to January 1, 2025, the clinical study of patients (60 cases) enrolled in the second phase was completed according to the research protocol. Stage objective: to count the relevant detection indicators of the two groups of patients, analyze and compare whether there is a difference between the primary endpoint and the secondary observation endpoint, and write a research paper and a conclusion report.

Publication form of research results: 1-2 academic papers published in domestic or international journals.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Patients With Septic Shock Admitted to the ICU on Invasive Mechanical Ventilation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

RCT
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Analgesia and sedation with esmketamine combined with propofol

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Esketamine

Intervention Type DRUG

The patients in the test group were given esmketamine (50mg / 2ml \* branch, Jiangsu Hengrui Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.) 0.15-0.5mg/kg H was pumped intravenously. Two minutes after the administration, the pain was scored with the cpot pain observation scale. The target cpot was \< 3 points. The dose of esketamine was adjusted according to the cpot score.

propofol

Intervention Type DRUG

propofol

Remifentanil combined with propofol for analgesia and sedation

Group Type OTHER

Remifentanil

Intervention Type DRUG

Patients in the control group were given remifentanil (1mg / branch, Yichang humanwell Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.) 0.05-2ug/kg Minutes after administration, the analgesic score was measured with cpot pain observation scale. The target cpot was less than 3 points, and the dose of remifentanil was adjusted according to the cpot score.

propofol

Intervention Type DRUG

propofol

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Esketamine

The patients in the test group were given esmketamine (50mg / 2ml \* branch, Jiangsu Hengrui Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.) 0.15-0.5mg/kg H was pumped intravenously. Two minutes after the administration, the pain was scored with the cpot pain observation scale. The target cpot was \< 3 points. The dose of esketamine was adjusted according to the cpot score.

Intervention Type DRUG

Remifentanil

Patients in the control group were given remifentanil (1mg / branch, Yichang humanwell Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.) 0.05-2ug/kg Minutes after administration, the analgesic score was measured with cpot pain observation scale. The target cpot was less than 3 points, and the dose of remifentanil was adjusted according to the cpot score.

Intervention Type DRUG

propofol

propofol

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Adults (aged 18-75 years)
2. Septic shock patients with invasive mechanical ventilation
3. Use norepinephrine (the only vasoactive drug) to maintain the target map ≥ 65 mmHg
4. BMI 18.5-23.9kg/m2

Exclusion Criteria

1. Pregnant or lactating women;
2. Patients allergic to planned drugs;
3. Hypertension patients with poor control;
4. Patients with mental illness, chronic pain, seizures, elevated intracranial pressure, severe ischemic heart disease, and bronchial asthma;
5. Patients included in other trial items;
6. Other reasons that the researcher considers unsuitable to participate in this study.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

The First Hospital of Jilin University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Yuting Li

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Li Y, Li H, Zhang F, Chen Y, Zhang D. Effects of Esketamine Versus Remifentanil on Hemodynamics and Prognosis in Patients with Septic Shock Receiving Invasive Mechanical Ventilation: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2025 May 21;19:4139-4149. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S520252. eCollection 2025.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 40416798 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Yuting Li

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Ketamine Versus Propofol as ICU Sedation
NCT06243822 COMPLETED PHASE4